Solutions2Share Teams Manager vs. Torii

Solutions2Share Teams Manager

Torii

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
Teams Manager	Score 8.0 out of 10	N/A	IT administrators can keep control of their Microsoft 365 environment with Teams Manager. Teams Manager is used to prevent the uncontrolled creation of Teams and Groups and automate governance processes. Key Features: • Governance Dashboard and Reports – provides an overview of the M365 environment (inactive or ownerless teams, teams with guests etc.) • Provisioning of new teams & SharePoint sites – with channels,…	$1.50 per year per user
Torii	Score 10.0 out of 10	N/A	Torii, from the company of the same name in New York, lets IT professionals discover, optimize, and control their organization’s SaaS usage and costs. With it, users can gain full visibility into all SaaS applications used in an organization. Know which SaaS are actually in use and who’s using them.	N/A

Pricing

Solutions2Share Teams Manager

Torii

Editions & Modules

XL: more than 4,000 users: € 1.50
per year per user
Small: 1 - 249 users: € 1500
per year
Medium: 250 - 999 users: € 3780
per year
Large: 1,000 - 4,000 users: € 6050
per year

No answers on this topic

Offerings

Pricing Offerings
Teams Manager	Torii
Free Trial
Yes	No
Free/Freemium Version
No	No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No	No

Entry-level Setup Fee

$2,100 one-time fee

No setup fee

Additional Details

Information on Enterprise editions and Support packages can be found at the vendor's website.

—

More Pricing Information

Community Pulse
	Solutions2Share Teams Manager	Torii
Considered Both Products	Teams Manager Verified User Anonymous Chose Teams Manager Similar teams meeting management software with totally different functionality. It was used briefly in a one-off trial but was never implemented due to the dominance of Teams and Zoom. It's essential to use software that most people can access, or at least quickly obtain, for … Incentivized Helpful? AJ Ahmad jan Customer service rep Chose Teams Manager As skype for business was getting outdated so we prefer Microsoft Teams over Skype. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Teams Manager Our general contractor for the build-out selected MT over Zoom. It was not our choice. Zoom has a bit more movement with background screen images and vid quality but it's all fairly close. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Teams Manager We still use it for our one-off situations, but mostly stick to Teams as it is much more user-friendly and allows better sharing capabilities through virtual meetings. Skype is not as easily customized, so it's a no-brainer to use Microsoft Teams and Team Manager for all of our … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Teams Manager As I mentioned before, we switched to Teams from Skype because it was more reliable. We did not experience interruptions in service especially for those departments working remote. Incentivized Helpful?	Torii No answer on this topic

Best Alternatives
	Solutions2Share Teams Manager	Torii
Small Businesses	No answers on this topic	Teams Manager Score 8.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies	No answers on this topic	Teams Manager Score 8.0 out of 10
Enterprises	SailPoint Identity Security Cloud Score 9.0 out of 10	SailPoint Identity Security Cloud Score 9.0 out of 10
All Alternatives	View all alternatives	View all alternatives

User Ratings
	Solutions2Share Teams Manager	Torii
Likelihood to Recommend	8.0 (0 ratings)	- (0 ratings)
Usability	8.0 (0 ratings)	- (0 ratings)

User Testimonials
	Solutions2Share Teams Manager	Torii
Likelihood to Recommend	For different projects in a big organization different teams can be formed and thus their internal tasks assignments can be done there. It is easy to manage, assign tasks to people in a particular project. People or team leads in multiple projects can share different channels thus maintaining different projects. Users should be refrained of creating new teams just for fun purpose etc. to avoid to much chaos. Incentivized Rehan Ansari IT Manager Read full review	No answers on this topic
Pros	Manage channels - the level of detail of managing what channels are created and how they function is great. Manage users - it's easy to manage owners of team sites, along with members and guests. Analytics - being able to review how each team site and the channel is being used is extremely helpful and can point out areas of weakness or concern. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	No answers on this topic
Cons	The video conferencing feature could afford to me a little more user friendly. Branding of Microsoft Teams over Skype Needs done. Making calls through Teams has not been very successful. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	No answers on this topic
Usability	It is a well-designed and polished application on Teams. Most of its issues stem from Teams UI and UX, which could be improved further. However, if you can fit the team manager to your needs, it can become a very powerful tool to manage data flow. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered	Similar teams meeting management software with totally different functionality. It was used briefly in a one-off trial but was never implemented due to the dominance of Teams and Zoom. It's essential to use software that most people can access, or at least quickly obtain, for holding meetings with people outside of your organization. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	No answers on this topic
Return on Investment	Being able to manage schedules through a platform we're already using has had a positive impact on ROI Overall team success and happiness through Teams has been made possible by the management of the team site by the Team Manager (positive impact on ROI) Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	No answers on this topic
ScreenShots	Teams Manager Screenshots