Solutions2Share Teams Manager vs. TRELICA

For different projects in a big organization different teams can be formed and thus their internal tasks assignments can be done there. It is easy to manage, assign tasks to people in a particular project. People or team leads in multiple projects can share different channels thus maintaining different projects. Users should be refrained of creating new teams just for fun purpose etc. to avoid to much chaos.

Incentivized

• Manage channels - the level of detail of managing what channels are created and how they function is great.
• Manage users - it's easy to manage owners of team sites, along with members and guests.
• Analytics - being able to review how each team site and the channel is being used is extremely helpful and can point out areas of weakness or concern.

Incentivized

• The video conferencing feature could afford to me a little more user friendly.
• Branding of Microsoft Teams over Skype Needs done.
• Making calls through Teams has not been very successful.

Incentivized

It is a well-designed and polished application on Teams. Most of its issues stem from Teams UI and UX, which could be improved further. However, if you can fit the team manager to your needs, it can become a very powerful tool to manage data flow.

Incentivized

Similar teams meeting management software with totally different functionality. It was used briefly in a one-off trial but was never implemented due to the dominance of Teams and Zoom. It's essential to use software that most people can access, or at least quickly obtain, for holding meetings with people outside of your organization.

Incentivized

• Being able to manage schedules through a platform we're already using has had a positive impact on ROI
• Overall team success and happiness through Teams has been made possible by the management of the team site by the Team Manager (positive impact on ROI)

Incentivized