Timesheets by Tempo vs. Timeneye

tracking time on actual tickets being worked is a great fit. trying to track soft functions that normally have nothing to do with Jira is much more cumbersome and difficult to manage.

Incentivized

Timeneye is appropriate when you need a basic time tracking software without a lot of gimmicks or external capabilities. It connects into your existing efforts and has a simple layout. Though it doesn't have separated or well-designed permissions, you can still separate who has access to certain jobs and phases.

Incentivized

• Calendar integration is easy to set up and can make logging time even easier
• Chrome extension is also very handy to track time on the fly
• Tempo-UI is pretty user friendly, like the ability to favorite jira tickets and duplicate time entries.

Incentivized

• Simple to use.
• Easy to set up.
• Easy to add clients, projets and phases.

Incentivized

• Minor things, like changing tabs on list of tickets on the calendar view doesn't reset the scroll so sometimes it looks like you 'lost' your tickets and it can be confusing.

Incentivized

• Lacking basic job reports without considerable time investment.
• Lack of overall reporting and cost per a job metrics.

Incentivized

Harvest wins in a direct comparison in everything except cost. It is more built out, more inclusive, has more third party integrations, and more support than Timeneye does. We selected Timeneye first and for most because of its affordability. We switched over to Harvest as an agency when we outgrow the Timeneye setup.

Incentivized

• great detail for audit and compliance
• insight for individual contributors about where they are spending their time

Incentivized

• Cheapest time tracking platform out there. It allows basic project time tracking and cost per project analysis capabilities.
• It takes so long to report on jobs it might not be worth the cheaper cost.

Incentivized