TestComplete vs. Tricentis Tosca

Tricentis Tosca

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
TestComplete	Score 8.0 out of 10	N/A	TestComplete is a GUI test automation tool that enables users of all skill levels to test the UI of every desktop, web, and mobile application. TestComplete is best suited for testers, automation engineers, and QA teams in any industry.	$2,256 per license
Tricentis Tosca	Score 8.2 out of 10	N/A	Tricentis Tosca provides an approach to test automation that is AI-powered, codeless, and end-to-end so it can test everything in a complex IT landscape, to ensure business processes work flawlessly no matter where changes occurs. Its 160+ technology support helps users test everything at the UI, API and data layer, including virtually any enterprise, custom, homegrown and mobile application. With its model-based approach, Tosca enables business, QA and IT teams to…	N/A

Pricing

TestComplete

Tricentis Tosca

Editions & Modules

Node-Locked Base: 2,256
per license
Node-Locked Pro: 3,950
per license
Float - Base: 5,077
per license
Float - Pro: 7,901
per license

No answers on this topic

Offerings

Pricing Offerings
TestComplete	Tricentis Tosca
Free Trial
Yes	No
Free/Freemium Version
No	No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No	No

Entry-level Setup Fee

No setup fee

Optional

Additional Details

Pay for only the modules needed. TestComplete Pro includes all three modules: desktop, web, and mobile, at a bundled price point, as well as access to the parallel testing engine, TestExecute. TestComplete has additional add-ons, including TestExecute and the Intelligent Quality Add-On.

—

More Pricing Information

Community Pulse
	TestComplete	Tricentis Tosca
Considered Both Products	TestComplete Verified User Anonymous Chose TestComplete SonarQube and Visual Studio Test Professional Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose TestComplete We still use both products in our company, since Postman is mainly used for backend automation and TestComplete for frontend automation. The difference is that via Postman you can easily write tests that send different requests to your server, get the response, and compare them … Incentivized Helpful? JK Jinuraj Kottackel Senior Test Enginner Chose TestComplete I have evaluated Tricentis Tosca and another product along with TestComplete. TestComplete is much better [and more] user friendly. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose TestComplete TestComplete stacks up against them in terms of GUI and seamless performance. It records each and every step and action been performed in the application and produces a detailed report in a well-structured manner. It can connect and access seamlessly among various databases … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose TestComplete For their special field (API & web testing) I choose those products over TestComplete Incentivized Helpful? AP Atul Patil Senior Test Engineer Chose TestComplete Below are the points why we selected TestComplete 1. Better UI. 2. Plenty of validation cases supports i.e. checkpoints. 3. Multiple scripting languages. 4. Better accuracy and robustness. 5. Good documentation and Video tutorials. 6. Great support team. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose TestComplete Based on my evaluation regards to the product cost, useability, the TestComplete came first on my selections. Incentivized Helpful? Michal Ignaczak Senior Test Software Engineer Chose TestComplete TestStand is a much more complex tool than TestComplete and it's for a little bit different solutions I think. For desktop apps I would use the TestComplete, For Mobile / Web -> Python + Behave + Pytest selenium - TestComplete is much overcomplicated and slow! For … Incentivized Helpful? MM Mohammed Mitha CTO (Chief Technical Officer) Chose TestComplete The major advantage over other tools is the ease of use. A chimp will be able to figure out TestComplete whereas the others require extensive coding knowledge Incentivized Helpful? FO Femi Oyewole Team Lead Chose TestComplete I know from using other tools in the past years that TestComplete could be more cost-effective, yet still get the job done. Incentivized Helpful? AM Axel Madode QA Senior Analyst Chose TestComplete TestComplete is more complete than Cypress.io because Cypress.io is only used to complete end-to-end testing for web apps. These two tools are user friendly and easy to use. For the needs of our company, we have chosen TestComplete for the variety of testing applications. Incentivized Helpful? AE alexandre elatmani Manager QA service Chose TestComplete TestComplete was effective and cheaper than quick test Pro Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose TestComplete TestComplete is a robust test automation tool and not for someone who expects to just record and playback. This can be done with [TestComplete], but the strength of the tool is the ability to code complex actions and capturing of objects. The reporting of results is also … Incentivized Helpful? DG Dale Ganus Associate Managing Director Chose TestComplete It has been almost 5 years since we researched products, but TestComplete gave us the best overall advantage to achieve our goals. So, that is why we chose it. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose TestComplete It's been a long time so it may not be a fair assessment, but I don't recall IBM's product being as easy to use or have as many features. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose TestComplete We used before the Coded UI Tests which are in Visual Studio / Azure DevOps, and the tests were impossible to maintain and very very flaky. Then in 2015, we selected TestComplete, as it was clearly the tool with the most feature for desktop UI testing. Selenium was … Incentivized Helpful? PP Paul Porkhovnik QA Engneer Chose TestComplete We evaluate several different products, but TestComplete fits the best for our Windows base application. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose TestComplete We are using Katalon for web-based applications, mainly because our QA engineers have a strong experience with it. But it does not allow precise item identification in Delphi-based applications and that was a show stopper for us. Having received recommendations for … Incentivized Helpful? AK Aravinda Kodihalli Seenaiah Project Lead Chose TestComplete [...] Incentivized Helpful? MK Mohammad Khiabani Senior Quality Assurance Engineer Chose TestComplete Very close evaluations on all tools Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose TestComplete TestComplete was selected after trying multiple product offerings. Initially these product offerings were installed with trail keys, and various factors were weighted and sized based on complexity to install, and ease of use. TestComplete scored higher than any other product … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose TestComplete TestComplete gives the best option of record and playback. Also, it does not have any problem with object recognition just like Selenium. Selenium needs more manual efforts in selecting the object properties and utilizing them. Also, Selenium needs a good command of one coding … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose TestComplete TestComplete stacks up because its UI is easier to use than that of Ranorex Studio. Incentivized Helpful? Ben Fishel-Brown Test Automation & Security Team Lead Chose TestComplete We aren't 100% sure that we will stick with TestComplete for our web-based UI testing for the long haul because Selenium is a bit lighter on the overhead front, but we definitely really like it for testing our standalone applications and utilities. As far as a complete testing … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose TestComplete We use TestExecute together with TestComplete. The ease of use is one of the reasons we have stuck with it for years now. Developers are satisfied due to the time saved with this tool. If you are still hesitating—don’t. We try to find the replacement, but so far can’t because … Incentivized Helpful?	Tricentis Tosca Sushmita Patil Senior Business Analyst Chose Tricentis Tosca Depending on the prices concern and fast execution Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Tricentis Tosca User friendly interface is key to any tool usage. If the features supported by tool is enormous but the interface is not easy to use, then the product will not reach its optimal usage. Tosca scores high numbers with this regard. The documentations and KB articles it supports … Incentivized Helpful? juan eng paw Senior Technical Manager SA Chose Tricentis Tosca UFT was mostly record and replay and Tricentis Tosca best fit our purpose as it was easier to create modules and make quick changes when needed. Overall easier and quicker to make changes to our existing test cases. therefore we haven't used UFT anymore. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Tricentis Tosca Tricentis Tosca has higher stability than Certica Solutions Incentivized Helpful? Yogendra Singh Test Automation Expert Chose Tricentis Tosca As Tricentis Tosca is one of the first tools to implement the model based test automation, it is way ahead of the similar kind of tools. be it creating and innovating new strategies to overcome the existing hurdles faced during automation like, self healing feature is quite … Incentivized Helpful? AB Atanu Biswas Automation and Performance Test Lead Chose Tricentis Tosca Selenium, Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence and ACCELQ Incentivized Helpful? Mouleeswaran Andi E Test Analyst Chose Tricentis Tosca Even though selenium is open source tool we have lot restriction in selenium. Using selenium we can automate only web based application. If we need to automate other application we work with other tools. Maintenance of Selenium code is complex when compare to Tricentis Tosca. … Incentivized Helpful? Anant Joshi Sr. Director Chose Tricentis Tosca The overall user experience and the ease of use while automation ERP system was better in Tricentis Tosca. The integration was seamless especially for SAP and SFDC system. I think the maintenance efforts required in Tricentis Tosca is very less as compared to Katalon. The … Incentivized Helpful? Sneha Gangan Manore Senior Analyst Chose Tricentis Tosca This tool covers all from functional testing to rpa and mobile testing cloud based testing visual testing and accessibility testing is easily possible. It is easy to implement start work in less time. All the testing kinds performance can also be tested and customized reports … Incentivized Helpful? Ganesh Muralidharan Global Delivery Head Chose Tricentis Tosca Micro Focus UFT requires coding skills. Worksoft supports SAP very well but web app automation was challenging. Provar is only for Salesforce automation. Selenium required an automation engineer with Java knowledge and framework dependency. Tricentis Tosca did not require any … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Tricentis Tosca Good on flexibility and provided much option to cover different aspects of automation testing. Incentivized Helpful? BW Bernd Weigl Teamleiter Quality Assurance Chose Tricentis Tosca Best Module and Scan approach, Libs rule, and PL Libs are the best things ever! Incentivized Helpful? Nikhil Puniyani Software Engineer Chose Tricentis Tosca As our product required wide rage of testing start from web testing to desktop automation also, we gone through the feature provided by Tosca and decided it will be good fit for end to end automation. Even though from our team no one is aware of how to use the tools, the guide … Incentivized Helpful? Vinayak Bandewar Test Architect Chose Tricentis Tosca Other tools are focused on limited applications or technologies. With Tricentis Tosca you can do almost everything which makes it one-stop solution for all needs.Tosca is codeless vs others which requires coding. Tosca has inbuilt repository which other tools lack. Tosca also … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Tricentis Tosca Tricentis Tosca provides a uniform interface for al testers and avoids the requirement for coding. Tricentis Tosca also offers test capabilities across the enterprise that other tools do not. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Tricentis Tosca Tricentis Tosca is better as the first testing tool to introduce in a news organization. I believe it's the testing tool that is the easiest to introduce and adopt. It is oriented toward manual testers that would like to start automation but it is less oriented toward … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Tricentis Tosca Mostly the ease of use from day one by introducing the no-code approach for teams with non-technical contributors. Also, the amount of technologies it covers is greater than other tools that are specialized in web-only or API, for example. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Tricentis Tosca Tricentis Tosca has more functionality and is easier to implement. It also has more compatibility with other applications, and the support is much more responsive. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Tricentis Tosca Tricentis Tosca is codeless and therefore easier to use. It's a great tool for people that would start doing automation and have no coding background. It seems like it has the same capabilities as other test automation suites but I felt it lacked a bit of capabilities on the … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Tricentis Tosca Tricentis Tosca is an easy to use tool which can apply to almost any business process. The customer support program appears to be a program which will put the use of the tool on track with our protfolios. Ease of implementation and total application capabilities across … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Tricentis Tosca Because of it's great support for cross browser/cross device and devops, this really makes the cut against it's peers. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Tricentis Tosca I have really minimum exposure with QTP and ALM, barely 2 months or so, for this reason I would not like to comment on how Tosca stacks up against them, but something that I really like about Selenium is that it is really simple and easy to setup, doesn't require a heavy … Incentivized Helpful? Raghuram Rangamani Associate Project Manager Chose Tricentis Tosca Before going in for TOSCA we tried to use Selenium / UFT. But TOSCA stacked much ahead than other tools. Incentivized Helpful? DL david leo Developer Chose Tricentis Tosca Its easy to use and reliable Its easy to use and reliableIts easy to use and reliableIts easy to use and reliableIts easy to use and reliableIts easy to use and reliableIts easy to use and reliable Its easy to use and reliableIts easy to use and reliableIts easy to use and … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Tricentis Tosca qTest is the "brain" of the suite. You can use just Tricentis Tosca and can be enough to have results, but if you want have the management of executions, results and even manual test, this is your app. Incentivized Helpful?

Features

TestComplete

Tricentis Tosca

Automation Testing

Comparison of Automation Testing features of Product A and Product B
	TestComplete - Ratings	Tricentis Tosca 8.3 Ratings 2% below category average
Record and Automate	00 Ratings	7.70 Ratings
Multi-Browser Testing	00 Ratings	8.70 Ratings
Mobile Testing	00 Ratings	7.40 Ratings
Test Scheduling	00 Ratings	8.70 Ratings
Test Management	00 Ratings	8.70 Ratings
CI/CD Tool Integration	00 Ratings	7.90 Ratings
Parallel Testing	00 Ratings	8.70 Ratings
Object Recognition	00 Ratings	8.80 Ratings
Data-Driven Testing	00 Ratings	8.80 Ratings
Real Device Testing	00 Ratings	7.90 Ratings
Testing Reports & Analytics	00 Ratings	8.20 Ratings

Best Alternatives
	TestComplete	Tricentis Tosca
Small Businesses	BrowserStack Score 8.6 out of 10	BrowserStack Score 8.6 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies	ReadyAPI Score 7.0 out of 10	ReadyAPI Score 7.0 out of 10
Enterprises	ReadyAPI Score 7.0 out of 10	ignio AIOps Score 8.1 out of 10
All Alternatives	View all alternatives	View all alternatives

User Ratings
	TestComplete	Tricentis Tosca
Likelihood to Recommend	7.0 (0 ratings)	8.3 (0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew	8.1 (0 ratings)	7.7 (0 ratings)
Usability	7.8 (0 ratings)	3.6 (0 ratings)
Support Rating	6.6 (0 ratings)	8.2 (0 ratings)
Implementation Rating	6.7 (0 ratings)	- (0 ratings)

User Testimonials
	TestComplete	Tricentis Tosca
Likelihood to Recommend	Best suited to smaller unit test or tests broken up, couple of forms at a time Not suited - larger regressions test involving multiple systems. - my main regression involving payments has been unsuccessful for the last 3 years despite all working fine separately and while being watched Verified User Anonymous Read full review	Tricentis Tosca is well suited for packaged applications like SAP, Salesforce, Workday, etc. It also works well with API testing and Web UI testing. Tosca is highly suited for Projects which require a high level of collaboration between team members across different locations. It's less suited for mobile automation, Reporting, and test scenarios with high input data. Incentivized Vinayak Bandewar Test Architect Read full review
Pros	TestComplete is great for working with our non-web applications. TestComplete allows us to interface with our web application in a robust way. Despite the age of our architecture, TestComplete handles the old stuff that's been around a while as well as the newer technology when we are able to implement it. Incentivized Ben Fishel-Brown Test Automation & Security Team Lead Read full review	Tosca provides a one-stop solution for your test-automation needs. One can use it to automate testing of desktop (web/stand-alone) applications, Mobile(Native as well as Web) applications etc. It is a great tool since it not only helps in test automation but also in maintaining a suite for Manual testing. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Cons	Would love to see TC be a plugin for Visual Studio. Instead of VBScript or JavaScript, to use C# or VB.NET Easier to set up with iOS. Android is not bad but iOS seems slow and confusing to get up and running Built-in PDF reading support, built in Excel API Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	Documentation - struggled multiple times with features not explained very well, or not explained at all The only support is on Tricentis Forums, where, sometimes, based on 'luck' - you will open a support case, and wait few days until you get the chance to speak with someone from Tricentis and show case your issue Incentivized AI Alexandru Cristian Ion QA Engineer Read full review
Likelihood to Renew	We have bigger test automation pack using test complete at the same time we also think this is not good performing tool for large number of test automation scripts. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	We aim to renew Tosca for our organization. What we lose in license cost is gained by having employee that do not need programming background. We also recoup a lot of the cost on the rapidity of automation. Only the support we might not use as much. I believe Tosca is here to stay at our organization Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Usability	It is usable when you become accustomed to its quirks. Not using it for two months and then you need to re-learn the quirks for some features (but some quirks are so awful that they will never fade from your memory). So, when using it regularly, it is possible to be quite productive, if no big correction in name mapping is needed. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	It can be a challenge for new users who have never used an automation tool. For example, it is hard to understand the layout of the screen and where to find how to update the data. The interface can be overwhelming at first. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Support Rating	Some bugs were quickly resolved, but most UX quirks of the tool are just marked "as designed". No follow up for enhancement request. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	Tricentis team was very supportive. Support is expensive but they helped us at many level. Setting up timeline, implementation, precise questions on automation challenges. We had an account manager and technical people we could as to talk to. Support was generally timely and helping. They often proposed to come on site to help us which would cost more but could be helpful Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
In-Person Training	No answers on this topic	It would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is better Incentivized david leo Developer Read full review
Online Training	No answers on this topic	okIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is better Incentivized david leo Developer Read full review
Implementation Rating	If you develop a mobile application and your testing process goes in cloud, probably you will face a problem - how to implement a stable connection between your mobile devices and testing servers Incentivized Yury Vakhatov Test Automation Engineer Read full review	No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered	TestComplete stacks up against them in terms of GUI and seamless performance. It records each and every step and action been performed in the application and produces a detailed report in a well-structured manner. It can connect and access seamlessly among various databases directly to speed up the testing process. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	User friendly interface is key to any tool usage. If the features supported by tool is enormous but the interface is not easy to use, then the product will not reach its optimal usage. Tosca scores high numbers with this regard. The documentations and KB articles it supports are very helpful and allows us to solve our issues independently. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Return on Investment	Improved product quality overall, since automating tedious tests frees up time and is not prone to fatigue When getting started - depending on the complexity of the software/UI tested - it can be a time sink before it brings actual value, and changes to the structure of the UI need to be communicated early, so the changes can be implemented on time to run the automation Once set up, the maintenance cost is low, and the automation frees up a lot of resources especially in an agile environment where there are a lot of releases that would need regression tests. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	It really had a very good impact on our ROI. We were able to automate most of the apps and layers with in it and get a very short execution time which led to increased releases with in short span of time. Time to market really improved and efficiency of developing scripts was not too bad. With built in test dashboards, it was easy to pull metrics and share the insights with management. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
ScreenShots		Tricentis Tosca Screenshots