TherapyNotes, headquartered in Horsham, PA, offers a practice management platform specifically for behavioral health and therapy providers.
$49
per month
Therabill by WebPT
Score 6.6 out of 10
N/A
Therabill, by WebPT is a web based electronic billing and practice management system designed for independent healthcare providers, billing services, or healthcare facilities. Therabill is specifically designed for behavioral, developmental, occupational, physical, speech and other healthcare therapists.
N/A
Pricing
TherapyNotes
Therabill by WebPT
Editions & Modules
Solo
$49.00
per month
Group
$59.00
per month
Enterprise
$59.00
per month
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
TherapyNotes
Therabill by WebPT
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
$199 one-time fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
TherapyNotes
Therabill by WebPT
Considered Both Products
TherapyNotes
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose TherapyNotes
Therapy notes is easier to work with across all domains. Faster and more effective when it comes to writing and entering notes.
TherapyNotes is a bit less intuitive than some of these other EHRs I have utilized but it is also easier to use for me as the provider and user-friendly for English speaking clients. It is also more cost-effective to use TherapyNotes with everything including merchant services …
Our previous billing software was Tiger Misys and Payerpath by Allscripts. Both were very antiquated means of managing claims and payments. Therabill by WebPT at least is modern and functions far more simply and is more user-friendly. That said, we have since moved to Prompt …
Compulink was not a good thing at all. Therabill is much better.
Kareo was better in some way, but worse in others. We moved to Therabill for lower cost and because it was bought by WebPT and we figured they would be putting all improvements toward that.
Therabill is great for small clinic practices because the functions save time, organize billing, and make tracking financials much easier. Reports are easily accessible and easy to read, saving time with tracking . I think that Therabill is suitable for large and small clinics, time saver! I can't really see a scenario where a clinic would not benefit from Therabill.
Spanish documents are not available. There is not a way to use Spanish documents that can be filled out online like the English documents; instead, the practice must upload a PDF into the Library, share with client via portal and have then print, fill out manually, and upload for organization review and approval.
Sync feature from Client History Form is inconsistent. It may work with some clients but not with all. Sometimes the user has to completely log out and log back in in order to obtain partially parsed information to use in a treatment plan or psychotherapy note.
While knowledgeable, support agents don't seem to speak English as a primary language, so communication can be difficult at times
I feel billing secondary insurance is really tedious, having to submit it patient by patient
Handling claim denials, corrected claims, and resubmissions is incredibly tedious and difficult, in my experience, requiring a great deal of time and moving across the site to handle one claim at a time
The UI is fairly user-friendly and finding what you need on the site isn't that difficult. Once set up, EDI and ERA receipt works smoothly and payment posting from ERAs is straightforward and simple for the most part. But handling claim denials, corrections, and resubmissions is incredibly difficult. It is not only difficult to find and sort them, but to send them out for reprocessing as well.
Our previous billing software was Tiger Misys and Payerpath by Allscripts. Both were very antiquated means of managing claims and payments. Therabill by WebPT at least is modern and functions far more simply and is more user-friendly. That said, we have since moved to Prompt EMR, which while the user interface is less intuitive, the functionality is far more streamlined and efficient for a clinic of our size.
Saves time specifically with entering notes which means I can spend more time seeing clients.
Does not have the ability to enter dual caregivers. Challenging for parents who are divorced and signatures are required from both parents. It is not effective to have two separate portals for the same child.