TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Jenkins

    Score8.3 out of 10
    N/AJenkins is an open source automation server. Jenkins provides hundreds of plugins to support building, deploying and automating any project. As an extensible automation server, Jenkins can be used as a simple CI server or turned into a continuous delivery hub for any project.N/A

    Travis CI

    Score7.3 out of 10
    N/ATravis CI is an open source continuous integration platform, that enables users to run and test simultaneously on different environments, and automatically catch code failures and bugs.

    $69

    per month 1 concurrent job

    Pricing
    JenkinsTravis CI
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    1 Concurrent Job Plan
    $69
    per month
    Bootstrap
    $69
    per month 1 concurrent job
    2 Concurrent Jobs Plan
    $129
    per month
    Startup
    $129
    per month 2 concurrent jobs
    5 Concurrent Jobs Plan
    $249
    per month
    Small Business
    $249
    per month 5 concurrent jobs
    Premium
    $489
    per month 10 concurrent jobs
    Platinum
    $794+
    per month starting at 15 concurrent jobs
    Free Plan
    Free
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    JenkinsTravis CI
    Free Trial
    NoYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    YesYes
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional DetailsDiscount available for annual pricing.
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    JenkinsTravis CI
    Considered Both Products
    Open Source
    Chose Jenkins
    Travis CI and AppVeyor are good services that provide rudimentary support for builds, but they focus on Linux/OSX and Windows respectively, meaning that cross-platform builds will need to use both services. They are free for open source projects on GitHub, so they are seen …
    Incentivized
    Chose Jenkins
    Overall, Jenkins is the easiest platform for someone who has no experience to come in and use effectively. We can get a junior engineer into Jenkins, give them access, and point them in the right direction with minimal hand-holding. The competing products I have used (TravisCI/G…
    Incentivized
    Chose Jenkins
    Originally Jenkins was selected because it was the best around, but it has since been outclassed by more specific services or cloud-based services and tools that will do all of the heavy lifting for you. Jenkins still has a use case - but it's hard to argue the additional …
    Incentivized
    Chose Jenkins
    Jenkins is the only tool I would consider using for CTCI deployment. Its plugins make it easy to customize to any environment you can conjure up and will always be custom fit to your needs as a DevOps engineer. Other tools have better support but lack the customizability and …
    Incentivized
    Chose Jenkins
    Travis is on open source it provides great flexibility with github and open source projects. However, jenkins have more plugins available
    Incentivized
    Chose Jenkins
    Jenkins does a much better job of working with interpreted languages, and has a much larger plugin base.
    Incentivized
    Chose Jenkins
    Basically all those CI/CD tools provides the same set of tooling. SaaS solutions have a pre set pool of languages and containers you can use, but hey also are less flexible because they will not allow you to do advance configurations or setups you may need.
    With jenkins you have …
    Incentivized
    Chose Jenkins
    Jenkins is a bit more technically rigorous than either of the other products, but once you begin to dive deeper into the software, you'll quickly realize that this learning curve is worth it. It had more customization and interfaces with more software services than the other …
    Incentivized
    Travis CI
    Chose Travis CI
    Jenkins is probably the leading choice for automation and has loads of features and a large community behind it, but it can be overkill for many projects. It also has more of a web 1.0 look and interface.
    CircleCI is another similar big competitor, but cannot compete with Travis …
    Incentivized
    Chose Travis CI
    Jenkins is much more complicated to configure and start using. Although, one you have done that, it's extremely powerful and full of features. Maybe many more than Travis CI. As per TeamCity, I would never go back to using it. It's also complicated to configure but it is not …
    Incentivized
    Chose Travis CI
    There are a few other options out there, CircleCI, Codeship and Wrecker would be a few good ones I can also recommend, each one has its particularity but I believe Travis has the best interface and flexibility of all of them.
    I'd recommend trying them all and seeing which one …
    Incentivized
    Chose Travis CI
    TravisCI is the first choice for open source projects.
    Incentivized
    Chose Travis CI
    Much easier to navigate web interface. Setup and configuration is much easier and straightforward via the yml config file.
    Incentivized
    Chose Travis CI
    There are a number of alternatives to Travis CI, but Travis remains the most popular, since it was one of the first to show up. It has a lot of examples, support for building dozens of languages, and good documentation. Significant portions of the system are open source, so you …
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    User Ratings
    JenkinsTravis CI
    Likelihood to Recommend
    7.5
    (72 ratings)
    6.0
    (8 ratings)
    Usability
    7.9
    (6 ratings)
    5.0
    (1 ratings)
    Performance
    8.9
    (6 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Support Rating
    6.6
    (6 ratings)
    4.0
    (1 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    6.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)