TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

OpenText UFT One vs. Tricentis Tosca

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    OpenText UFT One

    Score7.6 out of 10
    N/AUnified Functional Testing (UFT, formerly known as HP UFT and before that QuickTest Professional or HP QTP) is a functional and performance testing tool acquired by Micro Focus from Hewlett-Packard Enterprise, now from OpenText.N/A

    Tricentis Tosca

    Score8.1 out of 10
    N/ATricentis Tosca provides an approach to test automation that is AI-powered, codeless, and end-to-end so it can test everything in a complex IT landscape, to ensure business processes work flawlessly no matter where changes occurs. Its 160+ technology support helps users test everything at the UI, API and data layer, including virtually any enterprise, custom, homegrown and mobile application. With its model-based approach, Tosca enables business, QA and IT teams to…N/A
    Pricing
    OpenText UFT OneTricentis Tosca
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    OpenText UFT OneTricentis Tosca
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
    Additional Details
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    OpenText UFT OneTricentis Tosca
    Considered Both Products
    OpenText
    Chose OpenText UFT One
    UFT has the advantages of supporting different types of technologies. Different competitive tools were not able to support the wide range of technologies which UFT does. UFT has a strong history and has been ranked one among all the Test Automation tools for quite some time. …
    Incentivized
    Chose OpenText UFT One
    Most of the test tools are similar in nature to what they do. Every tool has its own quirks, making them necessary to understand how and what they do, before we get to start using them; which also happens to be the key to good automation testing. Considering the HP toolset, …
    Incentivized
    Tricentis
    Chose Tricentis Tosca
    UFT was mostly record and replay and Tricentis Tosca best fit our purpose as it was easier to create modules and make quick changes when needed. Overall easier and quicker to make changes to our existing test cases. therefore we haven't used UFT anymore.
    Incentivized
    Chose Tricentis Tosca
    This tool covers all from functional testing to rpa and mobile testing cloud based testing visual testing and accessibility testing is easily possible. It is easy to implement start work in less time. All the testing kinds performance can also be tested and customized reports …
    Incentivized
    Chose Tricentis Tosca
    Micro Focus UFT requires coding skills. Worksoft supports SAP very well but web app automation was challenging. Provar is only for Salesforce automation. Selenium required an automation engineer with Java knowledge and framework dependency. Tricentis Tosca did not require any …
    Incentivized
    Chose Tricentis Tosca
    Other tools are focused on limited applications or technologies. With Tricentis Tosca you can do almost everything which makes it one-stop solution for all needs.Tosca is codeless vs others which requires coding. Tosca has inbuilt repository which other tools lack. Tosca also …
    Incentivized
    Chose Tricentis Tosca
    Tricentis Tosca is better as the first testing tool to introduce in a news organization. I believe it's the testing tool that is the easiest to introduce and adopt. It is oriented toward manual testers that would like to start automation but it is less oriented toward …
    Incentivized
    Chose Tricentis Tosca
    Mostly the ease of use from day one by introducing the no-code approach for teams with non-technical contributors. Also, the amount of technologies it covers is greater than other tools that are specialized in web-only or API, for example.
    Incentivized
    Chose Tricentis Tosca
    Tricentis Tosca is codeless and therefore easier to use. It's a great tool for people that would start doing automation and have no coding background. It seems like it has the same capabilities as other test automation suites but I felt it lacked a bit of capabilities on the …
    Incentivized
    Chose Tricentis Tosca
    Because of it's great support for cross browser/cross device and devops, this really makes the cut against it's peers.
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Features
    OpenText UFT OneTricentis Tosca
    Automation Testing
    Comparison of Automation Testing features of OpenText UFT One and Tricentis Tosca
    Feature
    OpenText UFT One
    -
    Ratings
    Tricentis Tosca
    8.3
    4 Ratings
    Record and Automate00 Ratings7.74 Ratings
    Multi-Browser Testing00 Ratings8.74 Ratings
    Mobile Testing00 Ratings7.43 Ratings
    Test Scheduling00 Ratings8.74 Ratings
    Test Management00 Ratings8.74 Ratings
    CI/CD Tool Integration00 Ratings8.04 Ratings
    Parallel Testing00 Ratings8.74 Ratings
    Object Recognition00 Ratings8.84 Ratings
    Data-Driven Testing00 Ratings8.84 Ratings
    Real Device Testing00 Ratings7.93 Ratings
    Testing Reports & Analytics00 Ratings8.24 Ratings
    User Ratings
    OpenText UFT OneTricentis Tosca
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.0
    (11 ratings)
    8.3
    (19 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.7
    (2 ratings)
    Usability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    3.6
    (13 ratings)
    Support Rating
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    8.2
    (1 ratings)