TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Selenium

    Score8.1 out of 10
    N/ASelenium is open source software for browser automation, primarily used for functional, load, or performance testing of applications.N/A

    Tricentis Tosca

    Score8.1 out of 10
    N/ATricentis Tosca provides an approach to test automation that is AI-powered, codeless, and end-to-end so it can test everything in a complex IT landscape, to ensure business processes work flawlessly no matter where changes occurs. Its 160+ technology support helps users test everything at the UI, API and data layer, including virtually any enterprise, custom, homegrown and mobile application. With its model-based approach, Tosca enables business, QA and IT teams to…N/A
    Pricing
    SeleniumTricentis Tosca
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    SeleniumTricentis Tosca
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
    Additional Details
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    SeleniumTricentis Tosca
    Considered Both Products
    Open Source
    Chose Selenium
    Customers are always spending less cost on tools and prefer open-source tools which leverage all applications Can be tailored your framework in selenium according to application Moreover CI/CD pipeline is easy in selenium compared to other tools Can be built custom test …
    Incentivized
    Chose Selenium
    Selenium is way better than those two as it's free and has great community support.
    Incentivized
    Chose Selenium
    UFT is a paid tool from microfocus and able to automated alomsts all platforms but there is Fee for licensed versions software. TOSCA is also a paid tool from Tricentis which does not require coding skills from tester and implements mode based automation. where as selenium is …
    Incentivized
    Tricentis
    Chose Tricentis Tosca
    Even though Selenium is open source tool we have lot restriction in Selenium. Using Selenium we can automate only web based application. If we need to automate other application we work with other tools. Maintenance of Selenium code is complex when compare to Tricentis Tosca. …
    Incentivized
    Chose Tricentis Tosca
    Micro Focus UFT requires coding skills. Worksoft supports SAP very well but web app automation was challenging. Provar is only for Salesforce automation. Selenium required an automation engineer with Java knowledge and framework dependency. Tricentis Tosca did not require any …
    Incentivized
    Chose Tricentis Tosca
    I have really minimum exposure with QTP and ALM, barely 2 months or so, for this reason I would not like to comment on how Tosca stacks up against them, but something that I really like about Selenium is that it is really simple and easy to setup, doesn't require a heavy …
    Incentivized
    Chose Tricentis Tosca
    UFT was mostly record and replay and Tricentis Tosca best fit our purpose as it was easier to create modules and make quick changes when needed. Overall easier and quicker to make changes to our existing test cases. therefore we haven't used UFT anymore.
    Incentivized
    Chose Tricentis Tosca
    As Tricentis Tosca is one of the first tools to implement the model based test automation, it is way ahead of the similar kind of tools. be it creating and innovating new strategies to overcome the existing hurdles faced during automation like, self healing feature is quite …
    Incentivized
    Chose Tricentis Tosca
    Good on flexibility and provided much option to cover different aspects of automation testing.
    Incentivized
    Chose Tricentis Tosca
    Best Module and Scan approach, Libs rule, and PL Libs are the best things ever!
    Incentivized
    Chose Tricentis Tosca
    As our product required wide rage of testing start from web testing to desktop automation also, we gone through the feature provided by Tosca and decided it will be good fit for end to end automation.
    Even though from our team no one is aware of how to use the tools, the guide …
    Incentivized
    Chose Tricentis Tosca
    Tricentis Tosca provides a uniform interface for al testers and avoids the requirement for coding. Tricentis Tosca also offers test capabilities across the enterprise that other tools do not.
    Incentivized
    Chose Tricentis Tosca
    Mostly the ease of use from day one by introducing the no-code approach for teams with non-technical contributors. Also, the amount of technologies it covers is greater than other tools that are specialized in web-only or API, for example.
    Incentivized
    Chose Tricentis Tosca
    Because of it's great support for cross browser/cross device and devops, this really makes the cut against it's peers.
    Incentivized
    Chose Tricentis Tosca
    Before going in for TOSCA we tried to use Selenium / UFT. But TOSCA stacked much ahead than other tools.
    Incentivized
    Chose Tricentis Tosca
    Its easy to use and reliable Its easy to use and reliableIts easy to use and reliableIts easy to use and reliableIts easy to use and reliableIts easy to use and reliableIts easy to use and reliable Its easy to use and reliableIts easy to use and reliableIts easy to use and …
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    TrustRadius Insights
    SeleniumTricentis Tosca
    Highlights

    TrustRadius
    Research Team Insight
    Published

    Selenium and Tricentis Tosca are competing test automation solutions. Selenium is open source, and the most popular script-based test automation tool in the world; users work in Selenium IDE, which supports its own scripting language, Selenese. Tricentis Tosca is available at cost but provides a scriptless, no-code, model-based approach to test automation. Selenium and Tricentis Tosca present similar automation features, but they can be used together in a test suite by test management tools such as Tricentis qTest.

    Selenium and Tosca are both used predominantly in enterprises, however Selenium is often deployed at mid-size companies as well. Given that it is open source, Selenium can be learned by anyone willing to take the time.

    Features

    There are many reasons to deploy Tosca or Selenium (or both) in agile test suites.

    Beyond simply being open source, Selenium can support tests written in a variety of programming languages including Java, Ruby, Ruby, C#, PHP, etc., as well as its own Selense language, making it accessible to devs. It supports testing a variety of web UI components, and supports cross-browser testing. Despite being scripted, Selenium is relatively easy to use, and also supports parallel testing.

    The primary reason for using Tosca is its major selling point: it is scriptless, or no-code. As easy as Selenium might be, it still requires scripting. Users enjoy how easy Tosca makes it to design tests, and how easy it is to integrate Tosca into a CI / CD pipeline. Also, Tosca can be used to test web, cloud, and desktop applications.Tosca can automate API testing, and offers integrations with Postman and SoapUI. Selenium cannot be used to automate API testing.

    Limitations

    A few reasons exist to consider looking elsewhere for a test automation tool.

    Selenium cannot be used to automate testing of desktop applications, only web applications through browser automations. Because it is scripted, it is accessible only to programmers, and because it is open source it lacks enterprise support of any kind. It may be easy to use for what it is, but learning to use it is a barrier for many. Selenium also lacks powerful internal reporting features.

    Tosca’s downsides are few, but first among them is the cost, particularly when open source and free alternatives exist. Also, because it is scriptless, Tosca has the opposite problem Selenium has: competent programmers are sometimes frustrated by it, citing a lack of flexibility and control for complex test automations. There is also a learning curve to arrive at fully understanding the UI.

    Pricing

    Selenium is open source and free to use. Tricentis Tosca pricing is not published. Tricentis offers cloud licensing which provides a testing environment hosted by Tricentis, and on-premise licensing. Tricentis suggests cloud licensing can reduce costs because it allows the user’s partners in testing to use testing infrastructure without having to provision additional server resources. Tricentis also provides checkout licenses (i.e. temporary use licenses for a pool of potential users held for specific use cases), or custom licensing for special and limited scenarios.

    Features
    SeleniumTricentis Tosca
    Automation Testing
    Comparison of Automation Testing features of Selenium and Tricentis Tosca
    Feature
    Selenium
    -
    Ratings
    Tricentis Tosca
    8.3
    4 Ratings
    Record and Automate00 Ratings7.74 Ratings
    Multi-Browser Testing00 Ratings8.74 Ratings
    Mobile Testing00 Ratings7.43 Ratings
    Test Scheduling00 Ratings8.74 Ratings
    Test Management00 Ratings8.74 Ratings
    CI/CD Tool Integration00 Ratings8.04 Ratings
    Parallel Testing00 Ratings8.74 Ratings
    Object Recognition00 Ratings8.84 Ratings
    Data-Driven Testing00 Ratings8.84 Ratings
    Real Device Testing00 Ratings7.93 Ratings
    Testing Reports & Analytics00 Ratings8.24 Ratings
    User Ratings
    SeleniumTricentis Tosca
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.2
    (55 ratings)
    8.3
    (19 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    9.2
    (6 ratings)
    7.7
    (2 ratings)
    Usability
    8.8
    (6 ratings)
    3.6
    (13 ratings)
    Support Rating
    8.3
    (11 ratings)
    8.2
    (1 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    9.0
    (3 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)