Varicent vs. Xactly Commission Expense Accounting

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Varicent
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
From quotas to sales and compensation, Varicent helps revenue leaders in enterprise organizations chart a more effective, connected path to revenue by providing vital data, insights, and sales go-to-market planning tools.N/A
Xactly Commission Expense Accounting
Score 7.6 out of 10
N/A
Xactly Commission Expense Accounting™ (CEA) delivers a commission expense management solution—with full capitalization and amortization capabilities—that lets companies monitor performance obligations and ensure compliance with ASC 606 and IFRS 15 standards. Their Intelligent Revenue Platform enables Xactly to align planning, performance, and prediction functions into one platform.N/A
Pricing
VaricentXactly Commission Expense Accounting
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
VaricentXactly Commission Expense Accounting
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsContact Xactly for a demo and pricing.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
VaricentXactly Commission Expense Accounting
Considered Both Products
Varicent
Chose Varicent
Initial comparison analysis was done but no insights into the outcome and why Varicent was chosen over Xactly
Chose Varicent
Previous companies used ERP solutions. Now, here for commission calculation, we selected Varicent.
Chose Varicent
Varicent is the leader in the ICM space because it is scalable and is always making improvements / enhancements based on customer input. However in my opinion based on my own experience, all ICM providers operate similarly in that they over-promise to get a customer's business …
Chose Varicent
Varicent was selected 1) because we had an incompetent independent contractor managing the process; 2) Varicent misrepresented both scale & cost as well as support.
Chose Varicent
Budget-wise, reporting, and System availability-wise. Varicent hands down provides a better environment for compensation deliverables and management reporting which includes all of the financial needs we require. The following components were able to determine our pick. …
Chose Varicent
Varicent is the only tool I have experience with.
Chose Varicent
I used Appx and Optymyze in my previous organization and I found out of all the tools I have used Appx was the best, then Optymyze and then Varicent.
Chose Varicent
Varicent is an all-in-one platform that provides database access, UI, and ability to create calculations, reports, etc. from data. I like this better than traditional databases as it takes what would've been additional coding and makes it an easy process to go through with just …
Chose Varicent
Varicent was the best combination of cost, features, and scalable
Chose Varicent
I just use varicent as for this tipe of application
Chose Varicent
Varicent outperforms other Incentive Compensation Management I have used in the past. Its user interface is far more user friendly, data is more accurate and up to date. The whole look and feel is modern and polished.
Chose Varicent
I was not part of the team at that time.
Chose Varicent
We have both PeopleSoft and Varicent. The tools are used for similar process (compensation review ) but on different entities with different (not compatible) requirements.
Chose Varicent
The base of the logic was advanced and already created
Chose Varicent
In 2015, we used a scorecard containing 80 attributes in our review of Oracle, Callidus, and Xactly & Varicent. Oracle did not have true self serve capabilities- programming was heavily required, not intuitive, out of the box functionality was limited. Callidus & Xactly could …
Chose Varicent
All good products. When we initially chose Varicent it was the most flexible tool and price was competitive
Chose Varicent
We haven't used incentive compensation schemes previously, but using Varicent has removed errors and made the compensation process more efficient.

Chose Varicent
Varicent was pre-selected before I joined the organization.
Xactly Commission Expense Accounting
Chose Xactly Commission Expense Accounting
CEA was easy to use, easy to implement, and at the right price.
Chose Xactly Commission Expense Accounting
We selected Xactly CEA for ASC 606.
Chose Xactly Commission Expense Accounting
Obero is much more user-friendly and updated from the older versions.
Features
VaricentXactly Commission Expense Accounting
Sales ICM
Comparison of Sales ICM features of Product A and Product B
Varicent
6.7
Ratings
10% below category average
Xactly Commission Expense Accounting
-
Ratings
Sales compensation plan creation7.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Complex sales crediting7.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Sales compensation process automation7.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Incentive auditing/regulation compliance6.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Sales compensation dashboards & forecasting6.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Incentive modeling6.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Agile incentive strategy6.50 Ratings00 Ratings
ICM mobile visibility6.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Varicent
-
Ratings
Xactly Commission Expense Accounting
7.3
Ratings
13% below category average
Single sign-on capability00 Ratings7.30 Ratings
Role-based user permissions00 Ratings7.30 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Varicent
-
Ratings
Xactly Commission Expense Accounting
6.4
Ratings
21% below category average
Dashboards00 Ratings1.80 Ratings
Standard reports00 Ratings8.70 Ratings
Custom reports00 Ratings8.70 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Product A and Product B
Varicent
-
Ratings
Xactly Commission Expense Accounting
4.7
Ratings
49% below category average
Multi-currency support00 Ratings6.40 Ratings
Multi-division support00 Ratings6.40 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations00 Ratings9.80 Ratings
Configurable Accounting00 Ratings1.80 Ratings
Centralized Rules Framework00 Ratings1.80 Ratings
Standardized Processes00 Ratings1.80 Ratings
Best Alternatives
VaricentXactly Commission Expense Accounting
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

QuickBooks Self-Employed (discontinued)
QuickBooks Self-Employed (discontinued)
Score 8.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Everstage
Everstage
Score 9.4 out of 10
Zoho Books
Zoho Books
Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Everstage
Everstage
Score 9.4 out of 10
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
Score 10.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
VaricentXactly Commission Expense Accounting
Likelihood to Recommend
7.3
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
4.8
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
7.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Availability
5.2
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
5.8
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
6.8
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
In-Person Training
7.7
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Online Training
7.7
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
6.8
(0 ratings)
9.8
(0 ratings)
Configurability
5.2
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
4.3
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
6.8
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
5.9
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
5.9
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
VaricentXactly Commission Expense Accounting
Likelihood to Recommend
For the use cases we have at the bank, ICM is a perfect solution. For any bank or institution that has similar requirements, ICM would be a perfect solution. But I also think for any use case that has any sort of incentives based on Sales done, this would work amazing, as both Calculations and reports are handled by ICM very well; it's an all-in-one solution, I feel like.
Read full review
Well suited if the company has an ICM solution that can produce accurate data on a timely basis. Not well suited for companies where commission calculations are not automated. Not well suited for companies with frequent plan changes.
Read full review
Pros
  • Flexibility - Varicent is not template based. You can implement the model specifically for your organisation.
  • Scalability - Since it is not stick to templates you are able to expand the model for other domains as well.
  • Reporting - Several ways of reporting are possible and each has their own benefit/purpose.
  • Strong/Powerfull Calculation Engine delivering fast results/speed to insight
  • User Interface is minimized to what you need and is not showing off all the functions it can "also" do
  • Strong audittrail
  • Appears to be almost unlimited in what you are able to create
Read full review
  • Amortization & capitalization.
  • Follow set rules defining when/how certain payments are expensed.
Read full review
Cons
  • Automated rebuild Indexing of tables and calcs, or next best thing, automated reports to list what should have its index rebuilt.
  • To have the functionality for a conditional entry on the ICM scheduler. E.g. if ICM table has fieldx = 'Y' then we run a specific row in the ICM scheduler else it's skipped.
  • The ability to download data in csv, Excel … from the "History Viewer" of tables that have changes tracked.
Read full review
  • Not possible to make back-end changes to amortization schedules independently (for example, if departments need to be changed).
  • Impossible to change rules without customer support, for example, if a new plan is added.
  • Have to run separate amortization schedules for each subsidiary rather than at a consolidated level.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Varicent is a system you build for your unique needs and business objectives. Once this is in place you can adjust and change accordingly. This system has the flexibility to change in correlation with the needs of your business. From simple viewing adjustments to changing the whole landscape of your operations this system can be modified in whatever direction necessary. Also with the growing popularity of handheld devices this system is at a huge advantage by being accessible from the Ipad
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
Any calculations can be implemented as there are hardly any limitations on complexity. However, online real-time usability is lacking - a simple user enters, and the system calculates work in a way that it is in the browser and hence still needs overnight to be properly reflected in the batch calculations and backend tables.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Reliability and Availability
Never went down in last 3 years that I worked with it (every hour of the day basically). That is a 10 in my book.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Performance
All is fast, but with API's it is sometimes slower due to the application we are pulling data from. Reports are loaded directly or within seconds and our reports are very detailed with many columns and rows.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Giving a 10 would suggest there is no room for improvement. I don't feel like their support is perfect. However, I have never met another team that was more dedicated to making sure we get what we want and need.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
In-Person Training
The training was good in general with a nice trainer as well. But, the training could be better if it is more focussed on our process/data etc.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Online Training
There is a learning portal with many videos about navigation, creating reports and managing your model.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
Test test test. Make sure that the product is calculating everyone 100% correctly. DO NOT accept a 70% pass rate as some companies would like to have you believe is acceptable. This means conducting thorough testing by providing 100% of all expected results, but it will be worth it when you know that the compensation plans are working entirely as expected.
Read full review
Go into implementation knowing how you will handle churn, if there are claw backs, treatment for every type of commission payment (i.e. new business, renewals, etc.) and know your average customer life. You'll also want details by customer for as far back as you can go (within reason).
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
In 2015, we used a scorecard containing 80 attributes in our review of Oracle, Callidus, and Xactly & Varicent. Oracle did not have true self serve capabilities- programming was heavily required, not intuitive, out of the box functionality was limited. Callidus & Xactly could not provide us a demo using our data, statements could not be sent out in bulk form, difficulty in importing/exporting to CRM. Varicent excelled in most areas and was the clear winner.
Read full review
CEA was easy to use, easy to implement, and at the right price.
Read full review
Scalability
It is very scalable and adaptable to changing complexities of calculations and business rules under a variety of different scenarios. It does not get full points because in large data loads the time needed to calculate and import the data increases exponentially and may cause issues related to timing potentially.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • Compliance - with a central system used for calculation incentive payments and commissions, we are able to provide reports and data showing every detail of how payments are calculated and why they are justified. We can also identify anomalies and outliers.
  • Integration with our payroll system is seamless. Except for regular pay, nothing goes to payroll without going through ICM. The process for paying incentives/bonuses/commissions is now very structured and efficient.
Read full review
  • Efficiency
  • Centralized
  • Accurate
Read full review
ScreenShots

Varicent Screenshots

Screenshot of Varicent providing clarity and transparency to sellers, helping them to find answers faster and have confidence in compensation plans.Screenshot of Tools for sellers that help them align strategic initiatives, and that help them understand which deals will help them win.Screenshot of Varicent ICM model compensation plans that display the financial impact of changes. Its ability to more accurately forecast commission payouts with “what-if” assumptions, users can budget more effectively for sales compensation costs, manage target total compensation for sales representatives and assess plan effectiveness.Screenshot of Shareable information sent to the right people to drive the right results.

Xactly Commission Expense Accounting Screenshots

Screenshot of Commission Expense Accounting Reports HomeScreenshot of Commission Expense Accounting Portfolio SummaryScreenshot of Commission Expense Accounting Journal EntriesScreenshot of Commission Expense Accounting Amortization Schedule