TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Akamai Cloud Computing

    Score7.9 out of 10
    N/AAkamai Cloud Computing (formerly Linode) include scalable and accessible Linux cloud solutions and services. These products and services support developers and enterprises as they build, deploy, secure, and scale applications.

    $5

    per month

    Vultr

    Score7 out of 10
    N/AVultr is an independent cloud computing platform on a mission to provide businesses and developers around the world with unrivaled ease of use, price-to-performance, and global reach.

    $2.50

    per month

    Pricing
    Akamai Cloud ComputingVultr
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    Block Storage
    $1
    per month
    Cloud Compute
    $2.50
    per month
    Object Storage
    $5
    per month
    Kubernetes Engine
    $10
    per month
    Load Balancers
    $10
    per month
    Managed Databases
    $15
    per month
    Optimized Cloud Compute
    $28
    per month
    Cloud GPU
    $90
    per month
    Bare Metal
    $120
    per month
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Akamai Cloud ComputingVultr
    Free Trial
    YesNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    YesNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup fee
    Additional DetailsCPU, transfer, storage, and RAM are bundled into one price. Storage capacity can be increased with additional Block Storage or S3-compatible Object Storage. Instant Backups can be added with complete independence to the stack. Linode NodeBalancers ensure applications are available.Pricing is based on specifications chosen in each product category. Bandwidth is also included up to a certain amount per month.
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Akamai Cloud ComputingVultr
    Considered Both Products
    Akamai
    Chose Akamai Cloud Computing
    We switched to Linode from Namecheap due to poor uptime, and never had any issues with stability ever again after switching. We also cut our costs in half by switching. We compared Linode to DigitalOcean and Vultr, with the primary factor that caused us to go with Linode …
    Incentivized
    Chose Akamai Cloud Computing
    Compared to the big cloud players like Amazon Web Services, Google Cloud Platform, MS Azure, Oracle Cloud, and co., Linode's product is simpler and cheaper. For quick and straightforward client engagements, the power and flexibility afforded by the previously mentioned vendors …
    Incentivized
    Chose Akamai Cloud Computing
    I've used a few other platforms, DigitalOcean is probably the closest, but Linode always had better backend tools aimed at geeks whereas DigitalOcean just focuses too much on blank whitespace on their control panel, while offering less functionality.

    Incentivized
    Chose Akamai Cloud Computing
    I'd say Linode's main competition is DigitalOcean, I always liked to use Linode instead of DigitalOcean, even though [DigitalOcean's] website looked more professional, and their panel was more robust. Nowadays though Linode has gotten much better but they can do more for sure. …
    Incentivized
    Chose Akamai Cloud Computing
    Linode is faster, with no overselling.
    Incentivized
    Chose Akamai Cloud Computing
    DO doesn't take debit card, only credit card. Not good for many people because taking a credit card in many countries has certain legal requirements that many people don't have. Plus their OS-Image storage costs money. Vultr doesn't offer resizing. Moreover, if you have a …
    Incentivized
    Chose Akamai Cloud Computing
    We tested a few infrastructure providers like DigitalOcean, Vultr and AWS.
    1. Digital Ocean servers is slow compared to Linode.
    2. Vultr high frequency server is fast but we prefer Linode as it is more reliable in terms of uptime.
    Incentivized
    Chose Akamai Cloud Computing
    In terms and conditions, Linode has the most Constitutional terms on speech. The other simply didn't, especially if in Europe. If I wanted to criticize ideas, even if not criticizing people, then non-Constitutional terms of services simply weren't satisfactory. I did use one …
    Incentivized
    Chose Akamai Cloud Computing
    Linode has a very competitive price.
    Incentivized
    Chose Akamai Cloud Computing
    We compared the performance of small instances from Azure and Amazon, and Linode not only has a superior performance (their smallest nodes feel at least twice as fast as the small nodes from Azure or Amazon), Linode's yearly costs are many times cheaper. We tested other …
    Incentivized
    Chose Akamai Cloud Computing
    DigitalOcean had very bad communication both internally and externally. Vultr had good features but could not answer questions about Spectre/Meltdown with any specificity. EC2 and GCE's unpredictable costs and higher bandwidth fees make them annoying or expensive for most of my …
    Incentivized
    Chose Akamai Cloud Computing
    The cost-benefit ratio, along with ease of use and unsurpassed technical support, make Linode our choice.
    Incentivized
    Chose Akamai Cloud Computing
    Linode is easier and more cost-effective than Vultr but lacks an offering around DDOS protection.
    Incentivized
    Chose Akamai Cloud Computing
    Linode ultimately has better value for money. Not as many features/services as AWS but they do cloud computing very well. Managed databases are something we’d like to see and it’s on Linode’s roadmap. AWS nickels and dimes you for everything. We’ve also considered UpCloud, …
    Incentivized
    Chose Akamai Cloud Computing
    There are giants in the cloud industry like AWS and GCP, which most businesses and corporations prefer. They offer a wide range of services. Hence they are preferred. And they offer enterprise support. They offer full control over user management, security and permissions. They …
    Incentivized
    Chose Akamai Cloud Computing
    There are a lot of very good cloud operations. Linode, for us represents a good offering. It offers a simple way to control infrastructure, without being overly simplified. For us, it was a good median giving us the flexibility to explore, experiment and still build for scale. …
    Incentivized
    Chose Akamai Cloud Computing
    They're all the same, to me anyway. The difference is that Linode gives you more bandwidth transfer than the others.
    Incentivized
    Chose Akamai Cloud Computing
    Vultr has probably the best datacenter distribution in America and Europe, and even Oceania is very well covered. Unfortunately it lacks an Indian datacenter, and performance is poor in some locations. it lacks support for some services like Kubernetes and object storage …
    Incentivized
    Vultr
    Chose Vultr
    From the perspective of the above, Vultr provides the best balance of cost vs. performance for us. Cloudways stacks a large fee for each VPS you spin up, and this quickly escalates. Linode comes closest (at least when I used it a few years ago) to Vultr, and 3 years ago this …
    Incentivized
    Chose Vultr
    Linode: Similar pricing, changed our business over to Vultr to save credit card fees by using Crypto.
    Digital Ocean: Fast and reliable, same pricing didn't stay because the payment methods (Similar case to Linode)
    Hetzner: Good pricing, good reputation, limited locations.
    Incentivized
    Chose Vultr
    The Linode data center in Dallas is absolute trash. Nothing but constant issues. I moved a server to Vultr Dallas and it was 1000% better. Digital Ocean is OK, but I'm baked into Vultr for quite some times. Re-architecting would be cost-prohibitive.
    Incentivized
    Chose Vultr
    Linode is a more old-school offering. Linode pricing model and infrastructure rely on classic Virtual Machines. What we like about Vultr is that they offer the same at the front, but in the back, the machines are much more flexible and can be tailor-made to our needs, which of …
    Incentivized
    Chose Vultr
    In its price range I would say Vultr is above the competition, while the "premium" providers are too expensive and don't bring significant improvement.
    Incentivized
    Chose Vultr
    OVH is cheaper overall, but Vultr is more reliable. Especially with support. Even when I have issues that sometimes shouldn't be covered by Vultr they point me in the right direction so I can get things moving. Not that it happens often. I've probably contacted Vultr a total …
    Incentivized
    Chose Vultr
    I just like the Vultr environment. DigitalOcean, for example, has many restrictions about the configuration of 25 ports (email server) and this is really bad for my business. Linode has had security issues in the past, someone has stolen data from one user on their platform. I …
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Features
    Akamai Cloud ComputingVultr
    Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS)
    Comparison of Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS) features of Akamai Cloud Computing and Vultr
    Feature
    Akamai Cloud Computing
    -
    Ratings
    Vultr
    2.8
    15 Ratings
    Service-level Agreement (SLA) uptime00 Ratings2.914 Ratings
    Dynamic scaling00 Ratings2.512 Ratings
    Elastic load balancing00 Ratings2.711 Ratings
    Pre-configured templates00 Ratings2.813 Ratings
    Monitoring tools00 Ratings2.013 Ratings
    Pre-defined machine images00 Ratings2.814 Ratings
    Operating system support00 Ratings3.015 Ratings
    Security controls00 Ratings4.513 Ratings
    Automation00 Ratings2.212 Ratings
    User Ratings
    Akamai Cloud ComputingVultr
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.0
    (216 ratings)
    2.6
    (18 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    9.3
    (29 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Usability
    9.5
    (21 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Availability
    9.1
    (3 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Performance
    8.2
    (3 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Support Rating
    9.2
    (215 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Online Training
    8.2
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    9.1
    (11 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Configurability
    9.1
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    9.1
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    9.1
    (3 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Vendor post-sale
    9.1
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Vendor pre-sale
    9.1
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)