TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Microsoft Teams vs. Webex Meetings

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Microsoft Teams

    Score7.9 out of 10
    N/AMicrosoft Teams combines video conferencing software with team collaboration tools. The communications platform allows MS Office users to conduct conference calls and share files via SharePoint, and join or initiate a group chat.

    $4.80

    per month per user

    Webex Meetings

    Score8.4 out of 10
    N/AWebex Meetings is a video conferencing solution powering hybrid work. It enables a seamless collaboration experience and better results with meetings that are designed to give everyone the ability to engage no matter their location, language, or communication style.

    $14.50

    per month per user

    Pricing
    Microsoft TeamsWebex Meetings
    Editions & Modules
    Microsoft Teams Essentials
    $4.80
    per month per user
    Microsoft Teams Enterprise
    $5.25
    per month (paid yearly) per user
    Microsoft Teams Enterprise
    $5.25
    per month per user
    Microsoft 365 Business Basic
    $7.20
    per month per user
    Microsoft 365 Business Standard
    $15
    per month per user
    Webex Meet
    $14.50
    per month per user
    Webex Suite: Meet + Call
    $25
    per month per user
    Enterprise
    Contact Sales
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Microsoft TeamsWebex Meetings
    Free Trial
    YesYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    YesYes
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoYes
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
    Additional DetailsDiscounts are available for non profit organizations.Discount available for annual pricing.
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Microsoft TeamsWebex Meetings
    Considered Both Products
    Microsoft
    Chose Microsoft Teams
    For me, Teams is also very useful and very user friendly just like the others.
    Incentivized
    Chose Microsoft Teams
    Although competitors such as Slack and Webex can really stand up to MS Teams, our organization chose Teams as the predominant work communicator. Working within this decision, we are overall happy with the feature set that Teams provides. In my opinion, the advantages of its …
    Incentivized
    Chose Microsoft Teams
    Microsoft Teams is faster and very responsive when compared with those tools. Also it is robust and does not crash. It is compatible with most of the OS and platforms. Backward compatibility is amazing. It is an enterprise tool. So can be efficiently used for both client …
    Incentivized
    Chose Microsoft Teams
    It think its great for more informal and ad-hoc communications. It has also helped alot with the Covid-19 working from home situation. When in the office you could walk to your teammate and have a chat instead of a scheduled webex call. Teams messenger has brought this walkup …
    Incentivized
    Chose Microsoft Teams
    When working remotely, it's ideal for team communication. The text messaging and chat features are simple and intuitive. You can quickly and easily join a video or audio conference with other team members. It's just fantastic; it's a must-have tool for business, especially in …
    Incentivized
    Chose Microsoft Teams
    I don’t prefer Microsoft Teams, compared to its competitors. I am sure part of it is simply that I have less experience with it as a platform. Typically during a meeting, people need to multitask at some point, and Microsoft Teams is the least intuitive of how to …
    Incentivized
    Chose Microsoft Teams
    The only reason of use of Microsoft Teams was its price, which was smaller that the price of competitors. But despite the lower price, Microsoft Teams supports fewer functions and provides less quality.
    Incentivized
    Chose Microsoft Teams
    What we have used all these similar product for is collaboration, communication, and file sharing. Instead of using Zoom and Webex, we have consolidated communication on Microsoft Teams. I personally find Microsoft Teams much easier to use and better when it comes to …
    Incentivized
    Chose Microsoft Teams
    It's hard to think of an app that doesn't do a better job at video conferencing than Microsoft Teams. Zoom, Skype, and Webex are the three I'm most familiar with. All three provide far more stabilization, better screen sharing options, better chat functions, and are less …
    Incentivized
    Chose Microsoft Teams
    • Easier video calls with colleagues compared to WebEx
    • Easy to use when combined with other Microsoft products
    • A light platform which loads easily compared to other tools. It thus doesn't use much bandwidth.
    Incentivized
    Chose Microsoft Teams
    As our organization already has Office 365, it is very convenient for the users to use Microsoft Teams with a single username. In addition, it helps to connect the team members any time and from any location. This is really very beneficial for team productivity and gives …
    Incentivized
    Chose Microsoft Teams
    Better Microsoft integration, same quality of video, better chat, better sharepoint, worse screen sharing, worse resource management (battery).
    Incentivized
    Chose Microsoft Teams
    Microsoft Teams is much better than Skype as it does the core collaboration part much better: call quality, screens-hare, group call, etc. Microsoft Teams includes many tools that Skype doesn't have: knowledge base, task tracking, file sharing, etc. Finally, channels takes the …
    Incentivized
    Chose Microsoft Teams
    First of all, Microsoft Teams wasn't my selection. If I had to choose, my organization would be using Webex Teams due to the integration it has with our phone system. Really, I feel the tools are very much the same minus that. The one thing I will say about Microsoft Teams is …
    Incentivized
    Chose Microsoft Teams
    Microsoft Teams was clearly modeled after Slack, which we license as well. I find both of the tools fairly confusing in user interface and navigation. As for meetings and video conferencing, it works about the same as the other offerings we have in-house but still seems to be …
    Incentivized
    Chose Microsoft Teams
    For an app that is integrated with the Microsoft Office 365 suite, it's nice to have. That said, there are many alternatives out there with the same or more robust options if you aren't tied to packaging everything together.
    Incentivized
    Cisco
    Chose Webex Meetings
    Webex is really good with video and audio quality. However, like mentioned before, I haven't seen an option to pin the participant window. Also, there is no focus on content option that is available in Microsoft Teams. Third, the floating video panel blocks the content when …
    Incentivized
    Chose Webex Meetings
    Both are great and we are planning to try Microsoft Teams too!
    Incentivized
    Chose Webex Meetings
    I like them much better. I think Zoom caused us a lot of issues for people with time and people couldn't be their own manager. We just had a lot of problems with Zoom. That's what we primarily used before this. So it has caused us a lot of problems in the past. So WebEx is way …
    Incentivized
    Chose Webex Meetings
    We are using Webex Meetings from last few years. Webex emphasizes data security and offers a stable connection, which is crucial for enterprise communications. Webex offers a suite of tools including screen sharing, virtual backgrounds, breakout rooms, real-time captions, and …
    Incentivized
    Chose Webex Meetings
    Webex Meetings is a complete suite that comes with all the gadgets. The smooth integration in meeting room is essential for the complete experience. The connection with calendar booking, auto meeting start time, and other cool features gives the feeling it actually know what …
    Incentivized
    Chose Webex Meetings
    Webex Meetings has a better interop solution than Zoom or Microsoft. Furthermore, Cisco is the only vendor who has a complete collaboration solution including the platform, endpoints and softclients.
    Incentivized
    Chose Webex Meetings
    Google seems a little bit of an old-fashioned meeting app. It lacks an attractive interface and AI integration.
    Incentivized
    Chose Webex Meetings
    Compared to more well-known video conferencing software like Zoom, Teams, GoTo, and Google Meet, Webex is buggier and less usable.
    Incentivized
    Chose Webex Meetings
    We originally used Skype for Business / Lync and evaluated Webex Meetings and Webex Meetings offered much improved functionality for screen sharing and phone and video conferencing. Eventually we dropped Webex Meetings for Teams because Teams had better integration with M365 …
    Incentivized
    Chose Webex Meetings
    The main benefit was the ability to integrate it into our LMS for enterprise level trainings
    Incentivized
    Chose Webex Meetings
    The ability to transfer multimedia files directly into the platform and a very robust free plan helped me make the decision to try out Webex Meetings. Easy to set up in a company environment and accessible once the learning curve and sign up process are complete. In-platform …
    Incentivized
    Chose Webex Meetings
    Webex Meetings offers robust security features like end-to-end encryption and compliance with industry regulations such as HIPAA, GDPR etc. Webex Meetings also provides advanced integrations with Cisco hardware. Webex Meetings is often preferred for large meetings or …
    Incentivized
    Chose Webex Meetings
    Over the years following the COVID-19 pandemic, we have sustained a constant remote/hybrid presence using the Webex platform. We've learnt new remote ways to comply with safeguarding pupils at home, allowing staff to obtain a more excellent work/life balance and improve our …
    Incentivized
    Chose Webex Meetings
    Easy to use and setup when installed.
    Incentivized
    Chose Webex Meetings
    I think compared to some it's better compared to others, it's worse. It's very in the middle, so it's probably not the best of its class, but also not the worst.
    Incentivized
    Chose Webex Meetings
    Well Webex has better integration with third party tools and can be used from anywhere with least resources. Webex meetings have no known lags or connectivity issues when accessing from web because of its ability to stay connected even in low coverage areas.
    Incentivized
    Chose Webex Meetings
    Overall, Webex Meetings provides excellent control over the virtual meetings.
    Incentivized
    Chose Webex Meetings
    I think they are easily able to be compared to all of the competitors because they are pretty much the same and probably just on the same level as the other ones. I just think it's not as commonly used as the other ones.
    Incentivized
    Chose Webex Meetings
    It is more secure than others I have felt and offer better whiteboard features. Apart from that it is more professional as compare to the other tools we have worked upon. It has many features like recording and better collaboration.
    Incentivized
    Chose Webex Meetings
    Webex Meetings is more robust than its competitors. The number of features that Webex Meetings offers is not matched by the competitors. The application stability during meeting as well as in standby mode is commendable for Webex Meetings. The technical support team from Cisco …
    Incentivized
    Chose Webex Meetings
    Audio and video quality seems lower than Webex Meetings. Also Slido and Vidcast being included with Webex Meetings at no additional cost make Webex Meetings a more cost effective solution.
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Features
    Microsoft TeamsWebex Meetings
    Project Management
    Comparison of Project Management features of Microsoft Teams and Webex Meetings
    Feature
    Microsoft Teams
    7.0
    191 Ratings
    Webex Meetings
    -
    Ratings
    Task Management7.5146 Ratings00 Ratings
    Gantt Charts6.075 Ratings00 Ratings
    Scheduling6.2161 Ratings00 Ratings
    Workflow Automation7.1100 Ratings00 Ratings
    Mobile Access8.1183 Ratings00 Ratings
    Search6.7168 Ratings00 Ratings
    Visual planning tools7.2117 Ratings00 Ratings
    Communication
    Comparison of Communication features of Microsoft Teams and Webex Meetings
    Feature
    Microsoft Teams
    7.8
    200 Ratings
    Webex Meetings
    -
    Ratings
    Chat8.7199 Ratings00 Ratings
    Notifications7.8198 Ratings00 Ratings
    Discussions8.4186 Ratings00 Ratings
    Surveys8.2111 Ratings00 Ratings
    Internal knowledgebase8.1121 Ratings00 Ratings
    Integrates with GoToMeeting6.547 Ratings00 Ratings
    Integrates with Gmail and Google Hangouts5.743 Ratings00 Ratings
    Integrates with Outlook9.1156 Ratings00 Ratings
    File Sharing & Management
    Comparison of File Sharing & Management features of Microsoft Teams and Webex Meetings
    Feature
    Microsoft Teams
    7.6
    185 Ratings
    Webex Meetings
    -
    Ratings
    Versioning8.2129 Ratings00 Ratings
    Video files7.1157 Ratings00 Ratings
    Audio files8.2159 Ratings00 Ratings
    Document collaboration9.2172 Ratings00 Ratings
    Access control8.7155 Ratings00 Ratings
    Advanced security features6.8116 Ratings00 Ratings
    Integrates with Google Drive5.353 Ratings00 Ratings
    Device sync7.6131 Ratings00 Ratings
    Performance & Compatibility of Online Events Software
    Comparison of Performance & Compatibility of Online Events Software features of Microsoft Teams and Webex Meetings
    Feature
    Microsoft Teams
    -
    Ratings
    Webex Meetings
    8.3
    790 Ratings
    High quality audio00 Ratings8.5784 Ratings
    High quality video00 Ratings8.5777 Ratings
    Low bandwidth requirements00 Ratings7.8747 Ratings
    Mobile support00 Ratings8.2712 Ratings
    Screen Sharing
    Comparison of Screen Sharing features of Microsoft Teams and Webex Meetings
    Feature
    Microsoft Teams
    -
    Ratings
    Webex Meetings
    8.3
    779 Ratings
    Desktop sharing00 Ratings8.5777 Ratings
    Whiteboards00 Ratings8.1677 Ratings
    Online Meetings / Events
    Comparison of Online Meetings / Events features of Microsoft Teams and Webex Meetings
    Feature
    Microsoft Teams
    -
    Ratings
    Webex Meetings
    8.1
    788 Ratings
    Calendar integration00 Ratings8.3746 Ratings
    Meeting initiation00 Ratings8.4774 Ratings
    Integrates with social media00 Ratings7.4320 Ratings
    Record meetings / events00 Ratings8.5737 Ratings
    Slideshows00 Ratings8.0668 Ratings
    Online Events Collaboration
    Comparison of Online Events Collaboration features of Microsoft Teams and Webex Meetings
    Feature
    Microsoft Teams
    -
    Ratings
    Webex Meetings
    8.4
    747 Ratings
    Live chat00 Ratings8.6725 Ratings
    Audience polling00 Ratings8.5646 Ratings
    Q&A00 Ratings8.2651 Ratings
    Online Events Security
    Comparison of Online Events Security features of Microsoft Teams and Webex Meetings
    Feature
    Microsoft Teams
    -
    Ratings
    Webex Meetings
    8.5
    739 Ratings
    User authentication00 Ratings8.2691 Ratings
    Participant roles & permissions00 Ratings8.4721 Ratings
    Confidential attendee list00 Ratings8.8431 Ratings
    User Ratings
    Microsoft TeamsWebex Meetings
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.1
    (277 ratings)
    8.4
    (802 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    3.7
    (9 ratings)
    5.9
    (48 ratings)
    Usability
    8.3
    (61 ratings)
    7.8
    (106 ratings)
    Availability
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    9.0
    (447 ratings)
    Performance
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    10.0
    (422 ratings)
    Support Rating
    8.3
    (113 ratings)
    10.0
    (109 ratings)
    In-Person Training
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.2
    (3 ratings)
    Online Training
    -
    (0 ratings)
    5.5
    (3 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    9.8
    (16 ratings)
    Configurability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (8 ratings)
    Contract Terms and Pricing Model
    6.3
    (7 ratings)
    7.3
    (10 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (6 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    10.0
    (418 ratings)
    Professional Services
    7.0
    (7 ratings)
    8.9
    (9 ratings)
    Vendor post-sale
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (8 ratings)
    Vendor pre-sale
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (9 ratings)