| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 SAP Concur | Score8.3 out of 10 | N/A | SAP Concur is a SaaS expense report management product, and handles corporate travel booking, expense report automation, reimbursement, audit, and business intelligence, and corporate card integration. | $9 per month |
 Webexpenses | Score9.2 out of 10 | N/A | Webexpenses is a global provider of spend management solutions, combining integrated Expense Cards with cloud-based software for businesses of all sizes across 70+ countries. Serving industries such as retail, finance, technology, construction, and not-for-profit, Webexpenses gives businesses control over company spending by automating processes, proactively enforcing policies, and controlling costs. Features The Webexpenses… | $54 per month (up to 15 users on the small business plan) |
| SAP Concur | Webexpenses | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
| No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | $250 | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| SAP Concur | Webexpenses | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | Chose SAP Concur SAP Concur has capabilities for all sorts of agencies from SMEs to global enterprise organizations and has robust backend integration tools for SAP and non-SAP services unlike alternatives like Webexpenses and FreshBooks. Invited by TrustRadius (TR) on Vendor's Behalf A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info | Chose Webexpenses this platform was much easier to use. and the ledger was very helpful. Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info Chose Webexpenses Webexpenses is, from what I remember as it was about 6 years ago I used it, very similar to Concur. Find both easy to use. Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info Chose Webexpenses I am unable to provide any detail to this question as I have not used these products, but I am aware of these products and other applications. Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info Chose Webexpenses Concur and Webexpenses are comparable but I feel like Webexpenses is simpler and easier to use. Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose Webexpenses It is much less expensive and the interface is more intuitive. Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose Webexpenses It's on a par with regards to general expenditure but appears to be more functional with regards to personal mileage expenses. Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose Webexpenses Many companies have had their own internal systems created by their own depts, some were very basic. Webexpenses is more efficient and includes a lot more useful features than any system I have used in the past. I would say that Concur is about 'as good' but certainly no better … Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose Webexpenses Cost and practicalities have been considered when evaluating products. the MS Excel workbook has been developed in-house over decades and used various techniques like pivot tables, dropping list, security locks and checkings, compilation of information, formatting before … Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose Webexpenses Concur has a better user experience, the user interface is more intuitive and mobile app is easier to use. Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose Webexpenses Much easier to use than Concur. Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| SAP Concur | Webexpenses | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Management |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Payment Management |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| SAP Concur | Webexpenses | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 8.3 | 9.1 |
| Likelihood to Renew | 9.0 | 9.2 |
| Usability | 8.5 | 9.1 |
| Availability | 9.0 | 9.3 |
| Performance | 9.0 | 9.6 |
| Support Rating | 8.0 | 8.6 |
| In-Person Training | 7.6 | 8.7 |
| Online Training | 9.0 | 9.8 |
| Implementation Rating | 9.0 | 7.8 |
| Configurability | 9.0 | 6.4 |
| Ease of integration | 9.0 | 7.3 |
| Product Scalability | 8.0 | 9.3 |
| Vendor post-sale | 5.0 | 8.7 |
| Vendor pre-sale | 5.0 | 9.1 |
