Webroot Endpoint Protection

Webroot Endpoint Protection

77 Reviews and Ratings

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
Webroot Endpoint Protection	Score8.1 out of 10	N/A	Webroot Endpoint Protection is the OpenText company's business class multi-vector endpoint protection application, providing centralized endpoint management, deep learning intelligence, and advanced behavioral analytics.	$150 per year per 5 seats

Pricing

Webroot Endpoint Protection

Business Endpoint Protection: $150.00
per year per 5 seats
Business Endpoint Protection: $690.00
per year per 25 seats
Business Endpoint Protection: Contact sales team
per 50+ seats

Pricing Offerings
Webroot Endpoint Protection
Free Trial
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No

No setup fee

—

Community Pulse
Key User Insights
	Webroot Endpoint Protection
Considered Both Products	Webroot, an OpenText company Verified User Chose Webroot Endpoint Protection We chose Webroot Endpoint Protection for its lightweight, cloud-based management and minimal impact on system performance. Compared to other solutions we tested and used, Webroot Endpoint Protection offers quick deployment, strong malware protection, and low overhead, making it … Incentivized Helpful? Stephan van der Merwe Head of SecOps in Information Technology at Commsworth Solutions Limited (Computer & Network Security, 51-200 employees) Chose Webroot Endpoint Protection As previously mentioned, it does its job But seriously lacks some of the newer detection engines. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Webroot Endpoint Protection Webroot is good in a way that it is an all encompassing solution one stop shop for protecting endpoints but it needs to be managed and licensed. Some users do not need constant protection or need to have it on their machines in where the combination of Field Effect and Malwareby… Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Webroot Endpoint Protection I use them both. Webroot Endpoint Protection is deployed at the corporate level, but ThreatDown is added at the unit level. If I could only choose 1, Webroot Endpoint Protection would not be it. But, as I said, its price vs. performance ration might be superior to ThreatDown. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Webroot Endpoint Protection Webroot Endpoint Protection is not as feature rich as the other products, but it is a great entry level product. Incentivized Helpful? Brandon Schmidt Infrastructure Engineer in Information Technology at Crown College (Higher Education, 51-200 employees) Chose Webroot Endpoint Protection We found other products to be able to detect malware and malicious URL's better than Webroot Endpoint Protection. Thus, we moved away from Webroot Endpoint Protection. Also, over the years, there were at least 2 big mistakes by Webroot, where our business applications were … Incentivized Helpful? Doug Marchand IT Manager in Information Technology at Saint Andrew's Chapel (Religious Institutions, 11-50 employees) Chose Webroot Endpoint Protection Microsoft Defender is very different from Webroot Endpoint Protection. To explain, Webroot Endpoint Protection must be installed locally for all devices. Microsoft has a local installation for Defender for Windows PCs. What is different is how Microsoft Defender runs on the Mic… Incentivized Helpful? Patrick Doutre Director of Information Technology in Information Technology at Ann Arbor YMCA (Non-profit Organization Management, 501-1000 employees) Chose Webroot Endpoint Protection Less system intensive than Symantec, with a much better management setup on the backend. More robust than Microsoft Defender, though a little heavier on the resources required, but the feature comparison is night and day between the two. Defender does nicely integrate with the … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Webroot Endpoint Protection We would consider Webroot in the top 5 when you factor in ease of use, level of protection, and cost. Probably not as comprehensive as other end-point security solutions but the proper level of functionality and support for our needs. Question what impact the acquisition by … Incentivized Helpful? Mike Smith SR. IT Engineer in Information Technology at BrevAll Technologies, Inc. (Information Technology & Services, 11-50 employees) Chose Webroot Endpoint Protection Webroot Endpoint is just Virus Protect and a good one. Incentivized Helpful? Teri McMullen IT Solution Specialist and Sr. Account Executive in Information Technology at TSpec (Information Technology & Services, 11-50 employees) Chose Webroot Endpoint Protection Both Avast and Norton have caused issues with their impact on system performance. Avast recently caused a major lag on a client-server, and Symantec slows down our systems so much that we ended up recommending more memory than was generally needed. Incentivized Helpful? Eric Milles Help Desk Manager in Information Technology at Kalleo Technologies (Information Technology & Services, 51-200 employees) Chose Webroot Endpoint Protection Webroot Business Endpoint Protection does not hog system resources like Norton and other products do. You don't even know it's running. A look in the task manager will show it's very low on the resource list. Incentivized Helpful? Yvonne Graber President, Owner in Professional Services at Computer Community Hospital (Information Technology & Services, 1-10 employees) Chose Webroot Endpoint Protection Webroot is very lightweight to install and does not slow up your computer. Incentivized Helpful? Michael Cattano Sr. Systems Engineer in Information Technology at Amoeba Networks (Information Technology & Services, 11-50 employees) Chose Webroot Endpoint Protection Webroot Endpoint Protection compares well to the other products listed. Viper, GFI and Symantec are a lot more intrusive and bloated compared to Webroot. The installation is more streamlined as well. The interface is streamlined and not full of fluff as to compared with … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Webroot Endpoint Protection Some of the other options available to us were less expensive than Webroot Endpoint Protection. Still, either required too much management on our end didn't offer multi-platform protection or didn't have all of the features we were looking for. Incentivized Helpful? Adam Friedli Level 2 Network Technician in Information Technology at Springthrough (Information Technology & Services, 11-50 employees) Chose Webroot Endpoint Protection With Webroot, installation is quick and doesn't require a reboot, definitions are always up-to-date without lengthy definition downloads, and the footprint makes it unnoticeable to clients. This can't be said about the other products I have used. Something would inevitably … Incentivized Helpful? Paul Li Senior Associate in Information Technology at Stir Architecture (Architecture & Planning, 11-50 employees) Chose Webroot Endpoint Protection Webroot Endpoint Protection beats the competition in various aspects. Webroot provides an easy web portal management of protected devices. Installation occurs very easily on all devices. Furthermore, the price to protect a workstation vs a server is one and the same. Incentivized Helpful? chuck rogers Owner, CTO & Managing Operator in Information Technology at Genie Computer Services (Computer & Network Security, 1-10 employees) Chose Webroot Endpoint Protection I can tell you that the Webroot Business Endpoint Protection is much better than the competition in three primary areas. Number one; they are the smallest footprint so as not to decrease the performance of the endpoint. Number two; Webroot Business Endpoint Protection is very … Incentivized Helpful? Hunter Bonner Technology Consultant in Information Technology at Absolute Technology Solutions, Inc. (Information Technology & Services, 11-50 employees) Chose Webroot Endpoint Protection Way better, and frankly, no Russian involvement. Incentivized Helpful? James Buchholz Service Manager in Information Technology at ImageNet Consulting (Information Technology and Services, 11-50 employees) Chose Webroot Endpoint Protection Webroot is extremely light on the system resources and incredibly quick to install. From what I've seen it's just as good for malware as Kaspersky and ESET. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Webroot Endpoint Protection Way too heavy of an application. Webroot is a lot lighter and easier to use. Kaspersky overloads the system and pops up at the worst possible time, while Webroot just runs in the background doing its thing. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Webroot Endpoint Protection Webroot has been a much better asset both financially and in overall general use. Compared to Avast and Kaspersky, its been a much better decision that fits into our budget, and compared to Norton, it definitely uses a lot less resources on the endpoint. Norton tended to make … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Webroot Endpoint Protection I think that the AV clients are more light weight than the others which makes running on older slower computers more manageable. Also Cloud manamgenet is a huge, huge plus. Incentivized Helpful? Ron Fenili Systems Administrator II in Corporate at Helac Corporation (Mechanical or Industrial Engineering, 201-500 employees) Chose Webroot Endpoint Protection We looked at Kaspersky, Bitdefender, Norton. Webroot is usually No.1 or 2 based on ratings and user reviews/feedback. Easy to deploy and managability were also key to choosing Webroot. Incentivized Helpful? Jim Bolinski President in Information Technology at Abbas Networking Services, Inc (Health, Wellness and Fitness, 501-1000 employees) Chose Webroot Endpoint Protection Webroot is a player, not as mature as others, however, has a favorable price point Incentivized Helpful?
	Would buy again
	No answers on this topic
	Delivers good value for the price
	No answers on this topic
	Happy with the feature set
	No answers on this topic
	Lived up to sales and marketing promises
	No answers on this topic
	Implementation went as expected
No answers on this topic

Features

Webroot Endpoint Protection

Comparison of Endpoint Security features of Webroot Endpoint Protection
Feature	Webroot Endpoint Protection 7.6 18 Ratings
Anti-Exploit Technology	8.816 Ratings
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)	9.013 Ratings
Centralized Management	7.018 Ratings
Hybrid Deployment Support	7.111 Ratings
Infection Remediation	7.018 Ratings
Vulnerability Management	7.015 Ratings
Malware Detection	7.018 Ratings

User Ratings
	Webroot Endpoint Protection
Likelihood to Recommend	7.5 (23 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew	10.0 (1 ratings)
Usability	9.0 (2 ratings)
Support Rating	9.5 (8 ratings)
Implementation Rating	7.8 (7 ratings)