Microsoft SharePoint is frequently mentioned as an alternative or a tool used alongside Atlassian Confluence, with 26% of reviewers (12 of 47) mentioning it. Reviewers often list it among other collaboration and documentation tools. It appears to be a common point of reference for users familiar with Confluence.

Atlassian Jira is mentioned by 13% of reviewers (6 of 47). It is often cited in the context of project management and integration with other Atlassian products. Some reviewers mention it alongside other tools for collaboration and task tracking.

Miro is mentioned by 9% of reviewers (4 of 47) as an alternative or complementary tool to Confluence. It is often mentioned in the context of visual collaboration and integration with other tools like Jira and Slack. Reviewers seem to use it for diagramming and visual project management.

Trello is mentioned by 9% of reviewers (4 of 47) as another tool they have used or evaluated. It is often mentioned alongside other Atlassian products and project management tools. Reviewers seem to consider it as an option for task management and collaboration.

Google Drive is mentioned by 6% of reviewers (3 of 47). It is cited alongside other document management and collaboration tools like Microsoft SharePoint. Reviewers seem to consider it as part of their overall ecosystem for file storage and sharing.

A significant number of reviewers, 40% (19 of 47), emphasize that Confluence saves time by centralizing documents and streamlining processes. This efficiency stems from reduced time spent searching for information, improved organization, and better management of tasks and projects. Many reviewers indicate that these time savings contribute to overall productivity gains.

Around 28% of reviewers (13 of 47) appreciate Confluence's ability to improve documentation and knowledge management. Reviewers find it easier to create and organize documentation, leading to a more comprehensive knowledge base that benefits various teams. This centralized knowledge base reduces reliance on individuals and improves access to information across the organization.

Approximately 21% of reviewers (10 of 47) highlight Confluence's positive impact on collaboration and teamwork. Reviewers report that Confluence facilitates better coordination, communication, and information sharing among teams. This improved collaboration leads to more efficient workflows and a standardized approach to processes.

About 13% of reviewers (6 of 47) indicate that Confluence leads to increased productivity. This boost in productivity is attributed to streamlined workflows, better collaboration, and easier access to information. Reviewers note that the integration between Confluence and Jira further enhances productivity by facilitating seamless navigation between tasks and requirements.

Around 11% of reviewers (5 of 47) express concerns regarding search and usability, stating that it can be difficult to find information. Some reviewers mention that the search functionality is not always effective, leading to wasted time. However, others praise the AI features that help in finding relevant documents.

Atlassian Jira is the most frequently mentioned software alongside Confluence, with 40% (19 of 47) of reviewers noting its use. This high co-mention rate suggests a tight integration or complementary use-case between the two Atlassian products. Reviewers often list Jira alongside other productivity and collaboration tools, indicating its role within a broader workflow.

Miro is mentioned by 19% (9 of 47) of reviewers as a tool they regularly use alongside Confluence. This suggests that Miro's visual collaboration capabilities are often used in conjunction with Confluence's documentation and knowledge management features. Reviewers list Miro alongside various other tools, highlighting its integration within diverse workflows.

Slack is mentioned by 15% (7 of 47) of reviewers, indicating its role as a communication and collaboration hub alongside Confluence. Reviewers often list Slack alongside other tools such as Google Drive and Jira, suggesting its integration within a broader ecosystem. The co-mention of Slack highlights the importance of real-time communication in workflows that also involve documentation and knowledge sharing.

Microsoft Teams is mentioned by 8% (4 of 47) of reviewers as a tool used alongside Confluence. This suggests that Microsoft Teams serves as another communication and collaboration platform integrated with Confluence. Mentions of Microsoft Teams alongside other Microsoft products indicate its role within the Microsoft ecosystem.

A substantial number of reviewers, 43% (20 of 47), utilize Atlassian Confluence as a central knowledge base and documentation repository. They appreciate its ability to organize important company knowledge, document software development efforts, and serve as a repository for various types of information, ranging from requirements and test cases to meeting notes and processes.

About 34% (16 of 47) of reviewers highlight Atlassian Confluence as a versatile documentation platform. Reviewers find it useful for documenting processes, software solutions, and various types of information, such as HR processes and product information, creating a centralized hub for organizational knowledge.

Approximately 26% (12 of 47) of reviewers emphasize Atlassian Confluence's role in knowledge sharing and management. They value its ability to facilitate internal knowledge transfer, break down information silos, and provide a centralized platform for teams to share knowledge, ideas, and solutions, making information easily accessible.

Around 23% (11 of 47) of reviewers utilize Atlassian Confluence for project management and collaboration. They appreciate its ability to organize operations, facilitate project planning, and maintain a historical record of decisions, changes, and processes, enhancing transparency and communication within teams.

About 15% (7 of 47) of reviewers highlight Confluence's collaboration features. They value its ability to enable team members to co-author documents, comment on pages, and work more efficiently, fostering transparency and collaboration across teams and departments.

A substantial number of reviewers, 30% (14 of 47), express dissatisfaction with Confluence's search functionality. Reviewers find the search results often lack relevance, and the algorithm struggles with older or less frequently accessed documents. Some users note that common words are ignored, and the search is too heavily based on the recency of updates rather than relevance.

Formatting and layout limitations are noted by 13% (6 of 47) of reviewers. These reviewers desire more customization options for fonts, line spacing, and overall page layout. Some find the current UI design simplistic and suggest more visually interesting choices.

Approximately 11% (5 of 47) of reviewers mention UI/UX issues. These include concerns about the intuitiveness of the interface, occasional bugs, and complex navigation.

Permissions and access control are areas of concern for 9% (4 of 47) of reviewers. They suggest improvements are needed in the clarity and ease of finding space permissions.

A substantial portion of reviewers, 28% (13 of 47), positively highlight Confluence's integration with Jira. They appreciate how it facilitates tracking development, bugs, and other work by linking them directly to detailed Confluence documentation. This integration is seen as particularly valuable for development and technical project management teams.

Confluence is frequently praised for its documentation and knowledge management capabilities, with 23% (11 of 47) of reviewers mentioning this aspect. Reviewers find it to be a useful central system for storing and maintaining documents in a shared, secure space. They also appreciate its ability to structure documentation in an easy-to-digest manner.

Around 10% (5 of 47) of reviewers highlight Confluence's document creation and management capabilities. They find it easy to create and manage project-related documents, meeting notes, and workflows. The ability to write documentation in plain text and create project-based hierarchical documentation is also valued.

Approximately 10% (5 of 47) of reviewers find Confluence to be easy to use. Reviewers appreciate the intuitive interface for structuring pages and creating documents. Some find it superior to traditional tools like Microsoft Word or Google Docs.