#1 most frequent
United States of America
46.7%2,248 installations of 4,815
What is BrowserStack?
BrowserStack is a test platform built for developers and QAs to expand test coverage, scale and optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability. BrowserStack states it currently powers over a billion tests a year for customers who include Amazon, Paypal, Well Fargo Bank, Nvidia, MongoDB, Pfizer, GE, Discovery, React JS, Apache, JQuery and several others rely on BrowserStack to test their web and mobile apps.
Categories & Use Cases
Media
1 / 6
Who Buys & Uses BrowserStack
#2 most frequent
India
9.6%461 installations of 4,815
#3 most frequent
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
8.6%415 installations of 4,815
Pros
- Strong automation testing capabilities with frameworks like Cypress and Selenium
- Reliable cross-browser testing
- Facilitates testing on multiple web and mobile devices
LIGHTNING FAST TESTING.
Use Cases and Deployment Scope
We use BrowserStack to test all operating systems and browser combinations that our platforms support. BrowserStack helps us to identify bugs in our software reported by our customer base without having to purchase all operating systems that they use.
Pros
- Provides almost every combination of real world user experience.
- Ability to determine bug reports and reproduce problems in a timely manner.
- I wouldn't be able to perform my integration testing as a QA professional without BrowserStack.
Cons
- The ability to test emails via specific operating systems; we had a bug happening via Outlook on a specific operating system only. I reached out to support and this is not something currently possible in BrowserStack.
Most Important Features
- Updated Browsers.
- All new operating systems.
- Mobile devices for testing.
Return on Investment
- We would be lost without BrowserStack.
- The ROI of using BrowserStack is that we don't have to purchase every operating system or mobile device to perform our testing.
Other Software Used
Litmus from Validity
AI Driven Quality Engineering All it does BrowserStack
Use Cases and Deployment Scope
I am using BrowserStack for cross browser testing, Mobile testing, Visual testing and Accessibility testing. Exploring LowCode recently. The major business problem that gets addressed is Real time testing in real devices rather than simulators or emulators. Also when it comes to compliance, BrowserStack's Accessibility helps way better than other tools in the market in making WCAG 2.XX compliances and testing ease and effortless and automating it too.
Pros
- Cross browser testing with its Device farm
- Accessibility testing
- Percy - Visual testing tool
- Test management
Cons
- I see they have Low code and AI driven automation. But still there is more room for improvement in this area to make it easier for automation testers.
- If they have some integration to convert existing Selenium tests into LowCode tests, would be great for QE's
Most Important Features
- Accessibility
- Mobile device farm
- Percy
- LowCode
- Observability
Return on Investment
- We had 20% ROI recently which is very positive through Accessibility.
- In terms of Automated regression tests, Considerable improvement in running tests parallely in a device farm and multiple browser versions and types, which helps faster releases and less cycles.
Other Software Used
Perfecto by Perforce, Tricentis Tosca, Testsigma
Usability
BrowserStack - the one for all platform
Use Cases and Deployment Scope
We were using BrowserStack mainly for testing the website that we built. Mainly for the purpose of responsiveness testing. BrowserStack made the process of testing the website very simple and easy. We can also take screenshots of bugs that we encountered and it made testing quick and easy for our team. We tested it on multiple browsers as well as tested the site on mobile devices and it was so easy.
Pros
- Testing of websites and capturing bugs screenshots
- Testing responsiveness of websites on multiple screen sizes
- Multiple mobile devices available for testing
- Easy one for all testing platform
- Easy to use
Cons
- Loading some of the mobile devices is a bit slow
- Mobile device response is a bit slower as compare to the desktop devices
- It's good and easy to understand, so currently I don't think of any other missing functionalities
Most Important Features
- Testing of websites on multiple desktop and mobile devices
- Local testing for websites on multiple devices
- One platform for testing
Return on Investment
- BrowserStack definitely made positive impact because of its simplistic testing methods
- The ui is easy to understand
- Selection of devices directly and starting the testing journey
Alternatives Considered
LambdaTest
Other Software Used
BrowserStack, LambdaTest
BrowserStack is still King
Use Cases and Deployment Scope
We primarily use BrowserStack for live, cross-browser testing. We are rebuilding over 15 websites and need to verify the site looks and works consistent in 22+ different browsers. We plan on taking advantage of the automated testing next, to be sure that, for example, forms work consistently and that their workflows are indeed firing properly.
Pros
- cross-browser testing
- automated testing
- no-code automated testing
Cons
- more optimized UI
- better organization of tool
- instead of more tools - synthesize and combine functionality for a streamlined UX
Most Important Features
- screenshot test
- live cross-browser testing
- website scanner
Return on Investment
- improved responsive design
- streamlined testing
- allows us to find bugs quicker
Alternatives Considered
SmartBear TestLeft and LambdaTest
Other Software Used
ClickUp, Semrush, Google Gemini
East West Bank
Use Cases and Deployment Scope
Our organization use BrowerStack to stimulate our digital banking. We use this to demonstrate to our customers how that works without using any genuine data of any customers. We find it particularly useful for those elderly who are not familiar with digital devices. The software helps us a lot in promoting our products.
Pros
- Showing how to use digital banking step by step
- Don't have to worry about using real data
Cons
- More user friendly to open accounts
- Much easier to start up the application process
- Provide demonstrations to first time user
Most Important Features
- Ensure data privacy
- Platform stimulation
- Demonstrating instructions step by step
Return on Investment
- Positive ROI
