A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info
Verified User
Engineer in Engineering (10,001+ employees)
Use Cases and Deployment Scope
At some locations we use Meraki full stack, so we have a variety of switch for core and access layers. But at almost every other location we use them only to split the WAN service between 2 routers. For this we use a basic 8 port switch, which is all we need for this purpose.
Pros
Remote tools
Visibility of each port usage
Configuration using templates
Cons
Improve logging
Implement AI to spot issues
Return on Investment
Reduction in people onboarding time.
Graphical interface without need of third party tools
You need a lot of money to implement this solution, capex and opex.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info
Verified User
Administrator in Engineering (51-200 employees)
Use Cases and Deployment Scope
Meraki switches are easy to deploy in a network and can be managed from anywhere once it is online on cloud. We generally use Meraki switches as core switch to segregate traffic as per our requirement by implementing static route and also restricting traffic through ACL. Meraki PoE switches are easy for using with Access points as power requirement for those APs are easily fulfilled through it.
Pros
Simplicity in SVI creation
OSPF configuration on the MS is very easy to configure
ACL configuration is something which anyone can understand and do
Policies implementation on the ports are very easy on MS
Cons
Policy based Routing is something which is very important features required.
Upgradation of dual persona switch 9300 takes a lot of time and we need to upgrade it a day before the implementation.
Proper CLI configuration should also be there on Meraki Switch
Return on Investment
Meraki ease of deployment is best suited
Ease of management
Simple dashboard configuration is best for any users
Features like PBR and CLI management will improve the sale further
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info
Verified User
Employee in Information Technology (501-1000 employees)
Use Cases and Deployment Scope
The Cisco Meraki MS platform is easy to configure, manage, and utilize. The GUI has a great desktop experience for all users.
Pros
Set up
Ease of use
Search ability
Diagnostics
Cons
We have had some issues with ports becoming faulty over time
Return on Investment
Reliability
Warrany
Service
Alternatives Considered
Cisco Meraki Dashboard, Cisco Secure Connect and Cisco Duo
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Chief Information Security Officer in Information Technology at Threatvector (11-50 employees)
Use Cases and Deployment Scope
Company has several access points distributed in different contact center and business customer agents, and to be able to manage all from a single console and give internet to the clients and offices. Have complete control and administration of the contact centers, permitting easy control. Allowing and easy way to add new devices or replace all ones
Pros
Single user friendly console
Easy manage of all devices
Adding new features in new versions
Scalability
Cons
The license cost is one of the pain points
Capability to integrate with other vendors
More templates to generate reports
Return on Investment
Improved visibility of the network of the remote offices
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Telecomunications in Information Technology at Grupo K (1001-5000 employees)
Use Cases and Deployment Scope
We use Cisco Meraki MS switches for the network access layer. We also have it integrated with other Meraki products (Security Appliance, Access Point). The advantage that Cisco Meraki MS gives us is the ease of adding them to the network quickly and easily, the high performance they have and the visualization through the dashboard.
Pros
Easy configuration
Packet capture
Troubleshooting tools
Cons
Does not have CLI
More information about cdp neighbors
STP configuration could be more accessible
Return on Investment
Less time in troubleshooting
More stability in connections, better performance
Fast implementation, no much time needed
Alternatives Considered
Cisco 1000 Series Integrated Services Routers (ISR 1000), Cisco 4000 Series Integrated Services Routers (ISR 4000) and Cisco Catalyst Switches
Other Software Used
Microsoft 365, Microsoft Azure, Cisco Umbrella, ManageEngine Endpoint Central
Usability
Cisco Meraki MS Alternatives
Products similar to Cisco Meraki MS that may also meet your needs.