Cisco Storage Area Networking great low-latency for your data lake systems.
Rating: 10 out of 10
IncentivizedUse Cases and Deployment Scope
We use Cisco Storage Area Networking in our organization to provide connectivity between our All Flash storage box and our SQL Servers. These servers require a low latency network to access their data located in our NVMe storage box. We have found that their capabilities are quite robust and the management effort in order to keep them updated are quite small. They haven't given us any issues or significant incidents with the technology, this gives complete peace of mind.
Pros
- Provide low latency SAN access
- Easy to configure configuration language
- Great support from vendor
- No loss of service when doing maintenance activities
Cons
- User interface for certain configurations: some are hard to use or not intuitive
- Enhanced analytics and reporting tools could provide deeper insights
- Having more automation capabilities for routine tasks like firmware updates and host group management
Likelihood to Recommend
The best scenario where we found the Cisco Storage Area Networking is best suited is for an architecture where we need a robust technology that provides high level SLAs regarding downtime due to maintenance activities. Our infrastructure provides the core to our Data analytics team, which provides the data needed for our commercial and management leaders to make the right decisions thanks to the data. We need our infrastructure to be robust and reliable, when it runs smoothly, we can focus on other aspects of IT Infrastructure areas, giving our inside business clients the service they need.
