TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

CoffeeCup HTML Editor Reviews & Insights

Score10 out of 10

7 Reviews and Ratings

Community insights

TrustRadius Insights for CoffeeCup HTML Editor are summaries of user sentiment data from TrustRadius reviews and, when necessary, third party data sources.

Recommendations

Users have made several recommendations for CoffeeCup HTML Editor based on their experiences. The most common recommendations include considering CoffeeCup HTML Editor as a cost-effective alternative to Adobe Dreamweaver, especially for those who are working with front-end design extensively. Users highly recommend CoffeeCup HTML Editor for beginners who are trying to learn HTML programming language, as they find it easy to work with and ideal for those with a base knowledge of web design and a stricter budget. Many users find CoffeeCup HTML Editor to be a simple and efficient code editor, especially for making fast edits or working with clients who are not FTP savvy. They appreciate the fast loading time, straightforward interface, and the wide range of components available for quick web page creation. Overall, these recommendations highlight that CoffeeCup HTML Editor is a cost-effective option for beginners learning HTML as well as experienced web designers looking for a straightforward and efficient editing tool.

CoffeeCup HTML Editor Reviews

1 Review

Easy to use HTML editor with plenty of features

Rating: 10 out of 10
Incentivized

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

Prior to using CoffeeCup as my primary HTML Editor, I used one that came with Cold Fusion (when CF was still an Allaire application), HomeSite. When that editor was discontinued, I search for, and found, CoffeeCup. I have been using it for over six years. I use an editor primarily to modify existing HTML or CFM pages. I rarely use it to create one from scratch, and typically use less than half of its baked-in features.

Pros

  • Easy to use editing features
  • Helpful analysis of code, and useful suggestions for corrections
  • Very useful split-screen preview of HTML code
  • Wizards to guide inserting tables, links, images, audio etc.

Cons

  • Maybe I could list a con if my use of it was more diverse and consistent. It does everything and more for my purposes, and in ways I Iike very much.

Likelihood to Recommend

My typical use is to edit HTML and CFM pages from prior projects, and use them to create new ones. So, I rarely use the tools for designing pages provided in this application. I have found the ability to preview a page very useful. I am aware of numerous features in this editor, that simpler editors would not provide. It has proven to be a great fit for my use.