Insights from Grammarly Reviewers
Based on 11 verified reviews published in the last 18 months
What positive or negative impact (i.e. Return on Investment or ROI) has Grammarly had on your overall business objectives?
11 answeredThis report analyzes 11 recent reviews to assess Grammarly's impact on business objectives. Reviewers most frequently cited improvements in communication (6 of 11 reviews) and time/money savings (3 of 11 reviews). The perceived value stems from enhanced clarity and professionalism in written communication, leading to more effective interactions with colleagues, stakeholders, and clients. Reviewers also highlighted the efficiency gains from reduced editing and proofreading, allowing them to focus on other tasks. While the sample size is small, the available data suggests a positive return on investment for users who prioritize clear and efficient written communication.
Improved Communication
6 mentionsA majority of reviewers (6 of 11) noted that Grammarly improved their communication abilities, leading to more professi…
A majority of reviewers (6 of 11) noted that Grammarly improved their communication abilities, leading to more professional and effective interactions. This includes clearer communication with executive leadership, stakeholders, teammates, and even donors. Reviewers also felt that their communication appeared more polished and professional with the assistance of Grammarly.
Saves Time and Money
3 mentionsAbout a quarter of reviewers (3 of 11) indicated that Grammarly saves them time and money by streamlining their writing…
About a quarter of reviewers (3 of 11) indicated that Grammarly saves them time and money by streamlining their writing process. This is achieved through reduced editing and proofreading needs, allowing users to allocate their time to other important tasks. The time savings translate to monetary benefits, as less time spent on editing equates to increased productivity and efficiency.
Besides Grammarly, what other software do you regularly use? How likely would you be to recommend it to a friend or colleague?
11 answeredThis report synthesizes 11 recent product reviews to identify software commonly used alongside Grammarly. Reviewers mentioned a variety of other tools, with WordPress and Anthropic Claude each being mentioned by 2 of the 11 reviewers. These tools span different functionalities, from website management to AI assistance, indicating a diverse range of complementary software used by Grammarly users.
WordPress Use
2 mentionsWordPress was mentioned by 2 of the 11 reviewers as another regularly used software. This suggests that some Grammarly…
WordPress was mentioned by 2 of the 11 reviewers as another regularly used software. This suggests that some Grammarly users are also involved in content creation and website management, where WordPress is a popular platform.
Anthropic Claude Use
2 mentionsTwo of the 11 reviewers mentioned using Anthropic Claude alongside Grammarly. These reviewers did not elaborate on the…
Two of the 11 reviewers mentioned using Anthropic Claude alongside Grammarly. These reviewers did not elaborate on the specific reasons for using Anthropic Claude, but its mention suggests a potential interest in AI-assisted writing and content generation among Grammarly users.
Please provide some detailed examples of areas where Grammarly has room for improvement.
11 answeredThis report synthesizes 11 recent reviews to identify areas where Grammarly users see room for improvement. Several reviewers expressed concerns regarding the user interface and experience (UI/UX), with 5 out of 11 reviewers mentioning issues such as disruptive widget placement and difficulty of use compared to other AI writing tools. Another significant area of concern was the accuracy of Grammarly's suggestions, cited by 4 reviewers, who found the AI's recommendations to be inappropriate, unhelpful, or contradictory at times. Additionally, 3 reviewers felt that the AI itself could be improved, noting instances where Grammarly changed the intent of their sentences or made irrelevant feature suggestions. These issues collectively suggest that while Grammarly offers value, users experience notable frustrations with its usability and the quality of its AI-driven assistance.
UI and UX issues
5 mentionsFive of the 11 reviewers cited issues with Grammarly's user interface and user experience. These reviewers found the in…
Five of the 11 reviewers cited issues with Grammarly's user interface and user experience. These reviewers found the interface annoying, with the overlay tool being disruptive and obscuring text. Some also found other AI writing tools easier to use.
Inaccurate suggestions
4 mentionsFour of the 11 reviewers mentioned that Grammarly sometimes provides inaccurate or unhelpful suggestions. Some reviewer…
Four of the 11 reviewers mentioned that Grammarly sometimes provides inaccurate or unhelpful suggestions. Some reviewers found the tool to be overly aggressive in highlighting perceived errors, while others felt the AI misunderstood their intended meaning or offered contradictory advice.
AI and suggestions
3 mentionsThree of the 11 reviewers suggested improvements to Grammarly's AI. They noted that the AI could change the intent of t…
Three of the 11 reviewers suggested improvements to Grammarly's AI. They noted that the AI could change the intent of the sentence. One reviewer expressed frustration with being shown suggestions for features they did not have access to.