TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Grammarly Reviews & Insights

Score9.2 out of 10

334 Reviews and Ratings

Top industries

Based on 1,524 HG Insights installations.

Powered by

Community Insights for Grammarly

Synthesised from 11 verified reviews.


Synthesised from 11 reviews | Last Published April 23, 2026


This product assessment is based on a synthesis of 11 recent reviews covering user satisfaction, ROI, and complementary software. Grammarly is a widely-used AI writing assistance tool designed to improve written communication. Reviewers indicate that Grammarly enhances communication (6 out of 11 reviews) by improving clarity and professionalism, which leads to more effective interactions. Users also noted time and money savings (3 out of 11 reviews) due to reduced editing and proofreading efforts. However, a significant portion of users report frustrations. Specifically, 5 out of 11 reviewers cited issues with the user interface, finding it disruptive or difficult to use compared to other AI writing tools. Additionally, 4 reviewers raised concerns about the accuracy of Grammarly's suggestions, citing instances of inappropriate or contradictory recommendations. While Grammarly offers a positive return on investment for many users, potential buyers should carefully consider the reported usability issues and accuracy concerns.


  • Improves clarity and professionalism in written communication
  • Saves time and money by reducing editing and proofreading
  • Enhances communication effectiveness with colleagues and clients
  • User interface can be disruptive or difficult to use
  • AI suggestions can be inaccurate, inappropriate, or contradictory
  • AI sometimes changes the intended meaning of sentences
What positive or negative impact (i.e. Return on Investment or ROI) has Grammarly had on your overall business objectives?

From 11 reviews | Last Published April 23, 2026

This report analyzes 11 recent reviews to assess Grammarly's impact on business objectives. Reviewers most frequently cited improvements in communication (6 of 11 reviews) and time/money savings (3 of 11 reviews). The perceived value stems from enhanced clarity and professionalism in written communication, leading to more effective interactions with colleagues, stakeholders, and clients. Reviewers also highlighted the efficiency gains from reduced editing and proofreading, allowing them to focus on other tasks. While the sample size is small, the available data suggests a positive return on investment for users who prioritize clear and efficient written communication.

Saves Time and Money

Streamlined my efforts and has saved me so much time

Improved Communication

Improved my communication to executive level leadership and stakeholders

Besides Grammarly, what other software do you regularly use? How likely would you be to recommend it to a friend or colleague?

From 11 reviews | Last Published April 23, 2026

This report synthesizes 11 recent product reviews to identify software commonly used alongside Grammarly. Reviewers mentioned a variety of other tools, with WordPress and Anthropic Claude each being mentioned by 2 of the 11 reviewers. These tools span different functionalities, from website management to AI assistance, indicating a diverse range of complementary software used by Grammarly users.

WordPress Use

Constant Contact, WordPress, Anthropic Claude

Anthropic Claude Use

ChatGPT, Anthropic Claude

Please provide some detailed examples of areas where Grammarly has room for improvement.

From 11 reviews | Last Published April 23, 2026

This report synthesizes 11 recent reviews to identify areas where Grammarly users see room for improvement. Several reviewers expressed concerns regarding the user interface and experience (UI/UX), with 5 out of 11 reviewers mentioning issues such as disruptive widget placement and difficulty of use compared to other AI writing tools. Another significant area of concern was the accuracy of Grammarly's suggestions, cited by 4 reviewers, who found the AI's recommendations to be inappropriate, unhelpful, or contradictory at times. Additionally, 3 reviewers felt that the AI itself could be improved, noting instances where Grammarly changed the intent of their sentences or made irrelevant feature suggestions. These issues collectively suggest that while Grammarly offers value, users experience notable frustrations with its usability and the quality of its AI-driven assistance.

AI and suggestions

AI could be better

Inaccurate suggestions

Very relentless in highlighting wrong grammar,the red highlights gets annoying on screen while typing.

UI and UX issues

UI is very annoying, the hovering cloud of shut down button can be avoided.

Loading Reviews List....