A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Associate Product Manager in Product Management at ZS Associates (10,001+ employees employees)
Use Cases and Deployment Scope
We use MockFlow for creating low-fidelity wireframes and prototyping to validate our business process flows and hypotheses. It is also used a create mock UI visualizations for referencing & contextualization.
Pros
Ease of use. The UX is great.
A decent number of pre-built UI elements such as browser frames, dropdowns, buttons, etc.
Good prototyping ability. We can create decent prototypes using links.
Collaborating capability for multiple members in a team.
Ease of exporting the wires in different formats.
Cons
Grouping the similar elements together to further enhance the UX.
Detailing the wires is still clumsy.
Monochromatic UI can be improved a bit.
Icon availability is limited.
More collaboration features.
Grouping of elements in the wires is cumbersome.
Most Important Features
Multi-page wireframing
Prototyping ability
Exporting of wires in desired format.
Return on Investment
Low turnaround time for creating wireframes resulting in aligning the team on a single path.
Validating UX & UI hypothesis quickly leading to less rework & quicker results
Saving to & fro time with parallel collaboration feature.
Alternatives Considered
Balsamiq and Figma
Other Software Used
Atlassian Confluence, Balsamiq, Zoho Calendar, Zoho Projects
Usability
MockFlow Alternatives
Products similar to MockFlow that may also meet your needs.