Old but Stable Monitoring Solution
Use Cases and Deployment Scope
We are using [Micro Focus Network Node Manager i (formerly HP Network Node Manager)] [over the] last 6 years when it was HP's product and the primary purpose of Network Node Manager was to monitor our customer's network infrastructure fault and performance monitoring and reporting. It was being used by network practice and support department and monitoring team as well.
Pros
- Fault and Performance Monitoring
- Performance Reporting
- Alerting and Flexible threhsolds
- Product stability
Cons
- Micro Focus still using older technology
- Unavailability of APIs for 3rd party interaction
- no out of the box integrations with 3rd party systems
Likelihood to Recommend
[Micro Focus Network Node Manager i (formerly HP Network Node Manager)] is like you implement it, setup monitoring and alerting and forget it forever until any major activity is there and that is possible because of the product's stability. Another reason for product stability is less features as compared to other vendor tools and its own inbuilt database.
