TrustRadius Insights for ProsperOps are summaries of user sentiment data from TrustRadius reviews and, when necessary, third party data sources.
Business Problems Solved
Users of ProsperOps have found the platform to be incredibly valuable for optimizing their AWS Cloud spend. By automating the process of reservation and savings plan laddering, organizations have been able to achieve optimal effective savings rates while simultaneously reducing risk. Customers have reported significant cost reductions for AWS EC2 instances, even when utilizing more AWS resources for development. The product's success lies in its ability to automate AWS reservations, providing improved flexibility, coverage, and utilization, which leads to substantial discounts on EC2 spend.
Additionally, ProsperOps has proven effective in managing AWS platform costs and providing visibility for users, with discussions underway to include support for Microsoft Azure as well. Users have experienced lower AWS costs through the utilization of Reserved Instances and Savings Plans, resulting in lower overall expenses and higher profit margins for their businesses. With ProsperOps handling the management of AWS savings instruments on their behalf, customers have achieved high utilization rates across a large percentage of compute on-demand spend.
Engineers appreciate that ProsperOps solves the challenge of managing AWS EC2 reserved instances, saving them hours of manual management each month. The service autonomously identifies cost optimization opportunities within the AWS ecosystem and implements programmatic changes to generate substantial savings. Moreover, users value that ProsperOps requires minimal access privileges, ensuring peace of mind and dependability for customers. The platform's passive monitoring approach and simple IAM role for cost analysis ensure that application performance is unaffected, while posing no security risks. Overall, ProsperOps has become an essential tool for users looking to optimize their AWS infrastructure spend, saving both time and money in the process.
ProsperOps simply requires the least privileged level of access, which provides us peace of mind and dependability. Passive monitoring of our computing resources does not necessitate the use of any agents, and the cost analysis is handled by a simple IAM role. Because of this, we don't have to worry about ProsperOps' access privileges impacting our application's performance or posing a security risk.
Pros
The arbitrage strategy is effective. It's hard to believe how good the service is.
It is a plug-and-forget approach for ProsperOps.
It costs ProsperOps a percentage of the savings they make.
Cons
The inclusion of RDS and Elasticache in cost management is something I'd be all for.
When it comes to EC2 capacity reservations, ProsperOps only includes reserved instances in the region where we are located.
Likelihood to Recommend
Our firm spends the majority of its cloud budget on EC2 instances, Fargate deployments, and Lambda executions. Automated modifications to discount portfolios based on changes in workloads allow ProsperOops to handle our shifting workloads with ease. In order to meet our net cloud budget requirements, it always follows a high-quality SP (Savings Plan) Portfolio management strategy.
VU
Verified User
Administrator in Information Technology (10,001+ employees)