Simple to understand interface makes this a great tool for entry level through experienced testers!
Use Cases and Deployment Scope
I am the lead web accessibility specialist for the state. This tool was the first automated plugin I ever used during accessibility testing. I use this to spot-check specific web pages as well as automated testing for smaller-scale sites. I also strongly encourage any of our testers to use this as the automated testing component of their testing process.
Pros
- Creates a great visual display of where the error is located, both in HTML source and page view.
- An excellent option in the contrast checker is to select the color slider to locate a color that will pass accessible.
- Clearly displays the alt text of images to check that it makes sense and is accurate
- Great at indicating if an error is visually hidden but in the code.
- Clean, organized, easy-to-understand details report
Cons
- Have it check for ARIA errors
- Indicate whether errors are A, AA, etc.
- Have the ability to set the accessibility standard level
- Quick export of report
Most Important Features
- Simple, easy to understand interface so staff pick up on it quickly.
- Quickly figure out correct color to use for contrast issues via the color slider
- The carefully planned interface makes it great to do screenshots to share with someone to let them know where the error is
- It's great at explaining what the error is and what it means.
Return on Investment
- It is an excellent testing tool for our web applications.
- The fact it is free gives the freedom for anyone to use it at any time without needing to budget a tool.
- It is a longstanding, trustworthy product.
Alternatives Considered
Siteimprove
Other Software Used
Siteimprove, Basecamp, Webex App