4me.com vs. Microsoft System Center Service Manager

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
4me.com
Score 10.0 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
Next-Generation Enterprise Service Management Built for the world’s most demanding enterprises. 4me® combines ITSM with ESM and SIAM capabilities making it possible for all internal departments, such as IT, HR and Facilities, to work seamlessly with each other, as well as with external managed service providers. The vendor describes…
$0
per user per month
Microsoft System Center Service Manager
Score 8.6 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft System Center Service Manager is an integrated platform that is designed for automating and adapting IT Service Management best practices to an organization’s requirements. The platform includes built-in processes for incident and problem resolution, change control and asset lifecycle management.N/A
Pricing
4me.comMicrosoft System Center Service Manager
Editions & Modules
4me.com Freemium
$0
per user per month
4me Premium
on Request
per month per user
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
4me.comMicrosoft System Center Service Manager
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
4me.comMicrosoft System Center Service Manager
Considered Both Products
4me.com

No answer on this topic

Microsoft System Center Service Manager
Chose Microsoft System Center Service Manager
It has its similarities between the two from a ticketing standpoint but as a primarily Microsoft shop it is nice to have a product that was created to play along with other tools that we are using such as SCCM. We like Jira for the project management tools and Cherwell for …
Chose Microsoft System Center Service Manager
I can't really compare them as we haven't used an "all in one" tool like SCCM. There are other patch management software, other remote control applications, and to be honest, I find those work better when compared to SCCM. However, there hasn't been an application yet that does …
Chose Microsoft System Center Service Manager
We selected MCSM because it is a solid product that we could use very quickly, compared to other tools there is a lot more effort for integration into the infrastructure, costing time and money. We implemented the tool very quickly and since it integrates with other Microsoft …
Chose Microsoft System Center Service Manager
Not easy to customize, like ServiceNow, but default configuration works much more stably than SNow implementations I saw. Cannot be implemented as a service and requires underlying infrastructure. Jira is much more lightweight, but very limited in functionality. At the same …
Chose Microsoft System Center Service Manager
We use this program on the thin client side of things. We don't utilize it as much as SCCM so I am not sure how it compares to tell you the truth. We are about to explore this option to see if this is a better way to manage the thin clients, which it is pointing in that …
Chose Microsoft System Center Service Manager
IT auditing , asset tracking and timeline tracking have been the driving factors for our IT staff using Microsoft System Center Service Manager. The ROI from the time management of our IT staff has been the driving factor and its built for IT professionals to use. So …
Features
4me.comMicrosoft System Center Service Manager
Incident and problem management
Comparison of Incident and problem management features of Product A and Product B
4me.com
8.7
Ratings
7% above category average
Microsoft System Center Service Manager
7.8
Ratings
4% below category average
Organize and prioritize service tickets10.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Expert directory9.00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Service restoration6.00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Self-service tools10.00 Ratings8.70 Ratings
Subscription-based notifications9.00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
ITSM collaboration and documentation10.00 Ratings9.70 Ratings
ITSM reports and dashboards7.00 Ratings7.10 Ratings
ITSM asset management
Comparison of ITSM asset management features of Product A and Product B
4me.com
8.3
Ratings
1% above category average
Microsoft System Center Service Manager
8.2
Ratings
0% below category average
Configuration mangement8.00 Ratings9.80 Ratings
Asset management dashboard10.00 Ratings8.70 Ratings
Policy and contract enforcement7.00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Change management
Comparison of Change management features of Product A and Product B
4me.com
10.0
Ratings
18% above category average
Microsoft System Center Service Manager
6.7
Ratings
22% below category average
Change requests repository10.00 Ratings6.10 Ratings
Change calendar10.00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Service-level management10.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
4me.comMicrosoft System Center Service Manager
Small Businesses
Agiloft Service Desk (discontinued)
Agiloft Service Desk (discontinued)
Score 9.0 out of 10
Agiloft Service Desk (discontinued)
Agiloft Service Desk (discontinued)
Score 9.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Agiloft Service Desk (discontinued)
Agiloft Service Desk (discontinued)
Score 9.0 out of 10
Agiloft Service Desk (discontinued)
Agiloft Service Desk (discontinued)
Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises
ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus
ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus
Score 9.2 out of 10
ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus
ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus
Score 9.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
4me.comMicrosoft System Center Service Manager
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(0 ratings)
8.8
(0 ratings)
Usability
10.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.9
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
4me.comMicrosoft System Center Service Manager
Likelihood to Recommend
Great visibility of asset assignment to user but not so good if you track also assignment of user rights through CI for users. It would be nice if you can group types of assets/configuration items to user not to show everything mixed up. There is great options to adopt product to your particular needs, there are options for adding some special fields in process automation to help to have tailored process from enduser fill in forms to complex workflow which utilises various specialists
Read full review
I think any organization that runs windows on their computers that is size over 50 workstations and looking for a complete package to manage their windows machines must have Microsoft System Center Service Manager, especially if they have Windows servers and VMs. The capability of managing multiple devices at ones can save a lot of time for the IT jobs.
Read full review
Pros
  • IT processes automation
  • Responsive GUI
  • Weekly updates which pinpoint some difficulties in daily usage
Read full review
  • Imaging - Can hold all of your images and allow them to be deployed from one central place
  • Patching - Able to manage patches from a central database and have reporting on machines out of compliance
  • Reporting - ability to utilize several reports to check compliance and other items you may want to review
Read full review
Cons
  • It is easy to do first deployment in wrong direction - maybe there should be better guidance how to setup services/service instances to properly work at the end.
  • Reporting is based on predefined templates - to get most of them you have to properly implement services in IT - it is not an easy process
  • Integration with O365 for out of office would be helpfull
Read full review
  • Reporting in System Center could be more user-friendly. While the data is there, sometimes several reports have to be run to get what you want
  • SCCM would be better making updates to SCCM easier. We see risk in updates, so it causes delays, which creates more risk
  • Improving the application deployment log files , making them easier to read
Read full review
Usability
Tool has built-in automation module which helps to more precisely define user requests or workflow condition. This from one hand gives end-user easy and understandable forms to fill in, and from other had it ensure all needed information has been fulfilled for further steps in workflow. Once you follow service principle which is base for that tool it will help you to track in detail your business and your partners
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
The customer support service is excellent. They help from start/deployment through to any time later on. They responded quickly and resolved our issues professionally and in no time.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
No answers on this topic
It has its similarities between the two from a ticketing standpoint but as a primarily Microsoft shop it is nice to have a product that was created to play along with other tools that we are using such as SCCM. We like Jira for the project management tools and Cherwell for their customization but the latter took lots of effort to get that piece working.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • As we are finance institution we are strictly regulated so this product helps us in many fields to satisfy regulatory requests through easy workflow management setup.
  • Product is easy to implement, easy to adopt so we use it in different segments of business (central purchase department, security office, IT department) for tracking and standardising various processes in each niche.
Read full review
  • "Quick" patch management -- once the process is nailed down.
  • The ability to include remote control in a central place.
  • Reporting is great.
Read full review
ScreenShots

4me.com Screenshots

Screenshot of Portfolio ManagementScreenshot of Change Calendar showing possible conflicts of changesScreenshot of Customer SLA Reports: after defining a SLA the report is automatically thereScreenshot of Waterline Portfolio Management analysisScreenshot of Agile Project ManagementScreenshot of Enterprise Resource planning with 4me