| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 Acumatica | Score8.6 out of 10 | N/A | Acumatica delivers a set of cloud-based business software applications with dashboards, reporting tools, integrated document management, centralized security, and customization tools. | $1,000 per year |
 Microsoft Dynamics GP | Score6.8 out of 10 | N/A | Microsoft Dynamics GP is an ERP software with accounting capabilities. It includes various packs for customizability and features tailored to specific industries’ needs. GP is offered as a perpetual license or subscription. | N/A |
| Acumatica | Microsoft Dynamics GP | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | Pricing is always consumption-based with no five-year lock-ins or termination penalties. The Acumatica ERP pricing structure allows adding casual users, suppliers, and customers without paying for additional licenses. The cost is based on the features and resources utilized, not on the number of users who access the system. An Acumatica partner works with users to understand specific requirements, determine the proper resources and modules for the company, and presents a price for the license. | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Acumatica | Microsoft Dynamics GP | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | Chose Acumatica Better support, more scalability, and more customizations with Acumatica Invited by TrustRadius (TR) on Vendor's Behalf A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info Chose Acumatica Modern ERP, Cloud based. Browser independent. Invited by TrustRadius (TR) on Vendor's Behalf A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info Chose Acumatica They were unable to provide a cost-effective SAAS option, and there was very little advancement of the software functionality over many years of use. Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info Chose Acumatica Well, we decided to go with Acumatica and I believe it was a really good decision. The VAR was a big part of that as well because of their insights and knowledge, but I just felt Acumatica was the right fit for us in size and it had the capabilities we needed, but it also … Invited by TrustRadius (TR) on Vendor's Behalf A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose Acumatica Cloud Based, built from the ground up for the needs of customers. Always enhancing the product. Invited by TrustRadius (TR) on Vendor's Behalf A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose Acumatica Dynamics was a local application requiring maintenence updates and on site resources. We have enjoyed the move to a cloud base system. Invited by TrustRadius (TR) on Vendor's Behalf A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose Acumatica Current ERP was past use of life Invited by TrustRadius (TR) on Vendor's Behalf A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Acumatica | Microsoft Dynamics GP | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payroll Management |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Customization |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Security |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Reporting & Analytics |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| General Ledger and Configurable Accounting |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Inventory Management |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Order Management |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Subledger and Financial Process |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Project Financial Management |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Project Execution Management |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Grants Management |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Procurement |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Risk Management |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Logistics |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Manufacturing |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Supply Chain |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Product Lifecycle Management |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Acumatica | Microsoft Dynamics GP | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 8.6 | 7.0 |
| Likelihood to Renew | 9.4 | 9.9 |
| Usability | 7.9 | 8.0 |
| Availability | 8.5 | 10.0 |
| Performance | 7.4 | 7.0 |
| Support Rating | 7.2 | 7.0 |
| In-Person Training | 7.1 | - |
| Online Training | 8.4 | - |
| Implementation Rating | 6.8 | 8.2 |
| Configurability | 8.0 | - |
| Contract Terms and Pricing Model | 6.5 | - |
| CPA Rating | - | 9.0 |
| Ease of integration | 5.5 | - |
| Product Scalability | 7.3 | 9.1 |
| Professional Services | 9.1 | - |
| Vendor post-sale | 5.0 | - |
| Vendor pre-sale | 7.5 | - |
