Adobe Campaign vs. Net-Results

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Adobe Campaign
Score 6.9 out of 10
N/A
Adobe acquired Neolane in July 2013 and later re-named the product Adobe Campaign. Adobe Campaign provides both marketing automation and marketing resource management functionality such as spend & financial management, workflow, and asset management.N/A
Net-Results
Score 8.1 out of 10
Small Businesses (1-50 employees)
Net-Results is a marketing automation solution that features segment-driven approaches to lead management and marketing automation. Some key features include support for A/B email testing, drag & drop landing pages, CRM integrations, and automated marketing workflows.
$800
Annual agreement, up to 25,000 Contacts or 60,000 Sends
Pricing
Adobe CampaignNet-Results
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
One Price Full Platform
$800
Annual agreement, up to 25,000 Contacts or 60,000 Sends
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Adobe CampaignNet-Results
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsTiered pricing by total email sends or total contacts, you decide. All features included. No upsells or limitations based on your price.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Adobe CampaignNet-Results
Considered Both Products
Adobe Campaign
Chose Adobe Campaign
more legacy, less intuitive but more customizable
Chose Adobe Campaign
We adore the fact that we can run numerous automated campaigns concurrently and that we can make changes to them without stopping and starting a new campaign. Adobe Campaign makes it possible for the process to go on.
Chose Adobe Campaign
Haven't used Salesforce Marketing Cloud much.
Chose Adobe Campaign
Sender also offers multi-channel marketing capabilities, allowing users to engage with their audience through different channels. However, the range and depth of multi-channel capabilities in Adobe Campaign are generally more extensive. So after using both the platforms I …
Chose Adobe Campaign
One of the major resons was already having AEM and creating a highly cohesive tech stack. Adobe Campaign fit the criteria.
Chose Adobe Campaign
In the end we didn’t go with Adobe Campaign.
Although it offers great a great tool set that is very flexible. You do need someone on staff that know Adobe products to get the full utilisation out of it. Ultimately what it came down to for us was that because we had a small team, …
Chose Adobe Campaign
Adobe Campaign Standard has a lot of segmentation options out of the box and a lot better analytics. Pardot is a lot more listbased, where with Adobe Campaign, you can do complete customized segmentation, such as all permissions in base A who are currently customers of this …
Chose Adobe Campaign
Easy drag and drop user friendly maenu and optimise software a good alternative to google as campaign.
Chose Adobe Campaign
Especially in its ease of use, especially considering its price and the great possibilities that this tool has given our company. Definitely a great competitor in this sector and the best option in terms of campaign creation, without any doubt, even having things that could be …
Chose Adobe Campaign
Adobe Campaign is more advanced when it is used with other tools from Adobe family.
Chose Adobe Campaign
Adobe Campaign has all the features and tools that develop the whole marketing and sales channels. It has been able to integrate with our systems in all departments in development of our planning structure. While Salesforce CMS works effectively in the management of our …
Chose Adobe Campaign
Compared to other websites, Adobe Campaign stacks up with its various uses. You can create with its other platforms and follow through. Other platforms, you have to use adobe to create then go somewhere else to schedule and post. Adobe Campaign allows you to use all within one …
Chose Adobe Campaign
Adobe Campaign is good in terms of features, offerings, it's customization options, and extensive possibilities to make a powerful email campaign or offer landing page. It's very reliable and stable too. But in terms of its dashboard UI, it is not as simple or quick to learn as …
Chose Adobe Campaign
All these applications are very similar, adobe has a differential for the company's expertise, for the way cloud services and their specialists are treated. I believe that it also has a differential in the metrics and management of flows where it is possible to have a broader …
Chose Adobe Campaign
The platform is much more complex and much more suited for complicated applications. While Mailchimp is an easier all rounded solution for starters it doesn’t allow the system integrator to do customization of the workflows and more complicated tasks. I would say that in my …
Chose Adobe Campaign
Adobe Campaign is different from these products in that is much more all-encompassing and is able to manage more aspects of a campaign than these more singular-tracked platforms.
Chose Adobe Campaign
As we tried to centralise the marketing automation platform within the enterprise, Adobe Campaign can plug into several instances of Salesforce.com for lead management queues. All other marketing automation platforms can only plug into one instance of Salesforce.com.

Adobe …
Chose Adobe Campaign
For B2C campaign, [I] still prefer to go with Marketo. However, for all other transactional/Nontransactional, promotional, Welcome email campaigns, while it is required to handle [the] global market with [a] number of brands, [I would] [prefer to] go with Adobe Campaign …
Chose Adobe Campaign
  • Easy to install
  • Free trails
  • Lesser cost as compared to others
Chose Adobe Campaign
Pardot: Adobe is a better value for the money. Active Campaign: Adobe Campaign has more automation features but comes inexpensive.
Chose Adobe Campaign
Adobe Campaign has a lot more features as compared to Mailchimp. While Mailchimp allows you to send a lot of communication to a lot of recipients, Adobe Campaign lets you set variables in the workflow, and send email at different times with a lot more customization. Adobe …
Chose Adobe Campaign
Adobe is far ahead of what I used previously. Adobe has all the details of the customer which is required to increase the sales of the company and the customer also gets relevant information.
Mailchimp is just an email tool where we can send mails to multiple users.
Net-Results
Chose Net-Results
We've used ClickDimensions and Marketo. We felt that ClickDimensions was more limited as far as creating effective email campaigns and not as easy to use. It also is completely native to Dynamics CRM, which can be a positive and a negative. Marketo was the previous solution …
Chose Net-Results
Net-Results is easier to use and we have been able to format emails that are more functional and look better.
Chose Net-Results
Constant Contact was great for what it was. We were wanting to see who was visiting our website and be able to get more leads that way. When we found out that Net-Results offered email marketing as well it made sense to use that. Creating, building and sending the emails to our …
Chose Net-Results
Act-On and HubSpot - We believe Net-Results was a better overall value for similar features.
Chose Net-Results
We also looked into Act-On, but Net-Results just had that something.
Chose Net-Results
Just a better team and stronger overall value.
Chose Net-Results
Net-Results is much better than a lot of marketing platforms on the market.
Chose Net-Results
Marketing automation at its core has become very standardized. While most platforms can easily compete with one another it is difficult to ignore the small company factor when it comes to top-notch support. Net-Results cares a great deal about your success and do what they can …
Chose Net-Results
Act-On and Marketo because of Sugar integration. We found Net-Results offering best value.
Chose Net-Results
Net-Results is 10X more powerful than HubSpot, which to us was a basic marketing automation implementation that focused only on top of funnel acquisition.

Net-Results is structured for the marketing automation power user whereas Pardot is structured for the generic marketing …
Chose Net-Results
Net-Results is much easier to use, I'd say some other softwares can be guesswork. All the features of the big marketing automation softwares are included in Net-Results. And don't even try to compare prices!
Chose Net-Results
We selected Net-Results because they aren't too big to not care about their customers. They work with our company on an individual basis, integrating our systems so that, working together, we are more efficient and effective. The mammoth companies wouldn't care whether we …
Chose Net-Results
--Priced much much better than the big dogs in the industry, and similar to platforms with much fewer features
--Support is excellent and includes phone support, which the others didn't
--Doesn't need to take over your blog and host it on their site, like others do.
Chose Net-Results
Net-results is more cost effective and you feel like you really get to know the team. This is not a big organization feel, but they have a lot of power.
Chose Net-Results
Net-Results was far more customizable and able to integrate with our website than any other solution. It is more intuitive than Strongmail and more powerful than Constant Contact. Blue Hornet didn't offer this level of integration.
Chose Net-Results
Initially, we made inquiries with other providers. It seemed they were either too large, or too small. Net-Results provided a team responsive to our specific needs, without having to tolerate a voicemail hockey game with each inquiry. I am able to contact the appropriate …
Features
Adobe CampaignNet-Results
Email & Online Marketing
Comparison of Email & Online Marketing features of Product A and Product B
Adobe Campaign
-
Ratings
Net-Results
7.1
Ratings
7% below category average
WYSIWYG email editor00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Dynamic content00 Ratings7.20 Ratings
Ability to test dynamic content00 Ratings7.30 Ratings
Landing pages00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
A/B testing00 Ratings6.30 Ratings
Mobile optimization00 Ratings5.00 Ratings
Email deliverability reporting00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
List management00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Triggered drip sequences00 Ratings8.60 Ratings
Lead Management
Comparison of Lead Management features of Product A and Product B
Adobe Campaign
-
Ratings
Net-Results
7.6
Ratings
3% below category average
Lead nurturing automation00 Ratings8.50 Ratings
Lead scoring and grading00 Ratings8.40 Ratings
Data quality management00 Ratings5.00 Ratings
Automated sales alerts and tasks00 Ratings8.60 Ratings
Campaign Management
Comparison of Campaign Management features of Product A and Product B
Adobe Campaign
-
Ratings
Net-Results
7.5
Ratings
1% above category average
Calendaring00 Ratings7.90 Ratings
Event/webinar marketing00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Social Media Marketing
Comparison of Social Media Marketing features of Product A and Product B
Adobe Campaign
-
Ratings
Net-Results
6.9
Ratings
9% below category average
Social sharing and campaigns00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Social profile integration00 Ratings6.70 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Adobe Campaign
-
Ratings
Net-Results
6.3
Ratings
15% below category average
Dashboards00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Standard reports00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Custom reports00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Platform & Infrastructure
Comparison of Platform & Infrastructure features of Product A and Product B
Adobe Campaign
-
Ratings
Net-Results
7.5
Ratings
0% above category average
API00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Role-based workflow & approvals00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Customizability00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Integration with Salesforce.com00 Ratings7.90 Ratings
Integration with Microsoft Dynamics CRM00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Integration with SugarCRM00 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Adobe CampaignNet-Results
Small Businesses
Mautic
Mautic
Score 9.0 out of 10
Vbout
Vbout
Score 9.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
The Trade Desk
The Trade Desk
Score 9.0 out of 10
PFL Direct Mail Platform
PFL Direct Mail Platform
Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Iterable
Iterable
Score 8.8 out of 10
PFL Direct Mail Platform
PFL Direct Mail Platform
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Adobe CampaignNet-Results
Likelihood to Recommend
5.0
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.4
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
5.0
(0 ratings)
7.5
(0 ratings)
Availability
7.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
7.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
5.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
In-Person Training
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Online Training
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Adobe CampaignNet-Results
Likelihood to Recommend
Multi-Channel Campaign Management: I have found Adobe Campaign to be excellent for managing campaigns across multiple channels, including email, mobile, social media, and web. Its centralized platform allows me to plan, execute, and track campaigns effectively, making it ideal for organizations with diverse marketing channels. For example, when I was running a campaign to promote a new product launch across email, SMS, and social media channels, Adobe Campaign provided me with the tools to orchestrate and track the campaign seamlessly. I could ensure consistent messaging and a cohesive customer experience across different channels.
Read full review
It's great for a small to medium-sized marketing team. We manage it with just a two person marketing staff. It also works well with the Professional version of Salesforce. It works well for moderately skilled marketers, meaning ones that might not have previous marketing automation experience or lots of digital experience. The other options are much more complex. Hope that helps!
Read full review
Pros
  • What we like most about this application is that it provides us with the creation of ads to generate presence and impact on different channels at minimum cost.
  • It has a section where [it] [helps] us determine our preferences in terms of marketing by private messaging and offer a report of actions.
  • It also provides analysis with percentages to determine how many customers actually received our e-mail advertising.
Read full review
  • Visibility - Net-Results provides an excellent view into the current state of our prospects. We can understand how prospects are engaging with our assets, create detailed segments, and track prospects through the different stages of our nurturing campaigns.
  • Responsive email design - Net-Results has an excellent drag and drop email builder that uses responsive email designs. It is the easiest email builder I've ever used and the emails look great on both desktop and phones.
  • Support - Obviously support is not a product feature, but it is one of the most important aspects to consider when choosing solutions. Net-Results in the front of the pack when it comes to support. Their support team is intelligent, responsive, and is able to provide a resolution often in only one or two emails.
  • Campaign flexibility - There is a great deal of flexibility when it comes to structuring campaigns. Between segmentation and logical branching Net-Results is able to execute campaigns just as you envision them. They've done a nice job making the campaign complexity scalable, allowing simple campaigns to be created with ease.
Read full review
Cons
  • It requires administrator rights in order to deploy into an environment.
  • We do not want changes directly in a production environment so deployments are a bottleneck since only a few have access.
  • Performing user audits are difficult or even impossible in certain cases to determine who started/executed/made changes to a workflow.
  • There's no easy way to roll back changes.
Read full review
  • Adding new contacts to our contact list. I would love integrations with Outlook. I am communicating with new people every day and it would be awesome to be able to tag a new contact and automatically add that person to an appropriate contact segment without logging in and manually adding a new contact (which I rarely do)
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Despite the shortcomings of user interface and basic troubleshooting difficulty, Neolane is much more robust and delivers better capabilities to our sales and marketing staffs than any other product we have used here or any product our staff members have used at other locations.
Read full review
Net-Results does what we need and is straightforward to use. Their team has been very responsive to our requests and great to work with.
Read full review
Usability
Thanks to this tool we are taking more internal control of the creation and deployment of campaigns with less dependency on an ESP. We can pre-program marketing publications, being able to concentrate on the target audience. It helps me manage email campaigns with real-time tracking.
Read full review
Net Results is pretty easy to use and understand. I wouldn't say that it is the best in comparison to MailChimp's drag and drop email builder, but Net Results do so much more than MailChimp that it is hard to even compare the two. Overall Net Results has good usability
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Aside from frequent error prompts, the program is quite dependable
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Although there is a lot of material available on the internet to answer questions, I still feel a lack of commitment and delay in the responses of the support, but as a whole, it leaves nothing to be desired. I believe that, in the great majority, companies sin in the desired support, but we cannot generalize. But this one, in particular, has a wide range of specialists and well-qualified management, but I believe that it is not so bad.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Sender also offers multi-channel marketing capabilities, allowing users to engage with their audience through different channels. However, the range and depth of multi-channel capabilities in Adobe Campaign are generally more extensive. So after using both the platforms I selected Adobe Campaign for my email marketing purpose.
Read full review
Net-Results is 10X more powerful than HubSpot, which to us was a basic marketing automation implementation that focused only on top of funnel acquisition. Net-Results is structured for the marketing automation power user whereas Pardot is structured for the generic marketing professional. Net-Results lacks in the enterprise level functionalities that Pardot has. But Net-Results excels in the flexibility and customizability of campaigns where Pardot is more limited in terms of how you can send and what you can send based on variables
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Adobe Campaign has boosted our ROI, with a 700% increase in the last month of using the service. These results are very favorable, and we will continue to use the service.
  • Adobe Campaign makes it easy to calculate the proposed ROI on a monthly basis, as it constantly lets us evaluate and compare the growth of our earnings in relation to previous ones.
Read full review
  • Our email open and click rates have increased as a result of our better ability to target the right audience.
  • Our ability to track engagement has enabled us to improve content.
  • We have seen an increase in the number of registrants per auction as a result of better marketing.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Net-Results Screenshots

Screenshot of Advanced nurturing campaignsScreenshot of Form actionsScreenshot of Salesforce integration/FunnelvisionScreenshot of Deep database segmentationScreenshot of Dashboards and reportsScreenshot of Drag and drop email builder