Adobe's Firefly models and services power generative AI features in Adobe creative apps, with features that can be used in Photoshop, Premiere Pro (beta), and the Firefly web app.
N/A
ChatGPT
Score 9.2 out of 10
N/A
OpenAI offers ChatGPT, an advanced general intelligence (AGI) chatbot which interacts in a conversational way. The dialogue format makes it possible for ChatGPT to answer followup questions, admit its mistakes, challenge incorrect premises, and reject inappropriate requests. ChatGPT is a sibling model to InstructGPT, which is trained to follow an instruction in a prompt and provide a detailed response.
$0
per month
Pricing
Adobe Firefly
ChatGPT
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Free
$0
per month
Plus
$20
per month
Team
$30
per month per user
Pro
$200
per month
Enterprise
Contact Sales
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Adobe Firefly
ChatGPT
Free Trial
Yes
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Adobe Firefly
ChatGPT
Considered Both Products
Adobe Firefly
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose Adobe Firefly
Adobe Firefly has more advanced generative AI capabilities if you are looking to create something specific
Photoshop provides a far more extensive and complete set of features, largely due to it being a far older product that has been through decades more development time with feed back from creatives and artists to build on. Adobe Firefly is still extremely new and dare I say, in …
I think compared to its competitors it is a lot more high-quality because it integrates to all of the Adobe suite applications directly in which is something that I utilize quite a lot. For the other external applications they don't integrate like that. But I think it is still …
I don't know of other generative AI models integrated within other services. However, I have other generative AI references that, although they did not appear in the list generated by you, here I include one about some that I have used. DALLE-E MidJurney AWS Generative AI …
Midjourney was not in this list but that is the most similar to Firefly in my opinion. I find that Adobe Firefly and Midjourney have a lot of overlap. The generative fill options on Photoshop and Illustrator also include very similar use cases with generating photography and …
Honestly it's more to do with specific purpose and my love for the brand. I use a wide range of Adobe products and always have done. Plus comparing ChatGPT against Firefly is a tough ask as ChatGPT is more focused on text based solutions.
I’ve tried other design tools like Canva and Midjourney, which are both great in their own ways. Canva is excellent for quick, easy-to-use templates and basic design needs, and it’s very beginner-friendly. Midjourney, on the other hand, has impressive AI capabilities for …
I found that when using ChatGPT for generating images, the whole end result looked amateurish. Image quality was loose and not at all photo realistic. Although neither engine can generate text on an image to a useable standard, Firefly has far superior image rendering and the …
Photoshop at the end of the day can do a lot more than Adobe firefly, and probably most of the other software on the market for media generation. However, Adobe Photoshop requires extensive training for results and quite a bit more of training for excellent results. That would …
While ChatGPT is sort of the leader, in my opinion, Firefly is more accessible and seems a little for user friendly. Particularly if you are at all familiar with any other Adobe design products. I have only used a trial version of Kittl so I am not all that familiar with …
I cannot get the product list to Midjourney/Discord, but that is the AI we started on before dabbling in Firefly. TBH, Firefly is sorely lacking in the creativity department compared to MJ. Results are often childish and a bit off until you really get the hang of the prompts …
Firefly is really the only one that is embedded into a complementary product, so it has a huge edge right there. However, it doesn't seem to be on par yet with Midjourney or Dall-E when it comes to results of your prompts, but it's better than the other ones I listed.
Adobe Firefly biggest difference from Adobe Illustrator's generative image tools is not being vector-based like Illustrator. Firefly is a little more pared down in it's interface and a little easier to pick up use, but is also therefore more limited in user settings. Overall, …
This works a lot better than Canva's image generator, and seems to return much more relevant images, even when using the exact same prompt. Canva's function also doesn't have all the specific filters, styles etc, to help you narrow down the exact style of image you need. Canva …
Adobe Firefly provides images of much higher quality than the Copilot image generator and without credit limitations, allowing for more continuous experimentation. Although I haven’t used Shutterstock’s AI yet, I no longer see the need to rely on image banks for most of our …
Adobe Firefly couples well with the other Adobe Apps we use for our organisation, so the overall subscription includes other products we can leverage. We find that FireFly produces the same, if not better results that it's AI competitors such as ChatGPT and Google Gemini.
Adobe Firefly is as easy, if not easier to use versus its competitors in the creative space. However, because it is so easy, it lacks the ability to tweak its settings to the degree a creative would expect. The biggest benefits is its integration into Adobe Photoshop and it's …
I like Adobe Firefly because if you are already familiar with the platform, it's easier to integrate into photoshop and the creative cloud suite. There are also more options that something like Dalle with Chat GPT. If it is something you do for a living, I'd recommend this over …
I think Adobe Firefly has a little more cutting edge image creation technology behind it, and in comparison was able to generate better looking images on our test prompts faster than it did in DALL-E with Copilot. Copilot still worked pretty well, but Firefly has a lot of tools …
Most tailored for multi-functional use across departments, a business version where data resides in your own workspace and is not used for training. Safest feel overall.
ChatGPT is often seen as the default and the leader and first and most widely adopted generative AI engine. However, I tend to find that Google Gemini can more accurately cite sources and offers more disclaimers. ChatGPT is prone to answering everything, at the risk of …
I tried and bought multiple tools like Perplexity, Jasper, and Copy.ai, but no one is comparable with ChatGPT. Most of the tools are built for a specific niche, but ChatGPT is built for everything.
they all work very similar, and since answers are probabilistic, sometimes you get better answers from other similar apps. ChatGPT was a pioneer and its several iterations have made many improvements in usability. It's as a wide set of knowledge and you can pretty much ask it …
For breaking news and very up to date data, Grok and Perplexity are better. They have access to very recent or proprietary data that's relevant to any topic you want to research. Gemini is great for large prompt context needs. I would use Claude for more coding related stuff. …
ChatGPT is simply the most complete, well-rounded AI tool in existence right now. It can do everything the others can, often better, and often in a way that's more intuitive and easier to iterate. It takes prompts far better than most, and incorporates direction better than …
In my experience ChatGPT does great job than any other LLM model at this moment. However, in terms of web search, perplexity scores high compared to ChatGPT because ChatGPT misses critical news while doing web crawling
We've used other programs, including ones integrated into current products that we use, and we've found that ChatGPT delivers better in the sense of content learning and creation. Other programs do offer some research ability, but we're found ChatGPT is more diverse and …
ChatGPT is an excellent writing, ideating, and editing assistant with an American attitude. This LLM learns from human input and can give very sound results in unexpected situations. 'Memory' feature is especially useful, because it saves a lot of time and effort, so the LLM …
Where ChatGPT is better: ChatGPT has significantly more use cases - it's much more versatile. Some aspects of ChatGPT's user experience are better than Claude's. I prefer ChatGPT's results presentation compared to Claude's. Where Claude excels: Claude is a more skilled …
In my experience, Claude won't say things it feels is offensive or callous (for instance I asked for themed slogans for a bachelor party where I was the best man), and only provided G and PG related content. ChatGPT was quick to get naughty with puns and slogans, especially …
I find the images generator much better in getting what you asked for using ChatGPT. When using FireFly or Midjourney I tend to take the prompt that was generated in ChatGPT in order for me to get something more visually stunning. So the visuals could be much better, room for …
We also use Adobe Firefly as an AI assistant. Maybe this should be expected, as Adobe are experts in visual design software, but Adobe Firefly handles AI image generation a lot better than ChatGPT seems to. ChatGPT's images appear to be very loose and untidy, but in comparison, …
I find most of the pop AI's annoying. When I did a comparison between Chat, and Bard for example, Bard seems more clinical. It's difficult to shut it down thereafter. (I believe I successfully disable it) META is like that too. If you're on Facebook and want to look up …
Adobe Firefly is great for quickly generating multiple design options, which is ideal for fast-paced projects like social media content and ad visuals. It’s especially useful when we need to create visually consistent assets across various platforms without a lot of manual work. However, the tool has room for improvement. Customization options can feel limited, making it challenging to achieve highly specific looks. The consistency of design style across different projects can sometimes vary, and the collaboration tools, while helpful, could be more user-friendly for large teams.
I’d definitely recommend ChatGPT to anyone as a great introduction to generative AI and as a starting point in research, writing, brainstorming, or general questions or judgement questions. It can be a great tool to use when you don’t necessarily need an accurate answer. For example, I wouldn’t let it calculate my taxes, but I’d use it to ask some general tax questions, then ask for sources and then verify by checking those sources. I also love ChatGPT for writing and questions - it’s great for emails, creating templates and outlines, and for generating spreadsheet formulas.
Saves time by generating content about a specific topic very quickly
Allows us to quickly learn information online (from various sources or even a single lengthy article) into more summed up digestible paragraphs (and even bullet points)
Can autogenerate content on a vast amount of topics
Has mild compatibility issues depending on what software or needs you have pre existing.
While it does have deep customization, the areas it can apply to are bit narrow. It’s good quality, but we still find a few missing features and often supplement with human interaction.
Has a bit of a problem with file size uploads, which is tough in media related tasks.
Wish it had support for better slides generation. Sometimes we found ourselves using chatgpt to outline a presentation but build it ourselves or use a tool like Gamma
Maybe a chepear $10 plan. In some countries the US dollar can be expensive and $20 goes a long way.
I wish you could make projects with more files. They limit it. Or make the limit based on the content, not the number of files per se
Because while Adobe Firefly is a good tool (and comes integrated to a certain extent with your Adobe CC subscription) there is still a long way to go before it can have the support to be able to use it outside of the same program subscription.
ChatGPT is a powerful assistant. As long as you understand what it is you're looking for in its results, it can save you a lot of time due to its ability to do the heavy lifting for you. This frees your time up to enable you to concentrate on other tasks.
It's conspicuous and fairly intuitive to use; you really can't miss it if you're working in photoshop, for example, and once you attempt to use it, it honestly is pretty user-friendly and pretty clear what you need to do, although that may be too subjective to be true
Most of the time is up. Seldom do you find a down service. It also has improved in token generation (the speed at which it prints answers) so it's usability is pretty much great all the time. Images do take a bit to generate but nothing that breaks anything. New additions like Projects, custom prompts, and some privacy settings improve experience
As I have noted in previous answers, the integration of Adobe Firefly is already done for you. It is part of the Adobe Suite and works seamlessly with all other Adobe products. If you don't happen to use Adobe products, it works just like any other AI image creation tool in that you can save and download your creations to edit in whatever software tools you prefer.
Midjourney was not in this list but that is the most similar to Firefly in my opinion. I find that Adobe Firefly and Midjourney have a lot of overlap. The generative fill options on Photoshop and Illustrator also include very similar use cases with generating photography and extending areas of a photo to imagine outside of the crop.
Where ChatGPT is better: ChatGPT has significantly more use cases - it's much more versatile. Some aspects of ChatGPT's user experience are better than Claude's. I prefer ChatGPT's results presentation compared to Claude's. Where Claude excels: Claude is a more skilled writer than ChatGPT. Some aspects of Claude's user experience are better than ChatGPT's. Its image, audio, and video translations are better than ChatGPT's.
Firefly has saved us many hours by being able to generate images that were otherwise hard to find, or images that we'd need to request licenses to use. Those time saving equate to money savings as team members can move on to other paid tasks more quickly.
When using the generative fill feature, being able to extend the aspect ratio of images we already have in our library has saved us both time and money.
Using Firefly has been a useful part of our strategy to introduce Generative AI to our clients, which helps us stay on the front foot with new developments.