Adobe's Firefly models and services power generative AI features in Adobe creative apps, with features that can be used in Photoshop, Premiere Pro (beta), and the Firefly web app.
N/A
Frame.io
Score 9.1 out of 10
N/A
Frame.io is a video collaboration platform, supporting the video editing process by providing creative teams with time stamped comments, annotations and hashtags, and an accelerated sharing and approval process.
$15
per user/per month
Pricing
Adobe Firefly
Frame.io
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Pro
$15
per user/per month
Team
$25
per user/per month
Free
Free
For up to 2 users
Enterprise
Contact sales team
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Adobe Firefly
Frame.io
Free Trial
Yes
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Adobe Firefly
Frame.io
Considered Both Products
Adobe Firefly
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose Adobe Firefly
Adobe Firefly has more advanced generative AI capabilities if you are looking to create something specific
Photoshop provides a far more extensive and complete set of features, largely due to it being a far older product that has been through decades more development time with feed back from creatives and artists to build on. Adobe Firefly is still extremely new and dare I say, in …
I think compared to its competitors it is a lot more high-quality because it integrates to all of the Adobe suite applications directly in which is something that I utilize quite a lot. For the other external applications they don't integrate like that. But I think it is still …
I don't know of other generative AI models integrated within other services. However, I have other generative AI references that, although they did not appear in the list generated by you, here I include one about some that I have used. DALLE-E MidJurney AWS Generative AI …
Midjourney was not in this list but that is the most similar to Firefly in my opinion. I find that Adobe Firefly and Midjourney have a lot of overlap. The generative fill options on Photoshop and Illustrator also include very similar use cases with generating photography and …
Honestly it's more to do with specific purpose and my love for the brand. I use a wide range of Adobe products and always have done. Plus comparing ChatGPT against Firefly is a tough ask as ChatGPT is more focused on text based solutions.
I’ve tried other design tools like Canva and Midjourney, which are both great in their own ways. Canva is excellent for quick, easy-to-use templates and basic design needs, and it’s very beginner-friendly. Midjourney, on the other hand, has impressive AI capabilities for …
I found that when using ChatGPT for generating images, the whole end result looked amateurish. Image quality was loose and not at all photo realistic. Although neither engine can generate text on an image to a useable standard, Firefly has far superior image rendering and the …
Photoshop at the end of the day can do a lot more than Adobe firefly, and probably most of the other software on the market for media generation. However, Adobe Photoshop requires extensive training for results and quite a bit more of training for excellent results. That would …
While ChatGPT is sort of the leader, in my opinion, Firefly is more accessible and seems a little for user friendly. Particularly if you are at all familiar with any other Adobe design products. I have only used a trial version of Kittl so I am not all that familiar with …
I cannot get the product list to Midjourney/Discord, but that is the AI we started on before dabbling in Firefly. TBH, Firefly is sorely lacking in the creativity department compared to MJ. Results are often childish and a bit off until you really get the hang of the prompts …
Firefly is really the only one that is embedded into a complementary product, so it has a huge edge right there. However, it doesn't seem to be on par yet with Midjourney or Dall-E when it comes to results of your prompts, but it's better than the other ones I listed.
Adobe Firefly biggest difference from Adobe Illustrator's generative image tools is not being vector-based like Illustrator. Firefly is a little more pared down in it's interface and a little easier to pick up use, but is also therefore more limited in user settings. Overall, …
This works a lot better than Canva's image generator, and seems to return much more relevant images, even when using the exact same prompt. Canva's function also doesn't have all the specific filters, styles etc, to help you narrow down the exact style of image you need. Canva …
Adobe Firefly provides images of much higher quality than the Copilot image generator and without credit limitations, allowing for more continuous experimentation. Although I haven’t used Shutterstock’s AI yet, I no longer see the need to rely on image banks for most of our …
Adobe Firefly couples well with the other Adobe Apps we use for our organisation, so the overall subscription includes other products we can leverage. We find that FireFly produces the same, if not better results that it's AI competitors such as ChatGPT and Google Gemini.
Adobe Firefly is as easy, if not easier to use versus its competitors in the creative space. However, because it is so easy, it lacks the ability to tweak its settings to the degree a creative would expect. The biggest benefits is its integration into Adobe Photoshop and it's …
I like Adobe Firefly because if you are already familiar with the platform, it's easier to integrate into photoshop and the creative cloud suite. There are also more options that something like Dalle with Chat GPT. If it is something you do for a living, I'd recommend this over …
I think Adobe Firefly has a little more cutting edge image creation technology behind it, and in comparison was able to generate better looking images on our test prompts faster than it did in DALL-E with Copilot. Copilot still worked pretty well, but Firefly has a lot of tools …
We use Vimeo for hosting videos on our portfolio page, and for that, Vimeo is superior. However for multiple stakeholders reviewing a video to give notes, frame.io seemed to be superior and more intuitive.
Frame.io is better when being compared to the google drive as a platform just because of the usability. Frame.io has a more simple design format, that makes organizing projects and file structures much more readily available when doing a quick search. The ability to review and …
We previously used Wipster to edit our films but switched to Frame.io when we needed a more robust system that allowed for user permissions, more types of edits (text & drawing), and an archive option for finished films. We are a year into the switch and are happy with the …
Frame is easily the most efficient video review service of the options i've tried. Wipster is a close second, followed by Vimeo. Trello is listed only b/c it can be tailored for whatever need you have - though I recognize it isn't a true video review system. Wipster's drawbacks …
We used to use Dropbox as our main point of uploading and holding videos, but it was such a hassle because our edits came separately. It was almost just used as storage, and we had to have a separate email(s) with all of the edits coming from different departments. With …
I last used Wipster around 4-5 months ago, but I felt downtrodden by both their business practices and interface. Wipster sprung a new pricing model on users. This pricing model made no sense, was extremely pricey for no reason, and felt like a punch in the gut by a new and …
Adobe Firefly is great for quickly generating multiple design options, which is ideal for fast-paced projects like social media content and ad visuals. It’s especially useful when we need to create visually consistent assets across various platforms without a lot of manual work. However, the tool has room for improvement. Customization options can feel limited, making it challenging to achieve highly specific looks. The consistency of design style across different projects can sometimes vary, and the collaboration tools, while helpful, could be more user-friendly for large teams.
By far Frame is the best video review service out there mainly due to how easy it is to introduce to new users, including on the client side. There is not much instruction required in order to share and edit with a client and ask them to start providing feedback - the system is designed to invite users to give notes and that alone is worth the money.
Frame.io easily collects edits submitted by internal or external team members.
Frame.io allows our internal team to keep track of edits on films and have internal communication regarding edits and still keep everything within the platform.
Frame.io allows our links to films to be tracked and expire if need be.
The upload speeds to frame and from Frame to Vimeo or Dropbox are fast!
Has mild compatibility issues depending on what software or needs you have pre existing.
While it does have deep customization, the areas it can apply to are bit narrow. It’s good quality, but we still find a few missing features and often supplement with human interaction.
Has a bit of a problem with file size uploads, which is tough in media related tasks.
There have been a couple of times that the review links I have sent have not worked, and it crashed sitewide. I think Frame.io is still working out some kinks, but when I have a tight deadline it's frustrating getting blamed for a broken link when it's Frame.io's website having a meltdown.
I would like to be able to export all the timecoded edits directly to my timeline instead of having to reference the website or extension in Premiere. There may already be a way to have this done, but I haven't seen it or it hasn't been properly explained.
It's a mild inconvenience to automatically be signed up to get an email for every single edit that has taken place in my video. I know this is a reach, but there isn't much to complain about when it comes to Frame.io. I had to manually go in and opt out of the hundreds of emails I was getting sent for someone just leaving comments on my upload.
Because while Adobe Firefly is a good tool (and comes integrated to a certain extent with your Adobe CC subscription) there is still a long way to go before it can have the support to be able to use it outside of the same program subscription.
It's conspicuous and fairly intuitive to use; you really can't miss it if you're working in photoshop, for example, and once you attempt to use it, it honestly is pretty user-friendly and pretty clear what you need to do, although that may be too subjective to be true
I've used other video review systems, Frame was the only one I didn't question how they allowed you to review - I just started reviewing. It's that simple. It's easy to set up projects, invite collaborators, and then provide a final cut for download. It's naturally built for the kind of work that TV/Film & video production companies do.
I've only reached out to Frame.io a few times but they responded quickly and offered achievable solutions. The fact that I haven't had to reach out to them more is proof that the platform is easy to use, reliable, and can run on its own. The only issues we have had were related to uploading issues on our end.
As I have noted in previous answers, the integration of Adobe Firefly is already done for you. It is part of the Adobe Suite and works seamlessly with all other Adobe products. If you don't happen to use Adobe products, it works just like any other AI image creation tool in that you can save and download your creations to edit in whatever software tools you prefer.
Midjourney was not in this list but that is the most similar to Firefly in my opinion. I find that Adobe Firefly and Midjourney have a lot of overlap. The generative fill options on Photoshop and Illustrator also include very similar use cases with generating photography and extending areas of a photo to imagine outside of the crop.
We use Vimeo for hosting videos on our portfolio page, and for that, Vimeo is superior. However for multiple stakeholders reviewing a video to give notes, frame.io seemed to be superior and more intuitive.
Firefly has saved us many hours by being able to generate images that were otherwise hard to find, or images that we'd need to request licenses to use. Those time saving equate to money savings as team members can move on to other paid tasks more quickly.
When using the generative fill feature, being able to extend the aspect ratio of images we already have in our library has saved us both time and money.
Using Firefly has been a useful part of our strategy to introduce Generative AI to our clients, which helps us stay on the front foot with new developments.
Frame.io has cut review time in half for us. When compared to the olden days of email threads for video review, I'll never want to go back. This is a huge time saver.
Frame.io gives a high sense of professionalism. I've had multiple clients express their delight with the application. It helps our feedback process, but also keeps our clients happy.