AccuRanker vs. Advanced Web Ranking

Well suited:

• for an agency or SEO company
• for marketing dep. of ecommerce
• if you are a freelancer that doing inhouse SEO for yourself or your customers.

Not for you:

• if youre new to SEO (too many jargon, new words and shortcuts)
• if you just need to monitor your SEO company (use Google Search Console instead, it is simpler)

Incentivized

Advanced Web Ranking is helpful to companies that require higher website ranking, where there is keyword management through ranking and tracking. More so, to acquire a comprehensive report concerning the opponents, Advanced Web Ranking is readily resourceful. The content creation and management have been fostered by Advanced Web Ranking also.

Incentivized

• competition tracking
• keyword tracking with tagging and historical rankings positions
• SoV (share of voice) metrics that helps to understand traffic opportunities
• Grump ;) (their Tiger that shows you current Google algo behavior)
• keyword discovery - they can show you where you have some opportunities to get more traffic with your current content
• more data and reports when you integrate GSC and GA

Incentivized

• Advanced Web Ranking is a low-cost solution for SEO reporting, suitable for medium-sized businesses that can't afford more expensive solutions of this type.
• It's also very scalable in some respects, particularly the availability of unlimited keyword tracking, which is preferable to certain solutions that charge by the keyword.
• There are also a number of other features in the product not directly related to the reporting of performance which some users will find useful.

Incentivized

• action dashboard - with commands what to do today, what should I focus on first place, to create targets and a way how to reach them
• email reports - should be embeded into message, not added as pdf attachement. Just like Google Search Console is doing it.
• add Google Places as a separate report/tool

Incentivized

• Updating reports when adding new keywords can be slow, taking a day or so to update.
• Large keyword projects can be slow to update.
• If you have a large number of keywords to track, the costs escalate quickly.

Incentivized

• allows to group keywords (by tags) and reports tags as a bunch of kws
• competition reporting (with keywords positions and rank tracking in time)
• SoV - share of voice - metric, that allows you to see true potential of your keywords
• search intent - identifies informational/navigational/commercial/transactional keywords (even in Polish!)
• integration with Google Analytics and Google Search Console gives more and more data that you may analyze

Incentivized

We switched our rank tracking software from Raven Tools when they dropped rank tracking several years ago. We moved to AWR and realized how inaccurate Raven Tools was when it came to keyword rank tracking. Even when raven Tools added rank tracking back, we never switched back, AWR is more accurate and reliable as a keyword rank tracking tool.

Incentivized

• + it was easier to see what competition is doing - you may see their "backstage"
• + easy way to monitor group of keywords (tagging) so no need to focus on particular keyword
• - takes some time to analyze whole domain
• - no whitelabel reports (it would save a lot of time)

Incentivized

• It stayed within our client's allotted budget (which drives more business our way down the road!)
• Updated information in real-time assures our clients that they get the most accurate information possible, as quickly as possible.
• It's been only slightly detrimental to my workflow (which is one little drawback of the program) sometimes I have to enlist the help of a keyword generator (because i find the one with the program a bit lacking)

Incentivized