TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Agorapulse

    Score8.7 out of 10
    Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
    Agorapulse is a social media management tool that aims to help mid-sized businesses and agencies better manage their Facebook, Twitter, TikTok, Instagram, LinkedIn, and YouTube activity. This social media management tool allows users to post content, engage with their community, and download reports from a single dashboard that is designed to be intuitive. Conversations are captured with the inbox -- depending on the social network, it captures comments, mentions, direct/private…

    $49

    per user

    Buffer

    Score8.4 out of 10
    Small Businesses (1-50 employees)
    Buffer is a social sharing tool. When browsing content, clicking on the Buffer icon automatically stores the content and schedules posts to social media channels throughout the day.

    $6

    per month per channel

    Pricing
    AgorapulseBuffer
    Editions & Modules
    Standard
    $99
    up to 10 profiles
    Professional
    $149
    up to 10 profiles
    Advanced
    $199
    per month up to 10 profiles
    Custom
    Custom Pricing
    Free
    $0
    Essentials
    $6
    per month per channel
    Team
    $12
    per month per channel
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    AgorapulseBuffer
    Free Trial
    YesYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    YesYes
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional DetailsAll plans are free for 30 days. Additional profiles cost $15/profile.A discount is offered for annual billing.
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    AgorapulseBuffer
    Considered Both Products
    Agorapulse
    Chose Agorapulse
    Have not used other products similar to Agorapluse in my career.
    Incentivized
    Chose Agorapulse
    Buffer feels outdated and hard to use in comparison. The layout is hard to use and complicated. Agorapulse is intuitive and modern.

    Incentivized
    Chose Agorapulse
    Agorapulse is my favorite out of all its competitors. However, when only managing 5 or fewer channels, Buffer becomes the platform I recommend as it is much more cost-effective.
    Incentivized
    Chose Agorapulse
    Buffer used to be the go-to software but in my humble opinion, Agorapulse surpasses their offerings.

    What Agorapulse offers in one package would cost much more than Buffer and their separate disjointed offerings.
    Incentivized
    Chose Agorapulse
    There were a number of reasons I chose AgoraPulse including the ability to have roles and approval of contributors and ability to allow only certain people access to certain accounts.
    Incentivized
    Chose Agorapulse
    AgoraPulse does extremely well against both Buffer and Social Jukebox. I think AgoraPulse has deeper analytics without having to cost as much as Buffer. AgoraPulse provides a better sense of control versus Social Jukebox.
    Incentivized
    Chose Agorapulse
    AgoraPulse is really catching up to Buffer in terms of content scheduling, even though our primary need for AgoraPulse is comment/message management.

    Hootsuite has a clunky UI, an unsatisfactory publishing feature, and almost no monitoring. AgoraPulse is far and ahead in all …
    Incentivized
    Buffer
    Chose Buffer
    Agorapulse is a good option for agencies as it has much better workflow management.
    Incentivized
    Chose Buffer
    Buffer holds its own against Agorapulse, and its intuitive and minimalistic platform means you can do exactly what you need to do on a small scale. This is something that brings me back to the platform again and again - the ease of use. Agorapulse handles more content and …
    Incentivized
    Chose Buffer
    Agorapulse is a great option but was too pricey for our nonprofit.
    Incentivized
    Chose Buffer
    I prefer buffer over Hootsuite and prefer Agorapulse over Buffer. The reason I would recommend Agorapulse over Buffer is that when using more platforms Buffer becomes too expensive.
    Incentivized
    Chose Buffer
    They all solve the same problem. Buffer initially started as a way to post content without worrying about the "when". Just add to the queue, and Buffer would post at a specified cadence. Buffer's price point is very reasonable for the services that it offers. They've grown …
    Incentivized
    Chose Buffer
    I think Sprout Social and Hootsuite provide more comprehensive tools and analytics, but they have more expensive plans that don't cater to businesses of all sizes. Plus, all of that complexity can make it hard to find what you're looking for. That's where Buffer excels. It's …
    Incentivized
    Chose Buffer
    Agora Pulse is great for agencies while Buffer is great for small businesses and nonprofits.
    Incentivized
    Chose Buffer
    It comes at a better price and is easier to navigate and learn with.
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Features
    AgorapulseBuffer
    Listening/monitoring
    Comparison of Listening/monitoring features of Agorapulse and Buffer
    Feature
    Agorapulse
    8.5
    181 Ratings
    Buffer
    -
    Ratings
    Boolean keyword searches9.3151 Ratings00 Ratings
    Filtering out noise/spam7.9153 Ratings00 Ratings
    Broad channel coverage8.22 Ratings00 Ratings
    Publishing
    Comparison of Publishing features of Agorapulse and Buffer
    Feature
    Agorapulse
    8.5
    250 Ratings
    Buffer
    8.6
    68 Ratings
    Content planning and scheduling9.3247 Ratings9.068 Ratings
    Audience targeting8.7160 Ratings00 Ratings
    Content optimization7.31 Ratings8.061 Ratings
    Workflow management8.7210 Ratings8.857 Ratings
    Engagement
    Comparison of Engagement features of Agorapulse and Buffer
    Feature
    Agorapulse
    8.3
    245 Ratings
    Buffer
    -
    Ratings
    Automated routing and prioritization7.742 Ratings00 Ratings
    Customer interaction histories8.6222 Ratings00 Ratings
    Bulk actions8.6203 Ratings00 Ratings
    Marketing
    Comparison of Marketing features of Agorapulse and Buffer
    Feature
    Agorapulse
    7.6
    142 Ratings
    Buffer
    -
    Ratings
    Lead generation7.4110 Ratings00 Ratings
    Content marketing7.98 Ratings00 Ratings
    Paid media management8.21 Ratings00 Ratings
    Campaigns and promotions6.9119 Ratings00 Ratings
    Channel coverage/integration
    Comparison of Channel coverage/integration features of Agorapulse and Buffer
    Feature
    Agorapulse
    8.7
    255 Ratings
    Buffer
    -
    Ratings
    Twitter8.5228 Ratings00 Ratings
    Facebook9.4255 Ratings00 Ratings
    LinkedIn9.3104 Ratings00 Ratings
    Google+7.25 Ratings00 Ratings
    Instagram9.3241 Ratings00 Ratings
    Pinterest9.11 Ratings00 Ratings
    YouTube8.127 Ratings00 Ratings
    Reporting/analytics
    Comparison of Reporting/analytics features of Agorapulse and Buffer
    Feature
    Agorapulse
    9.2
    229 Ratings
    Buffer
    8.3
    63 Ratings
    Campaign success analytics9.4198 Ratings8.363 Ratings
    Real-time tracking9.7195 Ratings00 Ratings
    Competitor analysis8.4161 Ratings00 Ratings
    Account management
    Comparison of Account management features of Agorapulse and Buffer
    Feature
    Agorapulse
    9.0
    244 Ratings
    Buffer
    9.0
    65 Ratings
    Role-based user permissions & privileges9.3228 Ratings9.052 Ratings
    Mobile access8.7215 Ratings9.062 Ratings
    User Ratings
    AgorapulseBuffer
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.5
    (342 ratings)
    8.8
    (88 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    9.1
    (87 ratings)
    8.0
    (14 ratings)
    Usability
    8.6
    (66 ratings)
    9.0
    (24 ratings)
    Availability
    9.1
    (3 ratings)
    8.2
    (2 ratings)
    Performance
    8.2
    (2 ratings)
    8.0
    (2 ratings)
    Support Rating
    8.7
    (69 ratings)
    6.1
    (23 ratings)
    Online Training
    9.1
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    8.3
    (6 ratings)
    8.0
    (2 ratings)
    Configurability
    7.3
    (2 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    4.6
    (2 ratings)
    8.6
    (2 ratings)
    Vendor post-sale
    9.1
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Vendor pre-sale
    9.1
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)