Aha! Roadmaps vs. Miro

Aha! Roadmaps

114 Reviews and Ratings

Miro

8,629 Reviews and Ratings

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
Aha! Roadmaps	Score7.6 out of 10	N/A	Aha! Roadmaps is used to set strategy, prioritize features, and share visual plans. It includes Aha! Ideas Essentials for crowdsourcing feedback. For an integrated product development approach, Aha! Roadmaps and Aha! Develop can be used together. The software is available with a 30-day trial.	$59 per month per user
Miro	Score9.2 out of 10	N/A	Miro empowers cross-functional teams to flow from early discovery through final delivery on a shared, AI-first canvas. With the canvas as the prompt, Miro’s AI capabilities keep teams in the flow of work, and scale shifts in ways of working.	$10 per month per user

Pricing

Aha! Roadmaps

Miro

Premium: $59
per month per user
Enterprise: $99
per month workspace owner or contributor
Enterprise+: $149
per month workspace owner or contributor

1. Free - To discover what Miro can do. Always free: $0
2. Starter - Unlimited and private boards with essential features: $8
per month (billed annually) per user
3. Business - Scales collaboration with advanced features and security: $16
per month (billed annually) per user
4. Enterprise - For work across the entire organization, with support, security and control, to scale: contact sales
annual billing per user

Pricing Offerings
Aha! Roadmaps	Miro
Free Trial
Yes	Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No	Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No	No

Optional

Optional

Startup pack available for early stage companies.

Monthly billing also available at $10 per month for the Starter plan, or $20 for the Business plan.

Community Pulse
Key User Insights
	Aha! Roadmaps	Miro
Considered Both Products	Aha Verified User Chose Aha! Roadmaps productboard was used in the organization when I arrived, but after assessing productboard, I felt it was too lightweight for our ambitious product goals. It's also critical, especially in a startup, that we focus our limited capacity on the work that matters most. Aha! far and … Incentivized Helpful?	Miro Verified User Chose Miro well we use them in combo. it generally depends if i want to have somethign mocked up quickly or if i need to do something more specific or structured or ready to be integrated. Incentivized Helpful? Megan Lewis Product Operations in Product Management at Eneco (Oil & Energy, 1001-5000 employees) Chose Miro Miro has a different purpose from Figma, so I don't see them as similar. It would be interesting to see better integration for the workflow there. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Miro It's better. I used to be a Mural fan when Miro first launched, but Miro immediately outpaced Mural in terms of performance, ease of use, and killer features. There was a time where mapping complex systems required a lot of custom shape creation in Visio, especially when the … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Miro Miro best of these for our use case in terms of navigation and usability. Aha covers most of the use cases, but the non licensed sharing / editing options are too limited, and missing some other key things like voting. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Miro Jamboard is very basic and doesn't offer the same amount of functionality. FigJam seems to be on par with features but just doesn't feel the same or as easy to use. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Miro While some of the tools are offering similar functionality to what Miro does, Miro still ranks higher than these tools, in my opinion. Aha's tool is very basic and evolving, but it looks like Miro's first version of their tool. The Figma and FigJam tools are evolving to include … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Miro Miro's pricing, accessibility, and integrations stand out favorably. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Miro Miro is the better option because there is no sync issue and more tools within the whiteboard. Some of the templates in Aha seem too generic or difficult to customize. In order to make these come to life, there is a lot of preparation needed before visualizing with a business … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Miro Functionality of Miro is much better. Teams was lacking features and buggy. Would often crash. Incentivized Helpful? Nate Glasman Sr. Analyst in Corporate at Levi Strauss & Co. (Apparel & Fashion, 10,001+ employees) Chose Miro I only evaluated them. Its very expensive on its mostly geared toward roadmaps, so wouldn't fit our other functions for more product-related tracking Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Miro Miro excels in its simplicity - while Aha has a much more robust feature set when it comes to reporting and views, it is much easier for new team members to get up and running with Miro. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Miro Miro has great enterprise support. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Miro The flexibility and dynamics of Miro makes it a lot better for presentations than MS PowerPoint. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Miro A box is a great tool for storing information. It is not designed well for meeting facilitation though it offers some functionality for collaborative space. Asana is another great tool for managing tasks and projects, but when it comes to collaboration, it has many limitations. … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Miro It offers many features we used in the past across different products. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Miro Of course, Above maintained products are not Replacing the Miro and they are solving different problems for us, but there are also a lot of similarities between the products. like Prototyping or collaborating through Figma Boards Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Miro I prefer Miro over Figma because it is organized better and when presenting to others it has a better flow Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Miro Each one is unique in its own way. Ex: AHA for vision and road map and Confluence for Sharing any information and creating content. But MIRO does both in a single tool. and the Best part is the Autosave feature and instant updates of any changes and Real-time collaboration. … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Miro Miro doesn't compare, Miro is its own level\category. Miro is THE ONLY remote collaboration tool for our team because of the ease of use, features, and experience for multiple collaborators. We love Miro!I use Miro EVERY DAY in my job - to communicate with people all over the … Incentivized Helpful?
	Would buy again
	No answers on this topic	No answers on this topic
	Delivers good value for the price
	No answers on this topic	No answers on this topic
	Happy with the feature set
	No answers on this topic	No answers on this topic
	Lived up to sales and marketing promises
	No answers on this topic	No answers on this topic
	Implementation went as expected
No answers on this topic	No answers on this topic

User Ratings
	Aha! Roadmaps	Miro
Likelihood to Recommend	9.0 (19 ratings)	9.2 (5571 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew	- (0 ratings)	9.5 (149 ratings)
Usability	10.0 (2 ratings)	9.1 (104 ratings)
Availability	- (0 ratings)	9.8 (16 ratings)
Performance	- (0 ratings)	9.0 (15 ratings)
Support Rating	9.1 (7 ratings)	7.5 (46 ratings)
Online Training	- (0 ratings)	10.0 (4 ratings)
Implementation Rating	- (0 ratings)	9.1 (3586 ratings)
Configurability	- (0 ratings)	7.9 (9 ratings)
Ease of integration	- (0 ratings)	8.2 (3934 ratings)
Product Scalability	- (0 ratings)	8.2 (15 ratings)
Vendor post-sale	- (0 ratings)	7.2 (5 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale	- (0 ratings)	5.8 (5 ratings)