AkkenCloud vs. Dice TalentSearch

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
AkkenCloud
Score 6.9 out of 10
N/A
AkkenCloud is a cloud-based ATS developed by Akken Inc in New Hampshire. This product offers the full suite of features typical of applicant tracking systems: A user-friendly interface and mobile device integration Batch or mass communication with potential candidates via multiple channels such as email or by leveraging its integration with social networking sites (e.g. LinkedIn) Instantaneous posting to multiple job boards Job alerts and category sorted…N/A
Dice TalentSearch
Score 8.6 out of 10
N/A
Dice TalentSearch (formerly Open Web) is a recruiting solution that works by consolidating data on potential employees from 130 different sites.N/A
Pricing
AkkenCloudDice TalentSearch
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
AkkenCloudDice TalentSearch
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
AkkenCloudDice TalentSearch
Considered Both Products
AkkenCloud
Chose AkkenCloud
At the time we purchased Akken, it was the least expensive on the market that met our needs. It was fairly intuitive, which is important, and we liked the idea that it was hosted remotely because we had had several instances with our inhouse system going down and nearly lost …
Chose AkkenCloud
This tool was the first of its kind that we implemented in our company. This tool has a vast variety of great features that have made my life so easy. The system has an inbuilt smart referral tracking
Chose AkkenCloud
I've used Sendouts, Bullhorn, Primepoint, and ADP's Workforce Now. If I had been here, I would have never selected Akken. It is truly the worst ATS I've ever seen and I can't believe they are in business. It blows my mind because they are really a horrible, horrible ATS.
Chose AkkenCloud
AkkenCloud was the first software I used in my career as a recruiter. Since using Akken, I have used TempWorks, Avionte, and JobScience/SalesForce. I do like Akken.
Chose AkkenCloud
I haven't used any similar Cloud products.
Chose AkkenCloud
I've used a few different CRM's in my career through different industries. AkkenCloud is as user friendly as any other one I have used.
Chose AkkenCloud
We preferred the ability to go with Mac computers. That was the number one selling point for us. Besides that we liked the ease of the product. The email interface looked exactly like Outlook. The calendar the same. The price was also a big selling point. It came in slightly …
Dice TalentSearch
Chose Dice TalentSearch
Like already said Monster or Career Builder doesnt have the filter option to filter the candidate current location which Dice TalentSearch has in it. Overall experience is much satisfied to used to eradicate the duplicate profiles. the first thing say about the Dice …
Chose Dice TalentSearch
Dice TalentSearch is now a brand and has its market presence when it comes to US market. With right filters and pool it is most preferred job and talent search tool which an organisation aims for.
Chose Dice TalentSearch
I received multiple candidates only after hours of posting my jobs on other sites. And for a fraction of the cost! I not only received quality candidates but also candidates who actually matched my requirements. These sites also have the option for proactive outreach and …
Chose Dice TalentSearch
Overall, I think we selected and have stayed with DICE because it has a strong concentration of IT specific resources. They also seem to have a good number of candidates who are looking for independent consulting work which best aligns with our current business model. But I …
Chose Dice TalentSearch
They all have different features, methodologies/techniques and value. I feel overall Dice Open Web is the most Flexible, Creative Search Tool; yet have already used JobDiva for several years and seems to be a very good ATS. I've been recruiting, sourcing and managing talent …
Chose Dice TalentSearch
what works well for Dice Open Web is that it can be used internally within a company very well. the groups of jobs with same skill sets across teams can be well displayed on the web and thus candidates can apply to multiple jobs in one go. ability to customize email templates, …
Chose Dice TalentSearch
The decision to go with Dice wasn't up to me, it was up to technology leaders and decision makers above me. The decision to go with it originally was the belief that it was more robust than it really was and was a true competitor to the likes of Linkedin. It seems a bit …
Chose Dice TalentSearch
We are also using Hiring Monster/Tech Fetch/Career Builder, apart from Dice. However, the search results of Dice are best. We have closed many candidates through Dice including many niche skills that are rarely available in the market or on other job boards. I highly recommend …
Chose Dice TalentSearch
The newer version is the biggest drawback in Dice as it has errors and bugs. Dice had the best feature for ease of use in the older version.
Chose Dice TalentSearch
Dice Open Web is the dominant app which connects the network on a large number and helps employees and candidate.
Chose Dice TalentSearch
Dice is the best job board out there. There is no alternative for it.
Chose Dice TalentSearch
This is a great tool where it consolidates the search results from over 50+ social and professional networking sites and brings you a large pool of candidates. This includes a combination of both active as well as a passive pool of resources. Helped a lot with a few of the …
Chose Dice TalentSearch
I would rate Dice Open Web in the middle of the stack of tools we use. Not great, but worth using at times. Entelo and SeekOut are probably better from a search capability, although SeekOut is still a bit new.
Chose Dice TalentSearch
Dice Open Web Social Media connect using Big Data technology makes it worth while using the application. Dice in itself has a huge database of candidates with updated resume which is good enough for us to find the right candidates matching our profile. With Dice the Candidates …
Features
AkkenCloudDice TalentSearch
Recruiting / ATS
Comparison of Recruiting / ATS features of Product A and Product B
AkkenCloud
7.7
Ratings
4% below category average
Dice TalentSearch
8.4
Ratings
5% above category average
Job Requisition Management6.10 Ratings9.10 Ratings
Company Website Posting8.60 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Publish to Social Media8.60 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Job Search Site Posting8.70 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Resume Management9.40 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Duplicate Candidate Prevention9.20 Ratings4.20 Ratings
Candidate Search4.00 Ratings8.50 Ratings
Applicant Tracking7.50 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Collaboration4.80 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Task Creation and Delegation8.20 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Email Templates8.00 Ratings8.60 Ratings
User Permissions9.00 Ratings7.70 Ratings
Notifications and Alerts7.00 Ratings7.60 Ratings
Reporting8.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Customized Application Form00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
AkkenCloudDice TalentSearch
Small Businesses
Breezy HR
Breezy HR
Score 9.1 out of 10
Breezy HR
Breezy HR
Score 9.1 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Breezy HR
Breezy HR
Score 9.1 out of 10
Breezy HR
Breezy HR
Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprises
PeopleStrong
PeopleStrong
Score 9.9 out of 10
PeopleStrong
PeopleStrong
Score 9.9 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
AkkenCloudDice TalentSearch
Likelihood to Recommend
6.0
(0 ratings)
9.5
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
7.6
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.0
(0 ratings)
8.5
(0 ratings)
Performance
6.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
2.0
(0 ratings)
8.5
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
6.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
AkkenCloudDice TalentSearch
Likelihood to Recommend
Akkencloud has worked extremely well as an ATS software for our recruiting firm. We deal with a huge volume of clients and candidates and it is difficult to track and manage the different orders and people we have in play. The statuses and on stop shop for requisition details have made things tremendously easy to give real time updates to our managers and client partners.
Read full review
This platform is probably more suited for small to mid-size companies that may not have super specific roles and requirements. Organizations also that may not have a large budget for these types of programs also could be a good fit as it does offer some value, but probably falls behind in the cutting edge and super competitive landscape for platforms or organizations. It's probably less appropriate for large companies or places that are investing in current and cutting edge technology or products.
Read full review
Pros
  • Notes about candidates are the most helpful because as a recruiter, we talk to so many people a day that it is common to forget the details of some conversations.
  • Being able to notify other people in the organization about notes that are put in is very beneficial if the note needs to be in the system and someone should know about it!
  • Being able to open "candidates" or "job orders" or something else in a new tab is great because then we can have the inbox open while also the candidate notes open, for example.
Read full review
  • Flexibility to be creative, i.e. can do both boolean searches as well as use intelligence searches.
  • Posting jobs is easy to do and manage.
  • Customer support is at a very high level, with a personal touch, (this is very rare and very much appreciated)!
Read full review
Cons
  • When a candidate applies via applicant tracking, there is a glitch that you have to submit that candidate a different way than other candidates by using the applied function, then submitting from there. That is a glitch that should be fixed. You should be able to submit the same way and allow the system to track that he was a candidate from applicant tracking.
  • The new alerts from notes works well. The only change I would make is it is rather slow to attach a note now since the new messages have been added to notes.
  • Email should be a bit quicker. Rather than going to the server every 5 minutes, it should pull much quicker. That ability is rather easy to fix. Especially since we receive emails on our phone much quicker than we receive from Akken.
Read full review
  • The recent update is not highlighting most of the keywords which is really annoying.
  • I feel the UI should be more improved.
  • Sometimes we see lots of resumes with lots of manipulated details and fake experience to get the attention.
  • Sometimes most of the resumes don’t have contact details and it's difficult to get in touch with candidates.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
There is no reason for us to make a switch. Everybody in the office is familiar with it and it allows us to get our work done faster. There are no pressing issues that would warrant a change at this point
Read full review
I'm assuming we will keep using DICE, but Indeed and LinkedIn are starting to prove their value and strength in having candidates/consultants use their services to look for new opportunities.
Read full review
Usability
Akken is quite easy to use however there are a few more complex functions or multi steps to go through to run reports and find historic information.
Read full review
Its already I mentioned it is used to search the resumes of relevant profile upon the request of clients requirement. comfortable with filters to validate the profile before the resumes open. Can be able to locate the profile which the recruiter is willing to work on the requirement. Little more costly when compared to other job portals.
Read full review
Performance
It's an average tool. The calendar function isn't great, email is slow, and there always seem to be day-to-day issues. The functionality is mostly there for a staffing firm, but there are plenty of areas of improvement still needed
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
The best support we have received has been from sales. Customer success is pretty much a joke. We have been yelled at by customer success reps; been told to take a screenshot of something we are not seeing; been told there are no issues on there in when Akken hadn't been working for hours, only to have it magically fixed shortly after we reported the problem; and been told engineering was working on a problem for weeks without resolution. If you are going to be working with IT Staffing companies, you have to understand that we have a modicum of knowledge in IT, and you can't BS us. Honesty will get you a lot farther than stringing us along with BS.
Read full review
Dice provides ease of sourcing candidates and is the most useful in staffing industry. However, we still recommend the team to provide older version access to the user which was much easier and flexible to use. Dice posting is the best feature in Dice. The Boolean Search feature in Dice is also very useful.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Encourage your team to watch the training videos available.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
At the time we purchased Akken, it was the least expensive on the market that met our needs. It was fairly intuitive, which is important, and we liked the idea that it was hosted remotely because we had had several instances with our inhouse system going down and nearly lost all of our CRM/ATS databases at one time.
Read full review
what works well for Dice Open Web is that it can be used internally within a company very well. the groups of jobs with same skill sets across teams can be well displayed on the web and thus candidates can apply to multiple jobs in one go. ability to customize email templates, set alerts and notifications are really 3-5 steps processes. Candidates can also track their own progress once their process starts for filling an opening in a group.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • The company has pumped enough money into trying to make Akken good that they aren't interested in changing again.
  • Seriously a terrible ATS which slows people down due to the useless functions.
  • More time lost from people needing to fix issues that arise due to the system requirements.
Read full review
  • Utilized a great deal of my hiring budget without producing any applicants.
  • Used a large amount of my time with no payoff.
  • Frustration with signing a contract and after payment did not receive any assistance with the traction of my job posts.
Read full review
ScreenShots