athenaClinicals vs. PointClickCare Core EHR Platform

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
athenaClinicals
Score 9.6 out of 10
N/A
N/AN/A
PointClickCare Core EHR Platform
Score 9.8 out of 10
N/A
PointClickCare provides their cloud-based technology for the senior care industry, the PointClickCare Core EHR Platform.N/A
Pricing
athenaClinicalsPointClickCare Core EHR Platform
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
athenaClinicalsPointClickCare Core EHR Platform
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
athenaClinicalsPointClickCare Core EHR Platform
Considered Both Products
athenaClinicals
Chose athenaClinicals
Not listed- though Athena is much preferred compared to past systems used.
Chose athenaClinicals
For a surgery center application, it is much better to use a system that is uniquely designed for surgery centers. Using Athena as a less than desirable work around has been a frustrating experience.
Chose athenaClinicals
Greenway was absolutely horrible. Not intuitive, no right-click functionality, poor integration, and flexibility. athenaClinicals surpasses it in every aspect.
Chose athenaClinicals
They have the same very similar capabilities. They have a quality measures icon and a great dashboard to help close gaps in care. Centricity does not have those features in this current version.
Chose athenaClinicals

I was not the one that selected the program but we all voted as a group and the CEO made the decision. We actually voted to do more research because of the expense of the program.

It is easy to use and to learn with many available templates. We are in psychiatry and there were …

Chose athenaClinicals
eCW allows for customization on the provider level whereas athenaClinicals requires standardization by specialty. Meaningful Use and other quality programs are more challenging on eCW. eCW templates are quite different looking from those that are in athenaClinicals and the flow …
Chose athenaClinicals
Again, I would recommend Athena second on this list...and it's all practice specific. If a practice can afford Athena, then it's an ok system...but do not expect an intuitive system such as Cerner that can be fully customized and follows a physician workflow better.
Chose athenaClinicals
athenahealth is more user friendly. There customer service center does not leave you without an answer. The reports can be built to each managers specific needs and the gathering of data from the EMR is fast. WOW!
PointClickCare Core EHR Platform
Chose PointClickCare Core EHR Platform
PointClickCare Core EHR Platform was selected because it is organized much more cleanly than MatrixCare. In PointClickCare Core EHR Platform, patient EHRs are laid out in such a way that accessing different kinds of information is a lot quicker than it is in MatrixCare. In …
Chose PointClickCare Core EHR Platform
Each software that we had previously was best in KLAS at one time or another. However, they were individual software solutions instead of one solution for all of our business objectives. PCC has made it easier for our financial and clinical staff to have one tool that spans the …
Features
athenaClinicalsPointClickCare Core EHR Platform
Billing and Claims Management
Comparison of Billing and Claims Management features of Product A and Product B
athenaClinicals
8.4
Ratings
11% above category average
PointClickCare Core EHR Platform
9.0
Ratings
18% above category average
Real-time eligibility verification9.30 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Claims management8.30 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Coding9.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Patient billing8.30 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Financial Reporting7.00 Ratings5.00 Ratings
Patient Scheduling
Comparison of Patient Scheduling features of Product A and Product B
athenaClinicals
8.2
Ratings
4% above category average
PointClickCare Core EHR Platform
9.0
Ratings
13% above category average
Rule-based scheduling7.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Automated appointment reminders8.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Automated patient check-in8.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Multi-location support8.30 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Calendar interface8.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Electronic Medical Records
Comparison of Electronic Medical Records features of Product A and Product B
athenaClinicals
8.9
Ratings
20% above category average
PointClickCare Core EHR Platform
6.5
Ratings
11% below category average
Charting / document management8.90 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Templates8.90 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Patient portal10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile/tablet support8.40 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Fax integration9.90 Ratings1.00 Ratings
Integration with other EMR and PM systems7.60 Ratings1.00 Ratings
Workflow automation8.80 Ratings5.00 Ratings
Speech recognition9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Customization7.20 Ratings10.00 Ratings
E-prescribing9.90 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Medical Security and Privacy
Comparison of Medical Security and Privacy features of Product A and Product B
athenaClinicals
8.4
Ratings
1% above category average
PointClickCare Core EHR Platform
9.5
Ratings
14% above category average
HIPAA compliance8.30 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Role-based permission levels9.90 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Data backups and redundancy8.30 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Local mode / networking failsafe7.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Workflow and Scale
Comparison of Workflow and Scale features of Product A and Product B
athenaClinicals
8.8
Ratings
15% above category average
PointClickCare Core EHR Platform
8.0
Ratings
5% above category average
Task tracking8.30 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Specialty-specific workflows8.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Multi-office / multi-physician capabilities9.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
athenaClinicalsPointClickCare Core EHR Platform
Small Businesses
RXNT
RXNT
Score 8.0 out of 10
athenaClinicals
athenaClinicals
Score 9.6 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
CareLogic EHR
CareLogic EHR
Score 10.0 out of 10
CareLogic EHR
CareLogic EHR
Score 10.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Epic
Epic
Score 9.5 out of 10
Epic
Epic
Score 9.5 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
athenaClinicalsPointClickCare Core EHR Platform
Likelihood to Recommend
6.8
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.2
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.0
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
athenaClinicalsPointClickCare Core EHR Platform
Likelihood to Recommend
athenaClinicals is well suited from a single physician office to an enterprise healthcare system. The only specialty that they cannot cover is oncology that includes chemotherapy infusions (the dosing is very complicated and requires a specific oncology system).
Read full review
I would describe the positives as: ease of billing; multiple double-checking mechanisms to properly balance census and cash; clear and simple user interface. One not familiar with AR for skilled nursing facilities can obtain good working knowledge of the day-to-day operations likely in less than a fortnight, and can perform independent of on-hand help in three months.
Read full review
Pros
  • Athena is able to create a medication list from the patient's pharmacy purchase history. This aides in compiling a comprehensive list quickly, especially when the patients do not know what meds they are on. The downside to this module is that every time that you add a medication that is not on the list, it turns it into an order that the provider needs to sign. There are many times that you need to make an addition, that the provider does not want to sign as an order.
  • The patient history module is easy to configure to meet the needs of the organization.
Read full review
  • PCC's census tracking is exceptional, allowing for Medicare's 100 days to be managed on the MDS and billing part.
  • Cash applications are simple to use. Any errors in payments can be investigated immediately to confirm whether the discrepancy is due to inaccurate write-offs, billing, and even census.
  • The month-end closing process is clean and efficient, allowing the billers to ensure all matters for the previous month have been satisfactorily addressed.
Read full review
Cons
  • The cost is very high compared to other programs.
  • Some people find the program difficult to learn.
  • The billing software requires more work than is described when they are trying to sell you the program.
  • The sales staff that we dealt with had the vibe of car salesmen. At times very pushy and the room for negotiation grew at each interaction. The high cost first quoted is very negotiable but they "up charge" for many things.
Read full review
  • Sometimes the platform is slow to load.
  • I'd like to see the ability to search for patients using both the first and last name. Currently it's only one or the other.
  • I'd be interested to see the ability to change the color of the interface.
Read full review
Usability
Overall the system is good. Actually, this was supposed to be the universal EMR when it came out during the Bush administration.
Read full review
Overall great product. Reporting could be much better and they are working on that.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
No answers on this topic
I have implemented PCC in over 100 buildings and have used it for almost 5 years. I can count maybe 2 times in 5 years when PCC downtime caused an issue for our facilities. I would say their availability rating exceeds a 10 compared to other software systems.
Read full review
Support Rating
They are always there. Friendly and organized.
Read full review
If by "overall support" you mean "customer service," only once were they unable to provide the assistance I needed--but it wasn't an important element of my job so no matter.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
Have already stated. People learn differently and PCC needs to adapt to that model instead of all eLearning. Offer the client different learning packages.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Greenway was absolutely horrible. Not intuitive, no right-click functionality, poor integration, and flexibility. athenaClinicals surpasses it in every aspect.
WoundExpert was well suited to wound healing and hyperbaric medical practices. If athenaClinicals had the right forms and ability to accommodate wound care and HBO workflows, it would be a good competitor.
Read full review
PointClickCare Core EHR Platform was selected because it is organized much more cleanly than MatrixCare. In PointClickCare Core EHR Platform, patient EHRs are laid out in such a way that accessing different kinds of information is a lot quicker than it is in MatrixCare. In PointClickCare Core EHR Platform, all of the tabs (profile, census, DX list, progress notes, assessments, etc.) are easily accessible with just one click. In MatrixCare this is not the case, as you must first click into another menu before being able to access other tabs. Also the overall look of PointClickCare Core EHR Platform is more professional and streamlined.
Read full review
Return on Investment
No answers on this topic
  • The platform has helped to increase productivity within our organization.
  • Increased workflow efficiency leading to less hours spending time compiling data.
  • Allowed our organization to expand the number of business opportunities -- the increased workload is manageable due to PointClickCare Core EHR Platform's usability.
Read full review
ScreenShots