athenaClinicals vs. RXNT

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
athenaClinicals
Score 9.6 out of 10
N/A
N/AN/A
RXNT
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
RXNT is an ambulatory healthcare tech solution for medical practices and healthcare organizations. Since 1999, RXNT has offered integrated, customizable, ONC-certified Clinical and Practice Management software for medical offices, healthcare organizations, and specialists across the United States. RXNT's suite of technology includes provides Clinical EHR, Practice Management, Medical Billing and RCM, E-Prescribing, Practice Scheduling, Patient Portal for medical professionals.…
$118
per month per provider
Pricing
athenaClinicalsRXNT
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
EHR Bundle
$118
per month per provider
PM Bundle
$207
per month per provider
Full Suite
$319
per month per provider
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
athenaClinicalsRXNT
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
Additional DetailsPricing includes a free setup and training period, free data transfer and storage, and free in-house support. Plus, 24/7 cloud-based access, regular system upgrades, and mobile applications. All plans are per provider, and the pricing structure is an annual contract, billed monthly or yearly. A 10% discount is available for yearly billing.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
athenaClinicalsRXNT
Considered Both Products
athenaClinicals
Chose athenaClinicals
Not listed- though Athena is much preferred compared to past systems used.
Chose athenaClinicals
For a surgery center application, it is much better to use a system that is uniquely designed for surgery centers. Using Athena as a less than desirable work around has been a frustrating experience.
Chose athenaClinicals
Greenway was absolutely horrible. Not intuitive, no right-click functionality, poor integration, and flexibility. athenaClinicals surpasses it in every aspect.
Chose athenaClinicals
They have the same very similar capabilities. They have a quality measures icon and a great dashboard to help close gaps in care. Centricity does not have those features in this current version.
Chose athenaClinicals

I was not the one that selected the program but we all voted as a group and the CEO made the decision. We actually voted to do more research because of the expense of the program.

It is easy to use and to learn with many available templates. We are in psychiatry and there were …

Chose athenaClinicals
eCW allows for customization on the provider level whereas athenaClinicals requires standardization by specialty. Meaningful Use and other quality programs are more challenging on eCW. eCW templates are quite different looking from those that are in athenaClinicals and the flow …
Chose athenaClinicals
Again, I would recommend Athena second on this list...and it's all practice specific. If a practice can afford Athena, then it's an ok system...but do not expect an intuitive system such as Cerner that can be fully customized and follows a physician workflow better.
Chose athenaClinicals
athenahealth is more user friendly. There customer service center does not leave you without an answer. The reports can be built to each managers specific needs and the gathering of data from the EMR is fast. WOW!
RXNT
Chose RXNT
RXNT offers better quality and more customization for the cost. Valant was very expensive regardless if you wanted a few features or the entire EHR. eClinical Works is easy to duplicate records but then it can take a while to update with current information. And their updated …
Chose RXNT
I think RXNT has many aspects that work well
Chose RXNT
10 out of 10 for RXNT for how easy is is to use. The other systems don’t have the easy flow and functionality that RXNT has. The cost was also a reason we went with RXNT, there were no hidden fees they were transparent with everything and have so many different options that fit …
Chose RXNT
We've always been on the lookout for the right software that meets our clients’ clinical needs but is also robust on the medical billing side. Something that integrates well for
Chose RXNT
It is difficult to compare the two as we do not use RXNT for scheduling and billing; this is done using a different application. I do not know why. But as for note creating and editing, my preference is for RXNT, which is more intuitive and flexible for me compared with all the …
Chose RXNT
OnStaff was outdated in all terms of billing. I am relieved to be no longer using Prime Clinical Systems/OnStaff.
Features
athenaClinicalsRXNT
Billing and Claims Management
Comparison of Billing and Claims Management features of Product A and Product B
athenaClinicals
8.4
Ratings
11% above category average
RXNT
-
Ratings
Real-time eligibility verification9.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Claims management8.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Coding9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Patient billing8.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Financial Reporting7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Patient Scheduling
Comparison of Patient Scheduling features of Product A and Product B
athenaClinicals
8.2
Ratings
4% above category average
RXNT
10.0
Ratings
24% above category average
Rule-based scheduling7.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Automated appointment reminders8.30 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Automated patient check-in8.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Multi-location support8.30 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Calendar interface8.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Electronic Medical Records
Comparison of Electronic Medical Records features of Product A and Product B
athenaClinicals
8.9
Ratings
20% above category average
RXNT
7.0
Ratings
4% below category average
Charting / document management8.90 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Templates8.90 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Patient portal10.00 Ratings5.00 Ratings
Mobile/tablet support8.40 Ratings5.00 Ratings
Fax integration9.90 Ratings2.00 Ratings
Integration with other EMR and PM systems7.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Workflow automation8.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Speech recognition9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Customization7.20 Ratings00 Ratings
E-prescribing9.90 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Medical Security and Privacy
Comparison of Medical Security and Privacy features of Product A and Product B
athenaClinicals
8.4
Ratings
1% above category average
RXNT
10.0
Ratings
19% above category average
HIPAA compliance8.30 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Role-based permission levels9.90 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Data backups and redundancy8.30 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Local mode / networking failsafe7.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Workflow and Scale
Comparison of Workflow and Scale features of Product A and Product B
athenaClinicals
8.8
Ratings
15% above category average
RXNT
7.5
Ratings
1% below category average
Task tracking8.30 Ratings5.00 Ratings
Specialty-specific workflows8.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Multi-office / multi-physician capabilities9.90 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
athenaClinicalsRXNT
Small Businesses
RXNT
RXNT
Score 8.0 out of 10
athenaClinicals
athenaClinicals
Score 9.6 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
CareLogic EHR
CareLogic EHR
Score 10.0 out of 10
CareLogic EHR
CareLogic EHR
Score 10.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Epic
Epic
Score 9.5 out of 10
Epic
Epic
Score 9.5 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
athenaClinicalsRXNT
Likelihood to Recommend
6.8
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.2
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
athenaClinicalsRXNT
Likelihood to Recommend
athenaClinicals is well suited from a single physician office to an enterprise healthcare system. The only specialty that they cannot cover is oncology that includes chemotherapy infusions (the dosing is very complicated and requires a specific oncology system).
Read full review
I believe it is best suited for organizations that wish to utilize all of the available tools within the system. I do not believe it is well suited for organizations that lack a deep understanding of the revenue cycle process or individuals who try to cut corners in managing accounts receivables. It works extraordinarily well in situations where one will take the time to set up all the available tools, test them, and make them part of their workflow.
Read full review
Pros
  • Athena is able to create a medication list from the patient's pharmacy purchase history. This aides in compiling a comprehensive list quickly, especially when the patients do not know what meds they are on. The downside to this module is that every time that you add a medication that is not on the list, it turns it into an order that the provider needs to sign. There are many times that you need to make an addition, that the provider does not want to sign as an order.
  • The patient history module is easy to configure to meet the needs of the organization.
Read full review
  • Patient portal, communications with patients and an easy to use platform for communciation.
  • Auto posting features and claim scrubbing tools.
  • Claim management and the ability to easily work to correct claims errors, rejections, and denials.
  • Easy customizable reporting tools for administrative analysis on our perfromance.
Read full review
Cons
  • The cost is very high compared to other programs.
  • Some people find the program difficult to learn.
  • The billing software requires more work than is described when they are trying to sell you the program.
  • The sales staff that we dealt with had the vibe of car salesmen. At times very pushy and the room for negotiation grew at each interaction. The high cost first quoted is very negotiable but they "up charge" for many things.
Read full review
  • The ads are very annoying and distracting. I would like to see these removed.
  • Sometimes when using the prescribing feature, the list of meds is unscrollable. This is likely a glitch that could be fixed.
  • Same thing after choosing a pharmacy. The preview page of Rx is unscrollable, making it impossible to see all of them. Would like to see this fixed as well.
  • Would like to be able to add more templates under the macros but it is not clear how to do this.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
This is exactly what we needed and I can’t think of of another system that can give us better service and customer support for a better price.
Read full review
Usability
Overall the system is good. Actually, this was supposed to be the universal EMR when it came out during the Bush administration.
Read full review
Having used other systems, there are still items I would like to see added to this platform. Additional forms, understanding of how to load those forms into the system. Ability for clients to access those forms. And the ability to upload forms that are coming in externally. This would be helpful.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
No answers on this topic
We have not had any issues being able to connect.
Read full review
Performance
No answers on this topic
No issues at all. We could not be happier with this system
Read full review
Support Rating
They are always there. Friendly and organized.
Read full review
Super quick response to any questions I have had
Read full review
Online Training
No answers on this topic
Gabrielle and all the rest of our trainers were great!
Read full review
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
It was fantastic! The training was easy and everyone was very helpful and knowledgeable throughout the whole process
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Greenway was absolutely horrible. Not intuitive, no right-click functionality, poor integration, and flexibility. athenaClinicals surpasses it in every aspect.
WoundExpert was well suited to wound healing and hyperbaric medical practices. If athenaClinicals had the right forms and ability to accommodate wound care and HBO workflows, it would be a good competitor.
Read full review
RXNT offers better quality and more customization for the cost. Valant was very expensive regardless if you wanted a few features or the entire EHR. eClinical Works is easy to duplicate records but then it can take a while to update with current information. And their updated version...you might need a magnifying glass especially if you are using on a laptop. I love the larger font and overall appeal of RXNT much better
Read full review
Scalability
No answers on this topic
It fits our needs perfectly
Read full review
Return on Investment
No answers on this topic
  • I've only been using for 2 mo so I can't answer this quite yet.
  • I do know that the cost is much more affordable and an excellent value for the cost.
  • I am a single provider practice so I have had to learn the admin side and the provider side which has been a challenge at times.
Read full review
ScreenShots

RXNT Screenshots

Screenshot of RXNT's clinical EHR software, where users can document patient encounters using custom templates & notes, as well as manage medications and demographic information.Screenshot of RXNT's Medical Billing software, used to automate billing for faster payments, improve the claims pipeline, and improve the revenue cycle with advanced analytics.Screenshot of RXNT's Practice Scheduling software, used to manage patient and resource appointments, accept co-pays and payments, as well as manage patient reminders.Screenshot of RXNT's Patient Portal, designed for modern patient engagement and telemedicine, patients can manage all their health information, appointments, labs, and messages.