athenaClinicals vs. Tebra EHR

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
athenaClinicals
Score 9.6 out of 10
N/A
N/AN/A
Tebra EHR
Score 1.0 out of 10
N/A
Tebra (formerly Kareo) provides a full-featured EHR. It is designed to fit the way its users work. Some key features include: Comprehensive Dashboard, Scheduler, Documentation, and Notes.
$150
per provider/per month
Pricing
athenaClinicalsTebra EHR
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Kareo Practice Management (Low Claim Volume)
$150
per provider/per month
Kareo Practice Management (Unlimited Claims)
$300
per provider/per month
Kareo Billing Services
Contact sales team
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
athenaClinicalsTebra EHR
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
athenaClinicalsTebra EHR
Considered Both Products
athenaClinicals
Chose athenaClinicals
Not listed- though Athena is much preferred compared to past systems used.
Chose athenaClinicals
For a surgery center application, it is much better to use a system that is uniquely designed for surgery centers. Using Athena as a less than desirable work around has been a frustrating experience.
Chose athenaClinicals
Greenway was absolutely horrible. Not intuitive, no right-click functionality, poor integration, and flexibility. athenaClinicals surpasses it in every aspect.
Chose athenaClinicals
They have the same very similar capabilities. They have a quality measures icon and a great dashboard to help close gaps in care. Centricity does not have those features in this current version.
Chose athenaClinicals

I was not the one that selected the program but we all voted as a group and the CEO made the decision. We actually voted to do more research because of the expense of the program.

It is easy to use and to learn with many available templates. We are in psychiatry and there were …

Chose athenaClinicals
eCW allows for customization on the provider level whereas athenaClinicals requires standardization by specialty. Meaningful Use and other quality programs are more challenging on eCW. eCW templates are quite different looking from those that are in athenaClinicals and the flow …
Chose athenaClinicals
Again, I would recommend Athena second on this list...and it's all practice specific. If a practice can afford Athena, then it's an ok system...but do not expect an intuitive system such as Cerner that can be fully customized and follows a physician workflow better.
Chose athenaClinicals
athenahealth is more user friendly. There customer service center does not leave you without an answer. The reports can be built to each managers specific needs and the gathering of data from the EMR is fast. WOW!
Tebra EHR
Chose Tebra EHR
Kareo EHR is less reliable than Therapy Notes. Therapy Notes is less feature rich, for example, it is not as good for generating PDF bills to send to customers (we had to write our own code for this), but it always works.

Kareo's telehealth platform is less reliable than Doxy. …
Chose Tebra EHR
I selected Kareo EHR because it was a lot simpler to use and the customer service was definitely better. Every representative I have spoken to has been super friendly and helpful.
Chose Tebra EHR
You don't have them in your lineup but TheraNest and CounSol are two awesome EHR software services for small practices and/or startup businesses. If you are a new owner or have 0-10 employees then give them a try. CounSol provides an excellent success coach to get you …
Chose Tebra EHR
Kareo the exact same thing that NextGen does but for the fraction of the cost. NextGen is not the best system for a smaller practice. Kareo supports a large patient base to a small patient base. NextGen is not user-friendly and it not an asset [due to] the money you have to put …
Chose Tebra EHR
I have used QuickEMR and Kareo hands-down is just more appealing and easier to enter all patient information. I did find that QuickEMR for administrative staff is more user-friendly. Kareo provides more patient information and is very good about seeing what is missing in order …
Features
athenaClinicalsTebra EHR
Billing and Claims Management
Comparison of Billing and Claims Management features of Product A and Product B
athenaClinicals
8.4
Ratings
11% above category average
Tebra EHR
4.0
Ratings
61% below category average
Real-time eligibility verification9.30 Ratings4.00 Ratings
Claims management8.30 Ratings4.00 Ratings
Coding9.00 Ratings4.00 Ratings
Patient billing8.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Financial Reporting7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Patient Scheduling
Comparison of Patient Scheduling features of Product A and Product B
athenaClinicals
8.2
Ratings
4% above category average
Tebra EHR
1.0
Ratings
155% below category average
Rule-based scheduling7.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Automated appointment reminders8.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Automated patient check-in8.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Multi-location support8.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Calendar interface8.30 Ratings1.00 Ratings
Electronic Medical Records
Comparison of Electronic Medical Records features of Product A and Product B
athenaClinicals
8.9
Ratings
20% above category average
Tebra EHR
2.2
Ratings
107% below category average
Charting / document management8.90 Ratings1.00 Ratings
Templates8.90 Ratings2.00 Ratings
Patient portal10.00 Ratings1.00 Ratings
Mobile/tablet support8.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Fax integration9.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Integration with other EMR and PM systems7.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Workflow automation8.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Speech recognition9.00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Customization7.20 Ratings1.00 Ratings
E-prescribing9.90 Ratings1.00 Ratings
Medical Security and Privacy
Comparison of Medical Security and Privacy features of Product A and Product B
athenaClinicals
8.4
Ratings
1% above category average
Tebra EHR
8.0
Ratings
4% below category average
HIPAA compliance8.30 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Role-based permission levels9.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Data backups and redundancy8.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Local mode / networking failsafe7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Workflow and Scale
Comparison of Workflow and Scale features of Product A and Product B
athenaClinicals
8.8
Ratings
15% above category average
Tebra EHR
-
Ratings
Task tracking8.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Specialty-specific workflows8.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Multi-office / multi-physician capabilities9.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
athenaClinicalsTebra EHR
Small Businesses
RXNT
RXNT
Score 8.0 out of 10
athenaClinicals
athenaClinicals
Score 9.6 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
CareLogic EHR
CareLogic EHR
Score 10.0 out of 10
CareLogic EHR
CareLogic EHR
Score 10.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Epic
Epic
Score 9.5 out of 10
Epic
Epic
Score 9.5 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
athenaClinicalsTebra EHR
Likelihood to Recommend
6.8
(0 ratings)
1.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
1.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.2
(0 ratings)
1.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
athenaClinicalsTebra EHR
Likelihood to Recommend
athenaClinicals is well suited from a single physician office to an enterprise healthcare system. The only specialty that they cannot cover is oncology that includes chemotherapy infusions (the dosing is very complicated and requires a specific oncology system).
Read full review
We love the system. Very user-friendly and any level of user can pick up the system without training. Being a trainer myself, this is an awesome selling point. I have not found a specialty that cannot pick up and run with the program. Kareo has eliminated our "wasted" time and given us new avenues to use our resources more productively.
Read full review
Pros
  • Athena is able to create a medication list from the patient's pharmacy purchase history. This aides in compiling a comprehensive list quickly, especially when the patients do not know what meds they are on. The downside to this module is that every time that you add a medication that is not on the list, it turns it into an order that the provider needs to sign. There are many times that you need to make an addition, that the provider does not want to sign as an order.
  • The patient history module is easy to configure to meet the needs of the organization.
Read full review
  • Catching missing patient info
  • Catching missing insurance info
  • Providing mailing addresses
Read full review
Cons
  • The cost is very high compared to other programs.
  • Some people find the program difficult to learn.
  • The billing software requires more work than is described when they are trying to sell you the program.
  • The sales staff that we dealt with had the vibe of car salesmen. At times very pushy and the room for negotiation grew at each interaction. The high cost first quoted is very negotiable but they "up charge" for many things.
Read full review
  • Sales representative needs to know the product. We got tied into a miscommunication on the package (contract vs trial) when we decided to work with them
  • Tutorials are good but can be overwhelming because there are a lot of features to learn
  • Charging to migrate client data was a determining factor on whether we wanted to continue with the company. If we knew this upfront it would've allowed us to say "no thanks". And to add the charges are not cheap and they charge a la carte (i.e., demographics, billing, progress notes, forms/intake info)
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
Kareo was a massive waste of money. It's an unreliable product without promised features and sold by a disingenuous sales team. We will stick to reliable services like Doxy, Therapy Notes, etc.
Read full review
Usability
Overall the system is good. Actually, this was supposed to be the universal EMR when it came out during the Bush administration.
Read full review
The user interface is fine but it the app constantly freezes or crashes.
Read full review
Support Rating
They are always there. Friendly and organized.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Greenway was absolutely horrible. Not intuitive, no right-click functionality, poor integration, and flexibility. athenaClinicals surpasses it in every aspect.
WoundExpert was well suited to wound healing and hyperbaric medical practices. If athenaClinicals had the right forms and ability to accommodate wound care and HBO workflows, it would be a good competitor.
Read full review
I have used QuickEMR and Kareo hands-down is just more appealing and easier to enter all patient information. I did find that QuickEMR for administrative staff is more user-friendly. Kareo provides more patient information and is very good about seeing what is missing in order to file a claim.
Read full review
Return on Investment
No answers on this topic
  • ROI definitely a positive
Read full review
ScreenShots