TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Atlassian Confluence vs. Microsoft Teams

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Confluence

    Score7.8 out of 10
    N/AConfluence is a collaboration and content sharing platform used primarily by customers who are already using Atlassian's Jira project tracking product. The product appeals particularly to IT users.

    $6.40

    per month per user

    Microsoft Teams

    Score7.9 out of 10
    N/AMicrosoft Teams combines video conferencing software with team collaboration tools. The communications platform allows MS Office users to conduct conference calls and share files via SharePoint, and join or initiate a group chat.

    $4.80

    per month per user

    Pricing
    ConfluenceMicrosoft Teams
    Editions & Modules
    Free
    $0
    Free for 10 Users
    Standard
    $6.40
    per month per user
    Premium
    $12.30
    per month per user
    Data Center
    220,000.00
    40,001+ Users - Annually
    Enterprise
    Contact Sales
    Microsoft Teams Essentials
    $4.80
    per month per user
    Microsoft Teams Enterprise
    $5.25
    per month (paid yearly) per user
    Microsoft Teams Enterprise
    $5.25
    per month per user
    Microsoft 365 Business Basic
    $7.20
    per month per user
    Microsoft 365 Business Standard
    $15
    per month per user
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    ConfluenceMicrosoft Teams
    Free Trial
    YesYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoYes
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional DetailsPrices shown here reflect prices for deployments with 100 users or less. The prices decrease wien the user base surpasses 100.Discounts are available for non profit organizations.
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    ConfluenceMicrosoft Teams
    Considered Both Products
    Atlassian
    Chose Confluence
    I think both are good
    Incentivized
    Chose Confluence
    We use Jira for the IT tickets, so the step to use Atlassian Confluence was the logical decisson.
    Incentivized
    Chose Confluence
    I personally prefer the usage of alternative project management or document storage apps. Atlassian Confluence is useful in having a centralised spot for multiple types of information, as opposed to Trello for example, and is much more structured. However, it has low visual …
    Incentivized
    Chose Confluence
    It integrates well with other SAAS products and has been our industry standard for all projects that we're involved in.
    Incentivized
    Chose Confluence
    The way the knowledge is stored and indexed in Atlassian Confluence is very advanced so that it can be easily accessed. It supports including images, links, etc so that we can convey the idea very well. Overall it's very useful for organizations where new features are rolled …
    Incentivized
    Chose Confluence
    Atlassian Confluence is more intuitive than MS SharePoint, however, SharePoint has some reach features because of the MS integration with its tools stack.
    Incentivized
    Chose Confluence
    Confluence smashes competitors out of the ballpark. There is no compromise for quality and great product design with Atlassian
    Incentivized
    Chose Confluence
    Google Drive is not comparable to confluence, but it was the only other means for collaboration of documents and a shared hub for resources. But it serves more as a folder for resources rather than a repository of pages in information with links, documents, collaboration, …
    Incentivized
    Chose Confluence
    There are complementary and we are in fact using both of them in out organisation. We are using Google Drive for advanced real-time cooperation when creating documents, since Google Drive can handle this in a more streamlined and easier way than Confluence. Still, Confluence …
    Incentivized
    Chose Confluence
    I have used other tools that allow for documentation and housing of other business-related documents but none that I used had the same integration or general ability to add and edit information. I am also a general user so I don't know how easy/difficult the backend is, but …
    Incentivized
    Microsoft
    Chose Microsoft Teams
    Microsoft Teams is a complementary tool I used in my software panel. So it can cover many cases where partners are not using the same tools as the ones used in my firm. It is a complementary tool with other ones like Miro, Slack, and Jira, for example, in order to facilitate …
    Incentivized
    Chose Microsoft Teams
    With Microsoft Teams you can better check each one's agenda. The background when in a meeting is better. Microsoft Teams also have more options for integrations in place.
    It's also easier and more intuitive.
    It also offers more options of communicating and not only video …
    Incentivized
    Chose Microsoft Teams
    Microsoft Teams is just a nicer front end to SharePoint for file and document management but it also has a good communication network for internal and external parties. It's easy to use on mobile device as well. It also integrates well with Microsoft Power Platform etc, meaning …
    Incentivized
    Chose Microsoft Teams
    I think Teams is ahead of the game. Its tight integration with the Microsoft suite has no rival. Having Azure as the backend provides a secure environment in the cloud with content accessible anytime anywhere. Microsoft is heavily investing in the product and constantly adding …
    Incentivized
    Chose Microsoft Teams
    We used Adium in the past for our direct department and HipChat company-wide. I didn't mind HipChat so much, but it didn't have nearly as many features as Teams offers. Adium was a big pain in my butt because it is used for not just the company, but everything else you are …
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Features
    ConfluenceMicrosoft Teams
    Project Management
    Comparison of Project Management features of Atlassian Confluence and Microsoft Teams
    Feature
    Atlassian Confluence
    5.3
    111 Ratings
    Microsoft Teams
    6.9
    191 Ratings
    Task Management6.389 Ratings7.5146 Ratings
    Gantt Charts7.912 Ratings5.975 Ratings
    Scheduling7.221 Ratings6.1161 Ratings
    Workflow Automation3.960 Ratings7.1100 Ratings
    Mobile Access3.884 Ratings8.1183 Ratings
    Search5.7109 Ratings6.7168 Ratings
    Visual planning tools2.488 Ratings7.1117 Ratings
    Communication
    Comparison of Communication features of Atlassian Confluence and Microsoft Teams
    Feature
    Atlassian Confluence
    6.9
    111 Ratings
    Microsoft Teams
    7.8
    200 Ratings
    Chat6.415 Ratings8.7199 Ratings
    Notifications5.2109 Ratings7.8198 Ratings
    Discussions3.9103 Ratings8.4186 Ratings
    Surveys7.015 Ratings8.3111 Ratings
    Internal knowledgebase7.6103 Ratings8.1121 Ratings
    Integrates with GoToMeeting6.03 Ratings6.547 Ratings
    Integrates with Gmail and Google Hangouts9.37 Ratings5.743 Ratings
    Integrates with Outlook9.610 Ratings9.1156 Ratings
    File Sharing & Management
    Comparison of File Sharing & Management features of Atlassian Confluence and Microsoft Teams
    Feature
    Atlassian Confluence
    5.9
    111 Ratings
    Microsoft Teams
    7.6
    185 Ratings
    Versioning6.494 Ratings8.2129 Ratings
    Video files4.171 Ratings7.1157 Ratings
    Audio files3.765 Ratings8.2159 Ratings
    Document collaboration6.5106 Ratings9.2172 Ratings
    Access control8.0104 Ratings8.7155 Ratings
    Advanced security features7.080 Ratings6.8116 Ratings
    Integrates with Google Drive5.947 Ratings5.353 Ratings
    Device sync5.550 Ratings7.5131 Ratings
    User Ratings
    ConfluenceMicrosoft Teams
    Likelihood to Recommend
    6.7
    (128 ratings)
    8.1
    (277 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    9.9
    (19 ratings)
    3.7
    (9 ratings)
    Usability
    6.6
    (15 ratings)
    8.3
    (61 ratings)
    Availability
    9.0
    (3 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    Performance
    8.0
    (5 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    Support Rating
    5.4
    (25 ratings)
    8.3
    (113 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    8.8
    (4 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Configurability
    6.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Contract Terms and Pricing Model
    -
    (0 ratings)
    6.3
    (7 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    8.0
    (4 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    8.0
    (2 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Professional Services
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.0
    (7 ratings)
    Vendor post-sale
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Vendor pre-sale
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)