TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Atlassian Jira vs. Planview ProjectPlace

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Atlassian Jira

    Score8.3 out of 10
    N/AAtlassian Jira is a project management tool, featuring an interactive timeline for mapping work items, dependencies, and releases, Scrum boards for agile teams, and out-of-the-box reports and dashboards.

    $9

    per month per user

    Planview ProjectPlace

    Score8.4 out of 10
    N/AProjectplace is a collaborative work management solution. The vendor says the product is built with teams of all sizes and complexity in mind, from virtual teams of five to entire global enterprises with tens of thousands of active users. It is also designed to incorporate waterfall and agile workflows.N/A
    Pricing
    Atlassian JiraPlanview ProjectPlace
    Editions & Modules
    Standard
    $9
    per month per user
    Premium
    $17
    per month per user
    Enterprise
    Contact Sales
    per year
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Atlassian JiraPlanview ProjectPlace
    Free Trial
    YesYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    YesNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoYes
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional DetailsHigher volume teams may qualify buyers for a discount.
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Atlassian JiraPlanview ProjectPlace
    Considered Both Products
    Atlassian
    Chose Atlassian Jira
    As mentioned before, JIRA is a very big tool which also is the reason why we're using it for complex tasks in our company. Other project management tools are often easier to use and have a nicer UI but they simply don't offer the same amount of settings and features.
    Incentivized
    Planview
    Chose Planview ProjectPlace
    Notion is an open book that allows you to create whatever you want... nice but having some bumpers makes creating and implementing a solution a bit easier. ProjectPlace is simple to get started and use. You might miss out on a cool feature or two, but I think the lack of a …
    Incentivized
    Chose Planview ProjectPlace
    Most of these others don't have many of the features that are available in Planview Projectplace. The agile methodology is in a true sense covered by Planview Projectplace, not by Asana nor Wrike. In Confluence, one has to link up with Jira for full functionality, but in …
    Incentivized
    Chose Planview ProjectPlace
    [In my experience] Jira is more refined, better looking, and easier to become familiar with. Also, the massive market share of Jira helps in consultancy as you can switch between clients easily. Projectplace has many powerful tools but so does Jira, and Jira integrates with our …
    Incentivized
    Chose Planview ProjectPlace
    While I am familiar with a lot of other tools available in the market, my recent experience with Planview Projectplace tools was very positive.
    Gantt charts and reports are the best features of the tools, as they help you present your work in a more engaging way. It performs …
    Incentivized
    Chose Planview ProjectPlace
    Planview Projectplace gives Jira a very tough competition in terms of its very powerful Kanban feature set. Its tracking individual tasks and workload in one single view is also one up on Jira.
    Incentivized
    Chose Planview ProjectPlace
    We selected Planview Projectplace since while Jira is great for Agile software teams, often there was a barrier to entry for project and program managers who were more interested in higher level task tracking around deliverables, etc. Planview Projectplace had enough features …
    Incentivized
    Chose Planview ProjectPlace
    Planview Projectplace and these other project management tools stack up in an honestly very similar way, most offer a similar suite of tools and helpful ways to track and plan all your projects and tasks. I think that Planview Projectplace ultimately has most of the great …
    Incentivized
    Chose Planview ProjectPlace
    Planview has many features for managing and prioritizing projects, cost effective solution and easy to implement. Manage and execute all types of work, efficiently and effectively leverage resources and technology.
    Incentivized
    Chose Planview ProjectPlace
    JIRA was meant for software development, as I said before. It isn't very good for copywriters and designers. I would never work at an organization that used JIRA for copywriting work unless they paid me a lot of money to deal with that frustration. ProjectPlace is great.
    Incentivized
    Chose Planview ProjectPlace
    To me, ProjectPlace is the winner above and beyond all of these. Similar or less expensive, and far more practical functionality. Rather than try to be all things to all people, it focuses on basic functions that apply to most businesses. Beyond Asana, JIRA, and Trello (which …
    Incentivized
    Chose Planview ProjectPlace
    The visuals and functionality of Projectplace, version control and document storage capabilities are the best compared to the tools I have used above
    Incentivized
    Chose Planview ProjectPlace
    Projectplace enables all the users in one single tool to have access to many features: planning of projects, the definition of To Dos, sharing of documents, the creation of documents, communication with project stakeholders whether it be internal or external, have a global …
    Incentivized
    Chose Planview ProjectPlace
    Project place does not replace any of the listed products except for MS Project. We like project place for schedule alignment, easy project switching, and time tracking. The other programs are still used for issue tracking, investigations, documentation, and reporting of …
    Incentivized
    Chose Planview ProjectPlace
    Projectplace works the best for our kind of work because it's not too complicated to ensure a fast project management but it's also not too stripped down so we still can add all the details and files we need.
    Incentivized
    Chose Planview ProjectPlace
    I wasn't the decision maker.
    Incentivized
    Chose Planview ProjectPlace
    • ASANA - It's very limited since we can't illustrate GANTT charts in the same way as with Projectplace.
    • JIRA - Software heavy and not really for us as a customer-focused project department.
    Incentivized
    Chose Planview ProjectPlace
    Our organization has mainly used task management tools such as CA service desk, Jira software or Gantt based project management tools such as Microsoft project. However we have chosen Projectplace for the management of European R&D projects for its repository and its …
    Incentivized
    Chose Planview ProjectPlace
    It is a full and finished software product. Atlassian can be a complete solution after choosing what exactly what extensions you need. That is a lot of work.
    If you just want a complete system, you can use projectplace; it satisfies our wishes perfectly.
    In the end, all of the …
    Incentivized
    Chose Planview ProjectPlace
    We stopped using JIRA because it was not possible to handle multiple projects interacting together and because the cloud edition was too slow.

    Projectplace is faster, but we still encounter difficulties with handling multiple projects interacting together.
    Incentivized
    Chose Planview ProjectPlace
    Projectplace was more usable and knitted together from the outset than as with Wrike or having to customize a lot of features and workflows as with JIRA.
    Incentivized
    Chose Planview ProjectPlace
    Projectplace is oriented to foster communication within the projects which is a key (if not the most important) feature of a PPM tool.
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Features
    Atlassian JiraPlanview ProjectPlace
    Project Management
    Comparison of Project Management features of Atlassian Jira and Planview ProjectPlace
    Feature
    Atlassian Jira
    9.5
    3 Ratings
    Planview ProjectPlace
    7.7
    201 Ratings
    Task Management9.73 Ratings8.4194 Ratings
    Resource Management9.43 Ratings6.7161 Ratings
    Gantt Charts9.32 Ratings7.7174 Ratings
    Scheduling10.02 Ratings7.7172 Ratings
    Workflow Automation10.02 Ratings00 Ratings
    Team Collaboration10.03 Ratings8.7196 Ratings
    Support for Agile Methodology8.73 Ratings8.7154 Ratings
    Support for Waterfall Methodology9.02 Ratings7.8143 Ratings
    Document Management8.93 Ratings9.0187 Ratings
    Email integration9.53 Ratings6.4166 Ratings
    Mobile Access9.03 Ratings7.7150 Ratings
    Timesheet Tracking10.03 Ratings6.0132 Ratings
    Change request and Case Management10.03 Ratings00 Ratings
    Budget and Expense Management9.32 Ratings00 Ratings
    Professional Services Automation
    Comparison of Professional Services Automation features of Atlassian Jira and Planview ProjectPlace
    Feature
    Atlassian Jira
    9.9
    2 Ratings
    Planview ProjectPlace
    -
    Ratings
    Quotes/estimates9.72 Ratings00 Ratings
    Invoicing9.72 Ratings00 Ratings
    Project & financial reporting10.02 Ratings00 Ratings
    Integration with accounting software10.02 Ratings00 Ratings
    User Ratings
    Atlassian JiraPlanview ProjectPlace
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.6
    (190 ratings)
    8.1
    (201 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    9.0
    (35 ratings)
    9.2
    (9 ratings)
    Usability
    9.4
    (31 ratings)
    10.0
    (78 ratings)
    Availability
    5.3
    (3 ratings)
    9.1
    (2 ratings)
    Performance
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    9.1
    (2 ratings)
    Support Rating
    8.8
    (23 ratings)
    8.0
    (75 ratings)
    Online Training
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    9.1
    (1 ratings)
    Configurability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    6.4
    (1 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    7.7
    (8 ratings)
    9.1
    (1 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.1
    (2 ratings)
    Vendor post-sale
    -
    (0 ratings)
    6.4
    (1 ratings)
    Vendor pre-sale
    -
    (0 ratings)
    6.4
    (1 ratings)