AWS Elastic Beanstalk vs. Neocortix

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
AWS Elastic Beanstalk
Score 7.5 out of 10
N/A
AWS Elastic Beanstalk is the platform-as-a-service offering provided by Amazon and designed to leverage AWS services such as Amazon Elastic Cloud Compute (Amazon EC2), Amazon Simple Storage Service (Amazon S3).
$0
Users pay for AWS resources (e.g. EC2, S3 buckets, etc.) used to store and run the application.
Neocortix
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
Neocortix, headquartered in Santa Clara, California, provides Distributed Cloud Computing services running on public Android phones. Neocortix Cloud Services provides scalable compute capacity, running on mobile devices all over the world. This revolutionary service delivers Cloud At the Edge, enabling capabilities in Load/Performance Testing, CDN Testing, Network Telemetry, 3D Image Rendering, Genomics, and Deep Learning.
$149
per month 50 Concurrent instances, 2000 Concurrent Users, Unlimited Tests/Month, 1600 Instance-Hours/Month
Pricing
AWS Elastic BeanstalkNeocortix
Editions & Modules
No Charge
$0
Users pay for AWS resources (e.g. EC2, S3 buckets, etc.) used to store and run the application.
Basic
$149
per month 50 Concurrent instances, 2000 Concurrent Users, Unlimited Tests/Month, 1600 Instance-Hours/Month
Pro
$649
per month 280 Concurrent instances, 11200 Concurrent Users, Unlimited Tests/Month, 8960 Instance-Hours/Month
Starter
Free
10 Concurrent instances, 400 Concurrent Users, 15 Tests, 150 Instance-Hours
Enterprise
Custom
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
AWS Elastic BeanstalkNeocortix
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
AWS Elastic BeanstalkNeocortix
Features
AWS Elastic BeanstalkNeocortix
Platform-as-a-Service
Comparison of Platform-as-a-Service features of Product A and Product B
AWS Elastic Beanstalk
8.0
Ratings
0% above category average
Neocortix
-
Ratings
Ease of building user interfaces8.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Scalability7.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Platform management overhead8.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Workflow engine capability7.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Platform access control8.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Services-enabled integration8.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Development environment creation7.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Development environment replication8.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Issue monitoring and notification8.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Issue recovery9.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Upgrades and platform fixes8.20 Ratings00 Ratings
User Ratings
AWS Elastic BeanstalkNeocortix
Likelihood to Recommend
7.2
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
7.9
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
7.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
7.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
AWS Elastic BeanstalkNeocortix
Likelihood to Recommend
AWS Elastic Beanstalk is well suited for [the] rapid development of applications that use standard compute platforms based on popular programming languages. So getting a Go, Python, Ruby, or Node.js app going in AWS Elastic Beanstalk will be easy. For non-standard applications, containers provide another option for using AWS Elastic Beanstalk. In either case, AWS Elastic Beanstalk is well suited for applications that are [self-contained]. AWS Elastic Beanstalk is also good for development or test environments that need a built-in deployment method. AWS Elastic Beanstalk is less appropriate for complex applications that rely on multiple AWS services. While deploying and running the base code might be easy to get going, it may be difficult to apply permissions and integrations with the other services.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Pros
  • Extremely easy to get set up and get apps deployed.
  • Integrates really well with existing build processes and is manageable through a suite of CLI tools.
  • It is very easy to scale up.
  • The documentation is exceptionally detailed and covers a very wide range of deployment scenarios.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Cons
  • How to more easily integrate with other other AWS services. There are plenty out there, but it's not quite as seamless as I feel like it should be to mix and match products.
  • Make backing up easier when scaling the server. It took quite a bit of time to make sure we had everything set up in case something went wrong.
  • When you are first starting to use AWS, the dashboard can be very intimidating. There are countless products all with names that aren't very indicative of what they actually do.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Likelihood to Renew
As our technology grows, it makes more sense to individually provision each server rather than have it done via beanstalk. There are several reasons to do so, which I cannot explain without further diving into the architecture itself, but I can tell you this. With automation, you also loose the flexibility to morph the system for your specific needs. So if you expect that in future you need more customization to your deployment process, then there is a good chance that you might try to do things individually rather than use an automation like beanstalk.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
The overall usability is good enough, as far as the scaling, interactive UI and logging system is concerned, could do a lot better when it comes to the efficiency, in case of complicated node logics and complicated node architectures. It can have better software compatibility and can try to support collaboration with more softwares
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
As I described earlier it has been really cost effective and really easy for fellow developers who don't want to waste weeks and weeks into learning and manually deploying stuff which basically takes month to create and go live with the Minimal viable product (MVP). With AWS Beanstalk within a week a developer can go live with the Minimal viable product easily.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
- Do as many experiments as you can before you commit on using beanstalk or other AWS features. - Keep future state in mind. Think through what comes next, and if that is technically possible to do so. - Always factor in cost in terms of scaling. - We learned a valuable lesson when we wanted to go multi-region, because then we realized many things needs to change in code. So if you plan on using this a lot, factor multiple regions.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
There are many services like AWS Elastic beanstalk, but there are none with the maturity in the platform or the cost-effectiveness of AWS Elastic Beanstalk. Also, AWS Elastic Beanstalk is the oldest among them, so there are more people with AWS experience than the other platforms. The only thing is their documentation and UX are a bit old, which doesn't stop it from performing greatly, but yes, if you are looking for better UX, then you can check out other options.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • Elastic Beanstalk removes countless hours from development team responsibility, freeing up those resources to instead focus on building the products that our customers want to use.
  • As a business that is already embedded into using EC2 instances, it's essentially free to leverage the work that AWS performs on configuring the Elastic Beanstalk stacks.
  • With Elastic Beanstalk, while there is still a responsibility to ensure that applications can work with updated underlying dependencies, it's much easier when AWS handled the heavy lifting of updating the stacks.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
ScreenShots