Azure Logic Apps vs. Camunda

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Azure Logic Apps
Score 8.6 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft offers the Azure Logic Apps as a cloud-based integration service, supporting data and application integration.
$0
per execution
Camunda
Score 7.9 out of 10
N/A
Camunda is a process orchestration tool designed to help organizations design, automate, and improve any process. Built for business and IT collaboration using BPMN and DMN standards, Camunda aims to enable seamless integration across endpoints to transform mission-critical processes.N/A
Pricing
Azure Logic AppsCamunda
Editions & Modules
Actions
$0.000025
per execution
Standard Connector
$0.000025
per execution
Enterprise Connector
$0.001
per execution
Integration Account - Basic
$0.42
per hour
Integration Account - Standard
$1.37
per hour
Self-Managed Enterprise
Contact Sales
per year
SaaS Enterprise
Contact Sales
per year
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Azure Logic AppsCamunda
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Azure Logic AppsCamunda
Considered Both Products
Azure Logic Apps
Chose Azure Logic Apps
The other tools which we have been using do not suite well to integrate other systems (online and onprem) and also other azure services. This tool provide lot of prebuilt connectors that helps us to use the functions within the workflows. This tool is well suited for technical …
Chose Azure Logic Apps
Azure Logic Apps that's just easier than any other service and integrates great with Azure.
Chose Azure Logic Apps
AWS Step Functions and AWS Lambda
Chose Azure Logic Apps
Other services can, on some level, offer some type of subscriber/publisher pattern. For example, you could have an Azure Function watch for changes to a database and then sync the data to Cosmos DB. However, with a few clicks, Logic Apps can easily handle the task without …
Chose Azure Logic Apps
The plug-and-play style of design is ideal for removing the increasing costs of custom development.
Chose Azure Logic Apps
This is very dependent on the line of work you are in and the unique company requirements, as is the case with everything. We utilize Azure Logic Apps for all of our computing solutions within our domain, and it has always worked flawlessly. One of the simplest clouds to set up …
Chose Azure Logic Apps
Honestly, both are robust applications that have helped our business. Amazon had more help training and help resources and allowed us to hit the ground running a little easier. However, it seems like Azure is a more complete option that has more overall resources that our …
Chose Azure Logic Apps
When we proposed products for central integration, we were also introduced to software like Pabbly - which was in its early stages of company growth. The main reason why we picked Azure Logic apps over the other software is that it is manufactured by the renowned company …
Chose Azure Logic Apps
They are both good, but for our current moment, having Azure was a better decision. Hubspot has prices in dollar and Brazilian currency is not well at the moment, so we needed to make a decision.
Chose Azure Logic Apps
Azure Logic Apps is being used at the enterprise level. Usage of Azure Logic Apps gels up with an existing ecosystem.
Chose Azure Logic Apps
Like all things, this is very much based on the line of work you are in and the specific business needs. We use Azure for our computing solutions under our domain, and it works great every time! By far one of the easiest clouds to get up and running.
Chose Azure Logic Apps
There are some logic that are too complex to be executed in Azure Logic Apps. It's a smart choice to execute them in Azure Functions. Azure Logic Apps has an OOB connector to connect to Azure functions. The authentication part is taken care of by MSI (so nothing needs to be …
Chose Azure Logic Apps
Microsoft Logic Apps is much more enterprise-ready. With our company being more invested in Microsoft, this was a no brainer for us to leverage the tool. Its ease of use and scalability makes it a good choice for an enterprise workload.
Chose Azure Logic Apps
Azure Logic Apps has its positives and negatives. We have found that solely relying on it it not a best practice. But that Azure Logic Apps shine when used in concert of the other offerings out there as a part of the whole solution. There are tasks that Azure Logic Apps …
Camunda
Chose Camunda
They're just different products with different target audiences. In different ways, IBM and Pega have offerings that are meant to serve processes in a platform-centric approach to their customers. An emphasis on unified development environments, including forms building, …
Chose Camunda
Lacks good documentation. Training and documentation is geared towards those who are already technically adept. Does not have as many data integrations as other full fledged products. Paid version of Camunda is not as fully fledged as other products.
Features
Azure Logic AppsCamunda
Cloud Data Integration
Comparison of Cloud Data Integration features of Product A and Product B
Azure Logic Apps
8.5
Ratings
6% above category average
Camunda
-
Ratings
Pre-built connectors9.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Connector modification9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Support for real-time and batch integration8.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Data quality services8.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Data security features7.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Monitoring console8.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
Azure Logic Apps
-
Ratings
Camunda
9.0
Ratings
38% above category average
API for custom integration00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Azure Logic Apps
-
Ratings
Camunda
8.0
Ratings
1% below category average
Dashboards00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Standard reports00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Custom reports00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Process Engine
Comparison of Process Engine features of Product A and Product B
Azure Logic Apps
-
Ratings
Camunda
8.5
Ratings
17% above category average
Process designer00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Process simulation00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Business rules engine00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
SOA support00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Process player00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Form builder00 Ratings5.00 Ratings
Model execution00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Business Process Automation
Comparison of Business Process Automation features of Product A and Product B
Azure Logic Apps
-
Ratings
Camunda
9.0
Ratings
39% above category average
Business Process Modeling00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Decision Modeling00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Azure Logic AppsCamunda
Small Businesses
Make
Make
Score 8.9 out of 10
CMW Platform
CMW Platform
Score 8.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
IBM App Connect
IBM App Connect
Score 9.5 out of 10
Quixy
Quixy
Score 9.9 out of 10
Enterprises
IBM App Connect
IBM App Connect
Score 9.5 out of 10
Redwood RunMyJobs
Redwood RunMyJobs
Score 9.6 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Azure Logic AppsCamunda
Likelihood to Recommend
8.7
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
7.5
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Azure Logic AppsCamunda
Likelihood to Recommend
1. For simple tasks / moderately difficult tasks (where there are not too many condition checks) 2. We have less time for development, and the Agenda is simple. 3. Avoid Azure Logic Apps when you are unsure about hitting the limits (check latest limitations of Azure Logic Apps in MS docs)
Read full review
Camunda Platform is well suited for scenarios where there are different stages in a business flow and the flow is driven by user action at each stage. For example placing of an order on an ecommerce platform. Depending on whether user was able to make the payment or not the workflow would go to dispatch or retry stage. Now the retry stage would trigger further actions like sending follow up emails etc. Likewise, dispatch stage would have a different set of actions. Since every order is important and we need to know where it stands, using Camunda Platform is imperative. Camunda Platform might not be a right choice where just a one off thing needs to be done. For example, uploading of product information by user or periodic processing of heavy images by a worker. These are all either one step processes or periodic automated processes where we can track the status without using a business modeler like Camunda Platform.
Read full review
Pros
  • We use it for an email connector to a function app and as a way to move items into a storage account.
  • We use it as a way to preprocess information before it goes into function app or a SharePoint site.
Read full review
  • Task orchestration
  • Freeware
  • Graphical interface allows normal users to understand business process model diagrams more intuitively
Read full review
Cons
  • It falls short of alerting capabilities.
  • Microsoft Azure should be unclouded with its pricing. We don't always know how much an inclusion will affect the monthly price. So we have to speculate where we are with the price and if we can afford to include another asset.
Read full review
  • Documentation - It is usually daunting for beginners because of lack of good documentation
  • Simplified setup on local machine for Camunda Server would help developers test changes quickly
  • Easier migration from one deployment version of a Camunda process to another deployment version would help in making changes and deploying them faster.
  • Heap memory management becomes issue at times resulting in stuck processes. This needs to be resolved.
Read full review
Usability
I found them easy to use and adapt to different scenarios, from Azure management to link processes between REST APIs. Together with Function Apps, they're probably the most useful resource type for Azure. Today, I use them in production, and that's a key component: stable, secure, easy to manage, and maintain.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Azure Logic Apps are backed by Azure and Microsoft. There is a wealth of information on the internet about both of these platforms. In addition to this Microsoft has a huge bush to using this platform and have offered many solutions and support options to the user. The only drawback is that it is a fairly new platform so the 3rd party information tends to be lacking.
Read full review
Camunda provides pretty standard product support offerings.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
When we proposed products for central integration, we were also introduced to software like Pabbly - which was in its early stages of company growth. The main reason why we picked Azure Logic apps over the other software is that it is manufactured by the renowned company Microsoft and we had nothing to worry about our data security. Also, Logic apps offered a great deal when it came to pricing and it was also so much easier to negotiate the plans and prices with the customer care representatives at Azure Logic Apps!
Read full review
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Moving to Serverless Computing obviously makes the organization get rid of dependent Infra.
  • ROI can be seen immediately as the required infra can be decommissioned after a successful quarter run.
  • Being deployed as a single entity or single app on Azure Logic Apps, Organizations need to be more careful with controls applied to meet compliance and security posture.
Read full review
  • We've built a good business around developing and deploying Camunda for our clients over the last 7 years.
  • Our clients are finding it a cost-effective way to try before they buy.
  • There's an over-reliance on big offshore outsourcing shops, which hurts ROI and success rates.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Camunda Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of