TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Bitdefender GravityZone vs. Webroot Endpoint Protection

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Bitdefender GravityZone

    Score9.1 out of 10
    N/ABitdefender GravityZone combines multiple security services into a single platform to reduce the cost of building a trusted environment for endpoints.

    $149

    per month 5 devices (minimum)

    Webroot Endpoint Protection

    Score8.2 out of 10
    N/AWebroot Endpoint Protection is the OpenText company's business class multi-vector endpoint protection application, providing centralized endpoint management, deep learning intelligence, and advanced behavioral analytics.

    $150

    per year per 5 seats

    Pricing
    Bitdefender GravityZoneWebroot Endpoint Protection
    Editions & Modules
    GravityZone Small Business Security
    $284.99
    per year 10 devices
    GravityZone Business Security
    $369.99
    per year 10 devices
    GravityZone Business Security Premium
    $814.99
    per year 10 devices
    GravityZone Business Security Premium
    Contact Sales
    GravityZone Business Security Enterprise
    Contact Sales
    GravityZone XDR
    Contact Sales
    Business Endpoint Protection
    $150.00
    per year per 5 seats
    Business Endpoint Protection
    $690.00
    per year per 25 seats
    Business Endpoint Protection
    Contact sales team
    per 50+ seats
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Bitdefender GravityZoneWebroot Endpoint Protection
    Free Trial
    YesYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details5 device license purchase minimum. Discounts available for multi-year subscriptions. 1st year discounts available (up to 30% off displayed price).—
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Bitdefender GravityZoneWebroot Endpoint Protection
    Considered Both Products
    Bitdefender
    Chose Bitdefender GravityZone
    Bitdefender was more of a robust solution than Webroot. It offers many more granular configurations than the competition but also includes more complexity to get it all set up and find how to configure all the additional features.
    Incentivized
    Chose Bitdefender GravityZone
    Very effective and much more wisely implemented security measures.
    Incentivized
    Chose Bitdefender GravityZone
    We switched from WebRoot over 3 years ago. WebRoot was missing a lot of threats due to its design.
    Incentivized
    Chose Bitdefender GravityZone
    We switched from Kaspersky Endpoint Security to BitDefender, due to public perception, monthly pricing model and centralized management across multi-tenant. We then switched from BitDefender to Webroot as this product had the same features as BitDefender as well as better Apple …
    Incentivized
    Chose Bitdefender GravityZone
    Compared to Malwarebytes and Webroot (Endpoint Protection), Bitdefender is far superior. A principal reason for switching was the high detection rate, near 100%, along with heuristics and the ability to neutralise zero-day threats. Previous products we've used fell short of the …
    Incentivized
    Chose Bitdefender GravityZone
    Bitdefender GravityZone was programmed better for the average business owner then Webroot SecureAnywhere. Webroot has a more difficult learning curve, is very technical, and is not as lightweight as Bitdefender GravityZone. The makers of Bitdefender GravityZone seemed to put …
    Incentivized
    Chose Bitdefender GravityZone
    Bitdefender has better results than most of the others. As to why it won against Kaspersky, it is because the dashboard is easier to manage.
    Incentivized
    Webroot, an OpenText company
    Chose Webroot Endpoint Protection
    We chose Webroot Endpoint Protection for its lightweight, cloud-based management and minimal impact on system performance. Compared to other solutions we tested and used, Webroot Endpoint Protection offers quick deployment, strong malware protection, and low overhead, making it …
    Incentivized
    Chose Webroot Endpoint Protection
    Some of the other options available to us were less expensive than Webroot Endpoint Protection. Still, either required too much management on our end didn't offer multi-platform protection or didn't have all of the features we were looking for.
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Features
    Bitdefender GravityZoneWebroot Endpoint Protection
    Endpoint Security
    Comparison of Endpoint Security features of Bitdefender GravityZone and Webroot Endpoint Protection
    Feature
    Bitdefender GravityZone
    9.6
    60 Ratings
    Webroot Endpoint Protection
    7.6
    18 Ratings
    Anti-Exploit Technology9.556 Ratings8.816 Ratings
    Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)10.056 Ratings9.013 Ratings
    Centralized Management9.060 Ratings7.018 Ratings
    Hybrid Deployment Support10.039 Ratings7.111 Ratings
    Infection Remediation9.555 Ratings7.018 Ratings
    Vulnerability Management10.054 Ratings7.015 Ratings
    Malware Detection9.560 Ratings7.018 Ratings
    User Ratings
    Bitdefender GravityZoneWebroot Endpoint Protection
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.5
    (69 ratings)
    7.5
    (23 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    10.0
    (2 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Usability
    9.0
    (4 ratings)
    9.0
    (2 ratings)
    Support Rating
    5.6
    (54 ratings)
    9.5
    (8 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.8
    (7 ratings)