Campaigner vs. Emma by Marigold

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Campaigner
Score 2.0 out of 10
N/A
Campaigner is an email marketing solution built by marketers that is designed to help small, medium and large businesses strengthen customer relationships and drive sales. The vendor's value proposition is that Campaigner provides advanced features such as industry-leading A/B split testing, workflows, API integration, segmentation, detailed reporting, and responsive design, to provide corporate-level senders with the functionality that they need to effectively track and monitor email marketing…N/A
Emma by Marigold
Score 9.4 out of 10
N/A
Emma by Marigold is an email marketing solution. Its key features include mobile-ready design templates, email automation, audience segmentation, and dynamic content. The software includes integration with third-party CRM solutions, ecommerce platforms, and social networks.
$500
per year per user
Pricing
CampaignerEmma by Marigold
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Basic
$500
per year per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
CampaignerEmma by Marigold
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
CampaignerEmma by Marigold
Considered Both Products
Campaigner
Chose Campaigner
Aweber - used this pre 2015. It did not provide a single opt in option. it allowed us to download our contact list into Excel but we could not re-upload any changes we made to cleanup or add to data.

Campaign monitor - we did not like the user interface as well and as I recall …
Chose Campaigner
MailChimp is far more customizable and User-Friendly, although Campaigner gets the job done. Campaigner could benefit from a design upgrade to bring their look into the modern realm. The drag and drop features and email customization of MailChimp, Campaigner is lacking. …
Chose Campaigner
We were using a different client before and the ease of use was just not there. You needed to know a lot of HTML and little tricks to manipulate the system. You don't need all that for Campaigner. The drag and drop function is amazing. It is also easier to pull reports than …
Chose Campaigner
As I have used both I would compare campaigner most closely to MailChimp, both offer an extremely easy to use and quick method of sending out email marketing campaigns and are both cheap. However, with all the simplicity comes the issue of not being robust enough and after …
Emma by Marigold
Chose Emma by Marigold
Emma is a step up from Constant Contact and two steps up from Mailchimp. Emma is affordable and easy to use for all types of companies, but especially for smaller firms and startups. It’s in compliance with SPAM laws, but has an advanced platform to keep your emails from going …
Chose Emma by Marigold
I like Emma much better than MailChimp because of the flexibility and ease of the user interface. I used MailChimp for a previous position and I felt like the home page was definitely more cluttered and it had a clumsier navigation portal. I also think Emma's email design …
Chose Emma by Marigold
Emma had a more robust multi-level account structure which empowered individual locations to participate at the ground-level. Additionally corporate was able to maintain oversight, template creation, marketing automation, and data reporting. The goal is to provide the locations …
Chose Emma by Marigold
I use MailChimp a lot, and while I like it, at the end of the day Emma simply is the most cost-effective. There's not a HUGE learning curve, compared to MailChimp, which is nice, since our non-designers can take a proverbial 'whack' at an email and we can trust that it will get …
Chose Emma by Marigold
We prefer Emma, as it is a much more robust platform offering some of the best functionality and out of the box integrations.
Chose Emma by Marigold
Compared to Act-On, Emma is miles above regarding the ease of use and simplification of complex features. Drip campaigns really are a breeze with Emma's intuitive data. You will experience WYSIWYG glitches due to the nature of the program but Emma offers better templates to …
Chose Emma by Marigold
Emma is a good alternative, but I think mailchimp may be a better and more affordable alternative. Especially since mailchimp is continuously releasing new features and improving their product.
Chose Emma by Marigold
MailChimp seems to offer more customizable options than Emma, but Emma is far less buggy. I used Constant Contact while working with another nonprofit organization and did not anything about it.
Chose Emma by Marigold
We moved away from Constant Contact because of the reputation it was starting to get with not auditing its domain and not providing us with the best possible brand reputation and also because we just didn't get the analytics we wanted to improve our process. With Emma, we can …
Chose Emma by Marigold
Emma is the easiest to use platform I've tried so far. It was easy to setup and send the first enewsletter. The functionality is very user friendly and it "makes sense" as you go through to add content and users. It's made being a marketing team of one very efficient.
Chose Emma by Marigold
Mail Chimp: the price was better, but the platform was not predictable. You did not get the same support with mailchimp.
Constant Contact: This is an outdated system that does not make it easy to design modern, clean emails and I consider it a dinosaur.
Chose Emma by Marigold
Mailchimp is the global choice for our university and there is a pricing structure in place.
Chose Emma by Marigold
Emma was the perfect solution for what we were looking for due to its easy to use interface, relatively low cost and basic functionality. We were not looking for expensive, complex tools to send out multiple campaigns with various controls and tests. We also were impressed with …
Chose Emma by Marigold
At the time we made the decision to move to Emma, my organization was using both MailChimp and Constant Contact. Emma's drag-and-drop template editor surpassed both, and even editing the pre-made template HTML in Emma was easier. List management was much smoother than the …
Chose Emma by Marigold
We moved from Emma to SendGrid. The deliverability of Emma is lower than Sendgrid and the overall functionality of Sendgrid feels more fit for a digital marketing agency. The number and design of the Emma templates far surpasses that of Sendgrid though. Emma is much more suited …
Chose Emma by Marigold
I think that Emma is more user-friendly.
Chose Emma by Marigold
None of those platform were good for an agency and their clients. Managing multiple email clients in one system isn't something you find everywhere. It's also not easy to pay for the other platforms since they are built for the enterprise and not SMB.
Chose Emma by Marigold
Our internal competitors are the individual email platforms our stores have signed up for. In general, they need to take our HTML and upload it themselves, making Constant Contact and MailChimp very cumbersome. Emma, on the other hand, allows us to take charge of that. Users …
Chose Emma by Marigold
Very similar to MailChimp. More user-friendly than Constant Contact but fewer ways to customize formatting.
Chose Emma by Marigold
We chose Emma in addition to Sendgrid to protect the integrity of our transactional email deliverability. Emma's delivery rates were good. We later found Mailchimp a bit cheaper and easier to work with in our specific use case but I still think it's worth testing Emma if you're …
Chose Emma by Marigold
MUCH more straightforward and usable, PeopleVine requires someone with a lot more coding knowledge to do simple things like change a font color or hyperlink text and is better used by an agency with extensive access to those experts whereas Emma can be taught to just about …
Chose Emma by Marigold
Emma is night and day difference from Constant Contact in terms of customer support, feature set, and usability. It is so much better and more affordable. Emma is a step down in feature set and functionality from Pardot, Marketo, or Hubspot, but if you are a company that is not …
Chose Emma by Marigold
I was not with the company when Emma was selected. In my personal experience, I preferred HubSpot.
Features
CampaignerEmma by Marigold
Email & Online Marketing
Comparison of Email & Online Marketing features of Product A and Product B
Campaigner
6.3
Ratings
23% below category average
Emma by Marigold
9.1
Ratings
14% above category average
WYSIWYG email editor8.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Dynamic content4.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Ability to test dynamic content4.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Landing pages8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
A/B testing3.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Mobile optimization7.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Email deliverability reporting6.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
List management8.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Triggered drip sequences9.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Campaigner
4.7
Ratings
48% below category average
Emma by Marigold
10.0
Ratings
26% above category average
Dashboards5.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Standard reports8.00 Ratings9.90 Ratings
Custom reports1.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
CampaignerEmma by Marigold
Small Businesses
Mad Mimi
Mad Mimi
Score 10.0 out of 10
Mad Mimi
Mad Mimi
Score 10.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
VerticalResponse
VerticalResponse
Score 10.0 out of 10
VerticalResponse
VerticalResponse
Score 10.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Emma by Marigold
Emma by Marigold
Score 9.4 out of 10
Iterable
Iterable
Score 8.7 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
CampaignerEmma by Marigold
Likelihood to Recommend
2.0
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.0
(0 ratings)
9.5
(0 ratings)
Usability
5.0
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
1.0
(0 ratings)
2.0
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
CampaignerEmma by Marigold
Likelihood to Recommend
If you are a small business who just wants a passable service, this tool will suit you. It does have WYSIWYG tools to create emails and test sends are easy. It does a decent job of reporting too. If, however you are a larger company, I suggest you look elsewhere. There are plenty of other solutions that do this better (I liked My Emma from a previous position where we were doing small to medium sends) for less money and will actually provide decent customer service if you contact them
Read full review
Using Emma for weekly templated email use with minimal changes is awesome. If you want you can create a master and make minor graphic edits quickly and easily from your smartphone. Any edit is possible as long as the artwork is on the online server. Only time I hit a bump in the road is when I was asked to change the style sheet and did not know that the pricing plan I was on did not include this feature. Client had to wait to send new format until Emma performed the requested changes.
Read full review
Pros
  • Email Customization
  • Contact Management
  • Form
  • Workflow Processes
Read full review
  • Drag and Drop Interface - I love the drag-and-drop interface used to design campaigns. It makes it easy for creative types to get the look they want, and it helps less technically and aesthetically adept users to create campaigns that still look great. After using both Constant Contact and Mailchimp, I think Emma comes out on top in terms of ease of template design.
  • Master Admin Account - Having a master admin account controlled by one person allows us to deploy brand assets to each sub-account, and we're also able to push out templates for users who aren't ready or don't have the time to design their own.
  • Dynamic Content - Dynamic content has proven so useful to us, especially in our Admissions Office. Making it possible for regular users to easily create emails using dynamic content is a VERY strong feature that, in my experience, is unique to Emma.
  • Great Tutorials - Emma does a great job taking care of its users. The support folks are always kind and helpful, but Emma publishes an array of tutorials and resources to help with just about anything its users encounter, from how to use custom merge fields to advice on creating the best campaigns.
Read full review
Cons
  • Campaigner is just too bare-bones. When we first started using Campaigner close to a decade ago it was perfect for what it was. But nowadays Campaigner is missing several features that their competitors offer like exit intent and cart abandonment emails.
  • Campaigner has an astonishingly bad unsubscribe option. We have had many customers complain to us over the years that when they try to unsubscribe through the emails Campaigner sends, their unsubscribe does not go through.
  • Hard to change account settings such as changing our subscription plan. We had to call and were told to wait 24 hours just to make a small change to our account.
Read full review
  • Setup of users - We used to be able to setup a user and send them our own welcome email. Emma has since set up the ability to add users where they send the welcome email. It's a great new feature, but it doesn't always work. We've had some users who never receive these emails and then we need to reach out to support anyway.
  • The code to set up a configurable email is cumbersome. It's great that it is so customizable, but there is a learning curve.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
I can't see us not renewing unless we find something better. This is highly unlikely because there was a thorough research done for use to chose the best marketing client and it always came back to campaigner.
Read full review
Easy to use and gets the job done without too many "extras" (ex. we didn't need a full marketing automation platform so Emma had what we needed to send email marketing communications without having to pay for the stuff we didn't need)
Read full review
Usability
Great features but awful tech support experiences over five years of use. Some releases broke our workflows and Campaigner could never explain why. Our initial plan provided a designed client support contact. This individual changed frequently without notice and at one point they decided our plan no longer included a designated contact. Of course this was never communicated to us until we tried to reach out to the person. If you are tech savy this system might be for you but you'll be on your own.
Read full review
While every WYSIWYG software will experience glitches, Emma handles them well. Keep in mind they rarely happen, but they do, it can be of annoyance. Regardless, Emma allows my organization to create seamless email campaigns using fresh data. Emma makes coming up with strategic decisions very easy. The list segmentation that Emma feature allows us to easily manage a large list without issues. Overall, Emma is extremely usable with nearly no learning curve!
Read full review
Support Rating
Over five years I rarely had an interaction I was satisfied with. General tech support staff did not seem to be trained on anything but the basics of the system. They would open tech support tickets, give me a case # and then we would hear nothing. We still have open tickets from years ago. Software releases were never communicated. New features never announced. For an email marketing company they did not use email to communicate to me well at all. Every email I received was trying to sell me what I had already bought
Read full review
I hate that to get support I have to submit a question to a public forum and wait for a response. I just want the ability for a quick live chat to answer my simple help questions quickly or at the very least submit a ticket via email and get a status update.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Aweber - used this pre 2015. It did not provide a single opt in option. it allowed us to download our contact list into Excel but we could not re-upload any changes we made to cleanup or add to data. Campaign monitor - we did not like the user interface as well and as I recall it did not have a similar workflow feature.
Read full review
Emma had a more robust multi-level account structure which empowered individual locations to participate at the ground-level. Additionally corporate was able to maintain oversight, template creation, marketing automation, and data reporting. The goal is to provide the locations with the ability to send their own marketing messages, saving corporate marketing time, and providing more genuine, locally-focused email campaigns. Emma was very effective at making that happen.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Campaigner has cost us valuable time in the times that customers had complained to us that their unsubscribe emails did not go through and we had to manually go into campaigners website and manually remove those emails.
  • Campaigner has offered an easy way for us to send marketing emails for quick and effective usage.
Read full review
  • It's been pretty overwhelmingly positive. Our clients are happy about the savings that we're able to pass onto them.
  • We're able to better determine what headlines receive the most clicks from our client's emails based on the dashboard.
  • Super easy email designer that frees up some of our graphic designers to take on other jobs.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Emma by Marigold Screenshots

Screenshot of dynamic content used to send unique, personalized content to each subscriber based on the data stored about them from a single email.Screenshot of the editor's drag & drop layouts and inline text editing, that help to keep the creative process fast and flexible.Screenshot of a display of account activity, email performance and recent mailings in one place right after login.Screenshot of insights on the go using Metric, the included iPhone and Android app.Screenshot of response results that give insights into what's working and provide next steps.Screenshot of customizable, mobile-optimized templates to show off a brand and content in the template gallery.