Camunda vs. Okta Workflows

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Camunda
Score 7.9 out of 10
N/A
Camunda is a process orchestration tool designed to help organizations design, automate, and improve any process. Built for business and IT collaboration using BPMN and DMN standards, Camunda aims to enable seamless integration across endpoints to transform mission-critical processes.N/A
Okta Workflows
Score 8.7 out of 10
N/A
Azuqua was a tool that helped users integrate their SaaS applications and build custom automations. It was acquired by Okta in late 2019, and is now part of Okta Workflows. Okta Workflows leverages Azuqua’s workflow orchestration engine and application integrations to automate complex identity-centric processes such as user onboarding and offboarding. The product is available as part of the Okta Lifecycle Management…N/A
Pricing
CamundaOkta Workflows
Editions & Modules
Self-Managed Enterprise
Contact Sales
per year
SaaS Enterprise
Contact Sales
per year
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
CamundaOkta Workflows
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
CamundaOkta Workflows
Considered Both Products
Camunda
Chose Camunda
They're just different products with different target audiences. In different ways, IBM and Pega have offerings that are meant to serve processes in a platform-centric approach to their customers. An emphasis on unified development environments, including forms building, …
Chose Camunda
Lacks good documentation. Training and documentation is geared towards those who are already technically adept. Does not have as many data integrations as other full fledged products. Paid version of Camunda is not as fully fledged as other products.
Okta Workflows
Chose Okta Workflows
I think Okta is so much more complete and FUB is more only sales oriented instead of Customer Service, with Okta you can call, chat, get in contact internally with other departments, and do different things to solve customer issue.
Chose Okta Workflows
We have not used other products similar to Okta.
Chose Okta Workflows
I evaluated Zapier and Microsoft Flow before coming across Azuqua. Zapier was too simplistic and didn't allow for transfer of enough variables. The price point also didn't work for the value it could provide. Microsoft Flow couldn't make the connection with Smartsheet, and I …
Chose Okta Workflows
Stampley - on the surface they look similar, but I came across this alternative after integrating with Azuqua so I haven't fully evaluated it against Azuqua.
Chose Okta Workflows
None, Azuqua seemed to do what we needed.
Chose Okta Workflows
Azuqua handles multi-stream processes very well, however provides some nuances with connecting data.
Chose Okta Workflows
Zapier primarily, I prefer the workflow creation in Azuqua. The UI is very user friendly.
Chose Okta Workflows
I have used Mulesoft, Workato, my own code and in past years heavyweight data (e.g. ETL) platforms along with a number of bus technologies. In this case, I was looking for the cloud-based approach that matches our strategy of being totally cloud-focused along with simpler …
Chose Okta Workflows
Azuqua was the first application we assessed for our purposes, and served our needs so well that we felt no need to search further. It gave us the solutions we needed in a way that was easy to set up and maintain, and the support we received was above and beyond expectations, …
Chose Okta Workflows
I had to use the Automate tool for funneling image assets in bulk (tens of thousands) from FTPs into various destinations on an eCommerce platform. The user interface was quite harsh in comparison to Azuqua. Far more text/code line driven.
Chose Okta Workflows
Azuqua offered the most customization of the other platforms we tried. While it was comparably intuitive to use, in terms of entry level, Azuqua maintained this intuitiveness at higher levels of sophistication/integration whereas the other platforms either lacked the same logic …
Chose Okta Workflows
Azuqua was more intuitive.
Chose Okta Workflows
IFTTT / Zapier - There really isn't a comparison as Azuqua allows for full customization of your flows and IFTTT and Zapier do not.

Talend Open Studio is built more for doing database / file integrations and it can do API calls. Talend is much bigger but cannot accomplish what …
Chose Okta Workflows
We have not used another tool besides Azuqua to help us solve these business needs.
Chose Okta Workflows
Smartsheet notifications is the main competitor for what we use Azuqua for. When we got Azuqua, there was no competitor and Smartsheet actually recommended it as the solution. Now, we split up the work between the 2 tools and use Smartsheet for the easier notifications and …
Chose Okta Workflows
Easy to build out complex if/then scenarios and fire of multiple other workflows within one workflow. Like the UI of seeing how data is being utilizes, ported, and manipulated across the workflows. Also like the workflow history for optimization as well as troubleshooting. Raw …
Chose Okta Workflows
I evaluated another platform, but I can't recall their name.

ServiceRocket didn't work. I tried to integrate with them, but it was a mess and a waste of time. The other platform was 10x as expensive at Azuqua.
Chose Okta Workflows
Azuqua was the only product we looked at in this space.
Features
CamundaOkta Workflows
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
Camunda
9.0
Ratings
38% above category average
Okta Workflows
-
Ratings
API for custom integration9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Camunda
8.0
Ratings
1% below category average
Okta Workflows
-
Ratings
Dashboards8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Standard reports7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Custom reports9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Process Engine
Comparison of Process Engine features of Product A and Product B
Camunda
8.5
Ratings
17% above category average
Okta Workflows
-
Ratings
Process designer9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Process simulation9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Business rules engine7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
SOA support9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Process player9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Form builder5.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Model execution10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Business Process Automation
Comparison of Business Process Automation features of Product A and Product B
Camunda
9.0
Ratings
39% above category average
Okta Workflows
-
Ratings
Business Process Modeling9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Decision Modeling9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
CamundaOkta Workflows
Small Businesses
CMW Platform
CMW Platform
Score 8.9 out of 10
CMW Platform
CMW Platform
Score 8.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Quixy
Quixy
Score 9.9 out of 10
Quixy
Quixy
Score 9.9 out of 10
Enterprises
Redwood RunMyJobs
Redwood RunMyJobs
Score 9.6 out of 10
Redwood RunMyJobs
Redwood RunMyJobs
Score 9.6 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
CamundaOkta Workflows
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
CamundaOkta Workflows
Likelihood to Recommend
Camunda Platform is well suited for scenarios where there are different stages in a business flow and the flow is driven by user action at each stage. For example placing of an order on an ecommerce platform. Depending on whether user was able to make the payment or not the workflow would go to dispatch or retry stage. Now the retry stage would trigger further actions like sending follow up emails etc. Likewise, dispatch stage would have a different set of actions. Since every order is important and we need to know where it stands, using Camunda Platform is imperative. Camunda Platform might not be a right choice where just a one off thing needs to be done. For example, uploading of product information by user or periodic processing of heavy images by a worker. These are all either one step processes or periodic automated processes where we can track the status without using a business modeler like Camunda Platform.
Read full review
The integration I used Azuqua for was based on Salesforce, Wrike and Office 365. I found the integration of Salesforce reasonably straightforward, Wrike was limited in the "cards" capability but functional (there are bugs but there are also workarounds but they required assistance from the Azuqua support team) and Office 365 was quite immature (primarily around Excel bugs but also email was limited).
Read full review
Pros
  • Task orchestration
  • Freeware
  • Graphical interface allows normal users to understand business process model diagrams more intuitively
Read full review
  • The best part about Azuqua is that you do not need to write code. You do however need to have an understanding of logic and how the software works. This happens to fit me perfectly as someone with basic programming experience.
  • Their Support is second to none. Not only are they extremely quick and responsive, but their answers are never canned responses and always provide valuable content.
  • They seem to take feedback seriously and will continue to evolve and make a better product.
Read full review
Cons
  • Documentation - It is usually daunting for beginners because of lack of good documentation
  • Simplified setup on local machine for Camunda Server would help developers test changes quickly
  • Easier migration from one deployment version of a Camunda process to another deployment version would help in making changes and deploying them faster.
  • Heap memory management becomes issue at times resulting in stuck processes. This needs to be resolved.
Read full review
  • I think it requires an easy way to migrate flows created from one user to then move the ownership to another user. It happened to us that one of our engineers left the company and he had the Azuqua account and flows. It required quite some time, cases and telephone calls to do the migration to my account.
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
The system is working as it should, keeping our programs safe from outside hackers. Helping us keep our passwords safe, convenient and already ready to get us logged into the program securely and quickly. Verification that only authorized users are able to access our company's programs. Okta Workflows (Azuqua) is a very good system that has helped our company greatly.
Read full review
Support Rating
Camunda provides pretty standard product support offerings.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Read full review
I evaluated Zapier and Microsoft Flow before coming across Azuqua. Zapier was too simplistic and didn't allow for transfer of enough variables. The price point also didn't work for the value it could provide. Microsoft Flow couldn't make the connection with Smartsheet, and I was unable to get Microsoft support or Smartsheet support to assist me with the issue.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • We've built a good business around developing and deploying Camunda for our clients over the last 7 years.
  • Our clients are finding it a cost-effective way to try before they buy.
  • There's an over-reliance on big offshore outsourcing shops, which hurts ROI and success rates.
Read full review
  • Increased time savings. We could not function as a matter of daily business if we did not have a tool to automate project folders (and complementary workflow management profiles) for the thousands of projects that flow through daily.
  • Opens up a greater understanding of all the silos and divisions within the company infrastructure and tests secure means to link those groups safely and share information.
  • Opens up the chance to communicate with other API information sources if our company is doing a partnership with another organization. Granted everything is square with IT security.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Camunda Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of