TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Contact about Miro

Please fill out the form below to get in touch.

Miro

Connect with Miro

What are you interested in?

Already have an account?

You hereby consent to have TrustRadius share the information supplied on this form with Miro so that Miro and TrustRadius may contact you in regard to the information requested.

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Conceptboard

    Score8 out of 10
    N/AConceptboard is a collaboration software built for teams of any size. Its primary features are project management, team whiteboards, integration into business workflows, and real-time collaboration.N/A

    Miro

    Score9.2 out of 10
    N/AMiro empowers cross-functional teams to flow from early discovery through final delivery on a shared, AI-first canvas. With the canvas as the prompt, Miro’s AI capabilities keep teams in the flow of work, and scale shifts in ways of working.

    $10

    per month per user

    Pricing
    ConceptboardMiro
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    1. Free - To discover what Miro can do. Always free
    $0
    2. Starter - Unlimited and private boards with essential features
    $8
    per month (billed annually) per user
    3. Business - Scales collaboration with advanced features and security
    $16
    per month (billed annually) per user
    4. Enterprise - For work across the entire organization, with support, security and control, to scale
    contact sales
    annual billing per user
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    ConceptboardMiro
    Free Trial
    NoYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoYes
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
    Additional Details—Monthly billing also available at $10 per month for the Starter plan, or $20 for the Business plan.
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    ConceptboardMiro
    Considered Both Products
    Conceptboard
    Chose Conceptboard
    I like ConceptBoard better than Miro. Miro also offers a similar virtual "whiteboard" but Conceptboard has a better UX and is easier (and more fun) to use.

    I've used Figma extensively, and still do, for UX planning and design but have moved away from them for brainstorming. Figma…
    Incentivized
    Chose Conceptboard
    Conceptboard provides an easy whiteboard with multi-functions, that aren't lagging while more people are working on it and that is easy to self-explain, while I faced lagging while using Miro. Conceptboard is just easy compatible in any business situation (in-office, Zoom …
    Incentivized
    Chose Conceptboard
    Miro is a superior product with more capabilities and better suited for advanced users. We selected Conceptboard as a short-term solution that was low-cost compared to Miro but allowed users to create boards. Once users are versed in Conceptboard, they are better off using Miro …
    Incentivized
    Chose Conceptboard
    Conceptboard has a very simple interface design. and stands out with a successful UX/UI design. can offer a rapid adaptation process for volatile employees and customers. While it has many features compared to its competitors, its interface is not complicated. However, some of …
    Incentivized
    Chose Conceptboard
    ConceptBoard is a very solid solution that has been around since a long time. It allows to handle easily collaborative workshops and design sessions.
    Incentivized
    Chose Conceptboard
    Conceptboard does not lag as compared to its other competitors. It is fast and easy to use and is very much considerable from the pricing point of view as well because of low cost monthly plans. It is simple and right on point with the latest updated tools which is what makes …
    Incentivized
    Chose Conceptboard
    Initially, we selected Conceptboard due to its quick TAT with respect to integration and implementation. Also, it is a quite cheaper option as compared to its direct competitors. The main reason to select Conceptboard was - 1. The infinite canvas really helped with longer …
    Incentivized
    Chose Conceptboard
    Conceptboard's user interface is a lot more intuitive, flexible, and easy to use. Real-time monitoring down to cursor movements is also something that Conceptboard has an edge on, as well as allowing for file attachments to which you can annotate or comment directly on the …
    Incentivized
    Miro
    Chose Miro
    We assessed these tools to gain a better understanding because they are excellent and have certain unique features. But in the end, we chose Miro since it offers all the features that ClickUp, Stormboard, and Conceptboard do. Additionally, it has a special feature that lets you …
    Incentivized
    Chose Miro
    at first Miro didn't send notification emails on every little change or comment, the way that Conceptboard did. however, i do find Miro to be user friendly like Conceptboard was. I would say that "follow all threads" on Miro should automatically be on for any board that you're …
    Incentivized
    Chose Miro
    Miro has many more features and tools than Conceptboard and Mural, and it is also more pleasant to use. Now, when I have to compare it to Freehand, it becomes a bit more difficult to find significant differences. Miro wins in having more templates, but Freehand had better …
    Incentivized
    Chose Miro
    Microsoft Whiteboard and Conceptboard were tested a couple of time, but didn't compare to Miro's speed, number of features and usability. Mural offers quite a similar set of features, having a slight advantage in the past - that gap has now been closed by introducing private …
    Incentivized
    Chose Miro
    Conceptboard: While useful for simple collaboration, it lacks the depth of features and polish Miro offers, especially for large, complex projects and advanced templates.
    Mural: Similar to Miro in many ways, but Miro feels more intuitive, has better integrations, and a wider …
    Incentivized
    Chose Miro
    We are currently using Conceptboard as our primary board platform. It can be confusing with so many different platforms and for the team to know where things are saved and documented. We still want to keep copies or final versions of our documents on our own servers.
    Incentivized
    Chose Miro
    I first use the whiteboard program Conceptboard for teaching design classes. The program was recommended to me by a German colleague during my first quarter of online instruction. After piloting Conceptboard in three classes (freshman, sophomore, and senior level), I decided to …
    Incentivized
    Chose Miro
    Video tools, presentation, and timers.
    Incentivized
    Chose Miro
    - notifications through slack
    - almost never down unlike CB
    Incentivized
    Chose Miro
    FAR superior - more user friendly and has advanced tools
    Incentivized
    Chose Miro
    Miro has more flexibity and better usability
    Incentivized
    Chose Miro
    Until recently Miro has handled multiple PDF imports much faster and more efficiently than other platforms. There are also much more opportunities for embedding links and organising content on the boards. Structuring Miro boards is somewhat easier than other platforms and the …
    Incentivized
    Chose Miro
    Miro has practical features that make it more dependable than its competitors.
    Incentivized
    Chose Miro
    Best one - only lacking good wireframing possibilities
    Incentivized
    Chose Miro
    The presentation and drawing tools were better. Easy to share links with people outside our team.
    Incentivized
    Chose Miro
    Concept board is much more accepted in Europe which jeopardizes our use of Miro.
    Incentivized
    Chose Miro
    At the beginning of the pandemic, we had to quickly find a remote alternative to face-to-face workshops, especially for our agile teams. Due to the feature set, Miro and Mural quickly became the clear favorites. In retrospect, I can no longer say what ultimately tipped the …
    Incentivized
    Chose Miro
    Much easier to use, slicker, and much more features and options to work with. Easier to export/import frames and boards, which makes sit easier to use and collaborate on a daily basis.
    Incentivized
    Chose Miro
    Miro became the industry standard.

    MURAL is too specific and limited to ideation process support. Miro is definitely more flexible and supports a broader set of use-cases.
    Incentivized
    Chose Miro
    Miro offers more features that help me improve the user experience for remote trainings.
    I perceive a faster speed of delivery of new features or improvement of existing ones.
    Incentivized
    Chose Miro
    Miro is on top together with ClickUp for me personally. If miro would have kind of product management tools
    Incentivized
    Chose Miro
    Miro is light years ahead of the competitors, in almost all of the categories. It is effective, attractive, and easy to use. It does the very thing it sets out to do. Provide purposeful collaboration.
    Incentivized
    Chose Miro
    Miro has single sign in.
    Miro has much more integrations into emojis, stickers, image search etc which was way more powerful than competitors.
    Miro navigation is a bit less user friendly initially but you get used to it.
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    User Ratings
    ConceptboardMiro
    Likelihood to Recommend
    2.6
    (21 ratings)
    9.2
    (5571 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.5
    (149 ratings)
    Usability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.1
    (104 ratings)
    Availability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.8
    (16 ratings)
    Performance
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (15 ratings)
    Support Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.5
    (46 ratings)
    Online Training
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (4 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.1
    (3586 ratings)
    Configurability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.9
    (9 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.2
    (3934 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.2
    (15 ratings)
    Vendor post-sale
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.2
    (5 ratings)
    Vendor pre-sale
    -
    (0 ratings)
    5.8
    (5 ratings)