Conga CPQ empowers sales, partners, and customers to efficiently configure complex products and services offerings, and provide personalized prices and quotes, utilizing codified product and pricing information - to drive higher win rates and a more pleasurable buying experience. Conga CPQ also helps to maintain a single price book, discounting structure, and quoting structure across all channels. With an API-first approach, configuration, pricing, or quoting capabilities that can…
N/A
Outlaw
Score 8.9 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
Outlaw’s contract automation platform adapts to the user's needs for rapid adoption. Outlaw boasts flexible, simple pricing in order to make it affordable for all team sizes (no maint. fees, unlimited storage & eSignatures). The platform unifies contract generation, document automation, in-app collaboration & negotiations, and a repository into a single user experience. Whether starting from self-serve templates or 3rd party/customer agreements or legacy contracts, the vendor boasts…
N/A
Pricing
Conga CPQ
Outlaw
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Conga CPQ
Outlaw
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
Optional
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
Out modular unified platform is built to easily adapt to your organization and unique contracting processes. Work with us to establish a plan that meets the specific needs of your team. Schedule a time with our experts here: https://getoutlaw.com/request-demo/
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Conga CPQ
Outlaw
Considered Both Products
Conga CPQ
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose Conga CPQ
Our other option was Oracle EBS and we went w/conga due to price and SF integration
Conga CPQ processes are more streamlined and easy to use and install. well structured study material and easy to follow instructions makes it even greater
The understanding and building of products is very easy compared to Salasforce CPQ. The Quoting process is much faster and easier. The functionalities provides for rules are much more compared to Salesforce CPQ. User friendly layouts is one of the best things about Conga CPQ. …
We use Conga CLM in conjunction with Conga CPQ to manage legal processes alongside quoting. It's how legal teams get looped into the sales cycle and assist in closing deals.
It has been too long for me to remember all the various CPQ products we evaluated. But our short list came down to Salesforce CPQ and and Conga CPQ. At the time, we considered them both pretty close to equivalent solutions for meeting our needs, so negotiation mainly came …
many similar features are there between the CPQ tools, but there are also features that are available in previous CPQ tool is missing in Conga CPQ, need improvisation.
Conga CPQ is better from the competition as it provides a good UI for the users to interact with which includes a lot of configuration items like attributes, options, bundles and standalones. Attribute based pricing is easy to setup and can be configured for price lists very …
Outlaw allows us to store templates, easy to use and edit, collaborate internally and externally, and send right from Outlaw in a simple, easy, platform. I think there is still improvements needed - search function, address book, are the two main ones that would make this a …
The main reason we chose Outlaw was the price and customer service. The customer service at Outlaw has been outstanding in helping us learn the process and set up contracts. They are available all the time and respond very quickly. Julie Appel is the best at Outlaw!
Much more reasonable pricing for what we were looking for. I loved the willingness to work with us on pieces of software that were not even developed with Outlaw yet.
Outlaw is much easier to load and format a contract template. Easier to send. Better UI. Just easier to use all around in my opinion. All of our clients had never used it before but asked what it was called and how they can explore it for their business which is a big win!
Conga CPQ is flexible in the price setup. We achieve a lot of customized pricing setups using CPQ. Usage flowing into billing works well also. The Conga cart is a huge painpoint for us. We bill each route and trip we run individually so we have a very large amount of manual, complex cart configuration.
Well suited to template led document creation - where multiple non legal users can create contracts that are locked down and secure from error. Because it is a niche platform it can be tough to persuade users outside our business to use collaboration features. Often we have to export and revert to using MS word for red-lining/track changes.
Fully integrated with Salesforce.com. Allows for the seamless update of all objects on the SFDC platform. As primary quotes are updated, so to are the opportunities.
Supports integration with Avalara for Sales Tax and Docusign for E-Signature.
Supports the quoting of product that requires customization that results in a dynamic cost, MSRP and customer price.
Significant amount of R&D is being invested in to the platform. Many of the items on our wish list have already been incorporated as a standard feature or on the near term roadmap.
The GUI design of Apttus is configurable but prescriptive. If you want a very specific look and feel, it will take some effort to do so. There have been some modern design updates recently using AngularJS. Check it out to see if it works for you.
It is a stable repository management tool but needs to upgrade its search engine to make it more efficient and user friendly. There can be an advanced search option which allows me to find agreements based on Contract numbers, Company name and Agreement Type as well as by affiliates
Conga CPQ is a great tool but lacks good support and [a] very limited knowledge base which doesn't include day to day errors which users face, thus leading us to support and take more time in turn. Also cart performance can be improved drastically which will enhance the user experience as the user doesn't have to wait for the pricing.
Great user interface and great training and support by the Outlaw team. Whenever we had a question, they were always available to help. Loading templates made the contract process so much quicker and required less approval's from our leadership team, which makes it easier for everyone to do their jobs
We had to use an outside vendor to implement the software and we paid them for a while during the initial choppy months. I was learning as I went along and then we could occasionally reach out to Salesforce if we really needed to. I think the support is there, but you obviously have to pay for it if the admin team doesn't have enough experience.
The support has been A+. Outlaw is always there when I'm having issues or need assistance. They will get back to me the same day or next. The support team is very knowledgeable and explains it very simplified for us. Julie Appel with Outlaw has been the perfect support for my company in rolling out Outlaw and answering any questions we have.
You need to have IT involved. The implementation partner downplayed the role that IT would have to play. We needed data migration, user set-up, customizations within Apttus for legacy migrations. Luckily we had a developer on our staff for Salesforce.com.
It has been too long for me to remember all the various CPQ products we evaluated. But our short list came down to Salesforce CPQ and and Conga CPQ. At the time, we considered them both pretty close to equivalent solutions for meeting our needs, so negotiation mainly came down to price of the solution, and estimates to implement. Now that we are migrating to Lightning, the balance has tipped very strongly in Salesforce CPQ's favour.
The main reason we chose Outlaw was the price and customer service. The customer service at Outlaw has been outstanding in helping us learn the process and set up contracts. They are available all the time and respond very quickly. Julie Appel is the best at Outlaw!
It cost the company almost $1million in 3 years of licensing. It then cost us the business to implement it in 2.5 years over $5 million dollars internally with resourcing involved to roll out globally. There was no ROI, that was just to implement it as the business continues to not adopt the product.
The adoption level of the product is ~25% of the business actually using the product.
Business areas ended up hiring and spending something near $150k/year in human resources to use the system for the sales team because of the low adoption.