Conga CPQ empowers sales, partners, and customers to efficiently configure complex products and services offerings, and provide personalized prices and quotes, utilizing codified product and pricing information - to drive higher win rates and a more pleasurable buying experience. Conga CPQ also helps to maintain a single price book, discounting structure, and quoting structure across all channels. With an API-first approach, configuration, pricing, or quoting capabilities that can…
N/A
Qwilr
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
Qwilr is designed to change the way a business creates and shares documents on the web. This solution allows businesses to turn traditional documents into powerful and interactive webpages that look great on any device. The vendor says this in turn offers businesses access to analytics and other helpful tools when sharing quotes, proposals and presentations with clients.
$39
per month per user
Pricing
Conga CPQ
Qwilr
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Business
$39
per month per user
Enterprise
$590
per month 10 users
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Conga CPQ
Qwilr
Free Trial
No
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
Optional
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
Qwilr is a freemium product. Users upgrade to the Business or Enterprise plans for access to premium features, like advanced analytics, security and branding controls, get sales material accepted, e-signed and collect payments via Stripe.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Conga CPQ
Qwilr
Features
Conga CPQ
Qwilr
CPQ
Comparison of CPQ features of Product A and Product B
Conga CPQ
8.5
Ratings
2% below category average
Qwilr
-
Ratings
Quote sharing/sending
8.80 Ratings
00 Ratings
Product configuration
8.60 Ratings
00 Ratings
Configuration options
8.60 Ratings
00 Ratings
Pricing rules
8.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Price adjustment
8.10 Ratings
00 Ratings
Purchase history and open contracts
8.40 Ratings
00 Ratings
Guided selling/Sales portal
8.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
CPQ reporting & analytics
7.10 Ratings
00 Ratings
CPQ-CRM integration
9.30 Ratings
00 Ratings
Attachments to quotes
9.40 Ratings
00 Ratings
Order capturing
8.70 Ratings
00 Ratings
Proposal Creation & Organization
Comparison of Proposal Creation & Organization features of Product A and Product B
Conga CPQ
-
Ratings
Qwilr
8.4
Ratings
5% above category average
Proposal branding
00 Ratings
8.40 Ratings
Proposal templates
00 Ratings
8.30 Ratings
Proposal content library updates
00 Ratings
8.50 Ratings
Guided proposal creation
00 Ratings
8.40 Ratings
Searchable proposal database
00 Ratings
8.50 Ratings
Proposal Collaboration & Workflow
Comparison of Proposal Collaboration & Workflow features of Product A and Product B
Conga CPQ
-
Ratings
Qwilr
8.6
Ratings
6% above category average
RFP management & response
00 Ratings
8.40 Ratings
Proposal collaboration & approval
00 Ratings
8.40 Ratings
User permissions/proposal editing controls
00 Ratings
8.00 Ratings
Sales proposal workflow
00 Ratings
9.40 Ratings
Proposal automation user interface
00 Ratings
8.80 Ratings
Proposal Delivery
Comparison of Proposal Delivery features of Product A and Product B
Conga CPQ is flexible in the price setup. We achieve a lot of customized pricing setups using CPQ. Usage flowing into billing works well also. The Conga cart is a huge painpoint for us. We bill each route and trip we run individually so we have a very large amount of manual, complex cart configuration.
It is great for presentations to customers and keeping them engaged in your presentation. Although it is great for creating a highly customizable presentation, some users may want even more control over font, font size and font color. Some of my colleagues have expressed some dissatisfaction with the formatting as well as saving any formatting changes that have made.
Fully integrated with Salesforce.com. Allows for the seamless update of all objects on the SFDC platform. As primary quotes are updated, so to are the opportunities.
Supports integration with Avalara for Sales Tax and Docusign for E-Signature.
Supports the quoting of product that requires customization that results in a dynamic cost, MSRP and customer price.
Significant amount of R&D is being invested in to the platform. Many of the items on our wish list have already been incorporated as a standard feature or on the near term roadmap.
The GUI design of Apttus is configurable but prescriptive. If you want a very specific look and feel, it will take some effort to do so. There have been some modern design updates recently using AngularJS. Check it out to see if it works for you.
It is a stable repository management tool but needs to upgrade its search engine to make it more efficient and user friendly. There can be an advanced search option which allows me to find agreements based on Contract numbers, Company name and Agreement Type as well as by affiliates
Conga CPQ is a great tool but lacks good support and [a] very limited knowledge base which doesn't include day to day errors which users face, thus leading us to support and take more time in turn. Also cart performance can be improved drastically which will enhance the user experience as the user doesn't have to wait for the pricing.
We had to use an outside vendor to implement the software and we paid them for a while during the initial choppy months. I was learning as I went along and then we could occasionally reach out to Salesforce if we really needed to. I think the support is there, but you obviously have to pay for it if the admin team doesn't have enough experience.
Onboarding was very organized and simple. Our account manager made it easy for our team to learn the tool by organizing several group training sessions.
You need to have IT involved. The implementation partner downplayed the role that IT would have to play. We needed data migration, user set-up, customizations within Apttus for legacy migrations. Luckily we had a developer on our staff for Salesforce.com.
It has been too long for me to remember all the various CPQ products we evaluated. But our short list came down to Salesforce CPQ and and Conga CPQ. At the time, we considered them both pretty close to equivalent solutions for meeting our needs, so negotiation mainly came down to price of the solution, and estimates to implement. Now that we are migrating to Lightning, the balance has tipped very strongly in Salesforce CPQ's favour.
Qwilr was a really quick and easy setup, which I think is great for smaller teams that have simple sales processes and cycles. Once more complication is it will fall short in providing the level of control and detail that is needed for a larger sales team. The end product is very elegant but comes down to the needs of the organization.
It cost the company almost $1million in 3 years of licensing. It then cost us the business to implement it in 2.5 years over $5 million dollars internally with resourcing involved to roll out globally. There was no ROI, that was just to implement it as the business continues to not adopt the product.
The adoption level of the product is ~25% of the business actually using the product.
Business areas ended up hiring and spending something near $150k/year in human resources to use the system for the sales team because of the low adoption.