Coremetrics / IBM Digital Analytics (discontinued) vs. LogicMonitor

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Coremetrics / IBM Digital Analytics (discontinued)
Score 7.9 out of 10
N/A
Based on the former Coremetrics, IBM Digital Analytics is a discontinued analytics product. IBM acquired Coremetrics in 2010, and re-branded the platform to the IBM Digital Marketing Optimization Solution. Product support was ultimately provided by Acoustic, but the product is not a part of the company's plans going forward.N/A
LogicMonitor
Score 8.4 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
LogicMonitor’s SaaS-based platform, LM Envision, enables observability across on-prem and multi-cloud environments. It provides IT and business teams operational visibility and predictability across their technologies and applications.N/A
Pricing
Coremetrics / IBM Digital Analytics (discontinued)LogicMonitor
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Enterprise
Contact sales team
Website Monitoring
Contact sales team
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Coremetrics / IBM Digital Analytics (discontinued)LogicMonitor
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsOur platform is broken down into Pro and Enterprise Pricing. Pro includes monitoring for all of your cloud, hybrid, and on-premises infrastructure. Our Enterprise package includes all of this, plus our AIOps and Machine Learning functionality that provides dynamic thresholds, root cause analysis, anomaly detection and more! LogicMonitor only charges by the device. What is considered a device? A device is anything with an IP address that you want to monitor, including a physical device or a cloud resource. This means multiple data sources under the same IP address can be monitored for the same price. Unlike some monitoring platforms. we don’t charge per node, interface, or metric.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Coremetrics / IBM Digital Analytics (discontinued)LogicMonitor
Considered Both Products
Coremetrics / IBM Digital Analytics (discontinued)
Chose Coremetrics / IBM Digital Analytics (discontinued)
In comparison to Adobe, I believe IBM Digital Analytics and Adobe Analytics are fairly similar in terms of features. When it comes to the marketing attribution approach, IBM is what sets it apart. Additionally, pre-integrated technologies with great ROI, like LIVEmail or IBM …
Chose Coremetrics / IBM Digital Analytics (discontinued)
Cognos has exploration but it doesn't have much AI and ML functionality. Watson is much more helpful when it comes to customer experience analytics. Watson gives clarity into end-to-end journeys and effectiveness while also giving the ability to visualize the actual customer …
Chose Coremetrics / IBM Digital Analytics (discontinued)
IBM Analytics is a great tool for measuring and analyzing web traffic along with consumer behavior to a degree. When compared to other solutions and tools available in the market today, I'd suggest checking out Kissmetrics or even Google analytics over this tool. Ultimately, it …
Chose Coremetrics / IBM Digital Analytics (discontinued)
IBM Digital Analytics was already in place when our team was brought on. None of us are fans. IBM does not seem to care from a customer service level whether or not we are satisfied or getting what we need out of their offering.
Chose Coremetrics / IBM Digital Analytics (discontinued)
I think that Google Analytics does everything just a little bit better than IBM. I was brought in with IBM being so deeply integrated with existing systems that changing to another tool isn't viable at this time.
Chose Coremetrics / IBM Digital Analytics (discontinued)
The alternative products mentioned differ wildly.

Adobe Analytics is similar to IBM CXA although not as strong for transactional web assets (eStores). In keeping with IBM CXA, integration with Adobe's own suite of products is strong. However, in a heterogeneous environment, this …
Chose Coremetrics / IBM Digital Analytics (discontinued)
IBM Analytics typically goes up against Adobe Analytics in the enterprise web analytics product selection process. When we determine a client isn't after the big guns, we'll usually refer them to Google Analytics, but when individual user conversion tracking is a must, we will …
Chose Coremetrics / IBM Digital Analytics (discontinued)
We have used Adobe Analytics and Google Analytics in similar instances. IBM Digital Analytics is between the 2 products, slightly better than Google Analytics but far behind the flexibility offered in Adobe.
Chose Coremetrics / IBM Digital Analytics (discontinued)
IBM Digital Analytics is typically a choice driven by CMS and pricing decisions. In terms of stand alone considerations:

Adobe Analytics typically wins on flexibility (aka ability to customize the system to your particular business)
Chose Coremetrics / IBM Digital Analytics (discontinued)
Coremetrics was the overall most comprehensive solution at the time.
Chose Coremetrics / IBM Digital Analytics (discontinued)
The customer support, advanced analysis and no data sampling are the primarily reasons why I would choose IBM over GA.
Chose Coremetrics / IBM Digital Analytics (discontinued)
Google Analytics - Compared to IBM, not as strong on the product reporting (product views, abandoned carts etc.). The end results can be achieved through custom variables, but that does require custom coding. While Google does at least have a reporting API, it is not nearly as …
Chose Coremetrics / IBM Digital Analytics (discontinued)
Google Analytics is great low cost alternative to IBM Digital Analytics for smaller, low traffic sites but does not offer the in depth product performance reports we require for our retail clients. IBM can add notes on Google's user interface but Google should really add …
Chose Coremetrics / IBM Digital Analytics (discontinued)
As a consulting company, we tailor the analytics solution to our clients. Usually they start with a free solution like Google Analytics, but they rapidly end up with a paying solution because it offers a deeper analysis and less restrictions on the data.

For instance Google …
Chose Coremetrics / IBM Digital Analytics (discontinued)
Much of the work we did in IBM Digital Analytics could have been answered through Google Analytics, a much simpler, agile and FREE solution set. Not mention, given the vast number of Google Analytics USERS, free and actionable support is simply a click away ... this compared to …
Chose Coremetrics / IBM Digital Analytics (discontinued)
Have extensive use of Omniture and Google Analytics, but I find Digital Analytics the best for retailers. It's is an easy to use solution that highlights the merchandising and marketing issues related to your website.
Chose Coremetrics / IBM Digital Analytics (discontinued)
Compared to Adobe: I think Adobe Analytics and IBM DA are very close in terms of functionalities. IBM makes the difference when it comes to the marketing attribution model. Also, the pre-integrated solutions such as LIVEmail or IBM Recommendations are very easy to use and allow …
Chose Coremetrics / IBM Digital Analytics (discontinued)
I mentioned Adobe and Google and made some comparisons in prior questions. I believe that any of these packages can be made quite powerful with a good implementation, which includes a good tagging strategy. I like Coremetrics best because I believe it is easier to get a solid …
Chose Coremetrics / IBM Digital Analytics (discontinued)
I feel that Google Analytics give you what you really need, without the hefty price tag. Along with giving you what you need, it is extremely more user friendly than IBM DA and can be easily learned by a multitude of people while still giving very significant information that …
Chose Coremetrics / IBM Digital Analytics (discontinued)
At the time we signed they were a Cadillac of software, there are really only 1-2 others that can compete on their level but that comes at a cost.
Chose Coremetrics / IBM Digital Analytics (discontinued)
IBM analytics prices can get really high if you overpass the contracted server calls, also increasing the amount of credits reports can get you the price to the roof
Chose Coremetrics / IBM Digital Analytics (discontinued)
Webtrends and Omniture were on the shortlist. Webtrends tagging implementation seemed a little less flexible than Omniture and Coremetrics. When it finally came down to pricing and desired features, Omniture and Coremetrics were not significantly different, so we based the …
Chose Coremetrics / IBM Digital Analytics (discontinued)
Omniture and Webtrends were also considered. When business needs are met by both Coremetrics and Omniture, the latter tends to be more expensive. Webtrends is often a good choice when server logs are also used with page tags. Server logs is an older technology which tends to …
LogicMonitor
Chose LogicMonitor
Our business used the trial period they provided on one of our systems and conducted sessions with all of this software. Our team tested all of these software options before deciding on LogicMonitor, as our business is expanding daily and we needed a system that could …
Chose LogicMonitor
Basically, we did not have any idea about it and how to choose, but we asked one of our former bosses, as they were very experienced with it, so they helped us by clarifying a few things between New Relic and LogicMonitor, as they told us that if you are looking for an …
Chose LogicMonitor
SaaS monitoring makes so much sense. Why run your monitoring inside the same environment you're trying to monitor, and how do you monitor your on prem monitoring if there's an outage affecting your own infrastructure? Whilst LogicMonitor isn't a specific point solution so …
Chose LogicMonitor
SolarWinds Access Rights Manager (ARM), SolarWinds NetFlow Traffic Analyzer (NTA), SolarWinds Network Automation Manager (NAM) and Microsoft System Center Operations Manager (SCOM)
Chose LogicMonitor
When looking for a monitoring tool, LogicMonitor was similar or better than all of them. We moved away from SolarWinds because of its inability to monitor other network environments and lack of a collector or probe type device that could collect remote data. PRTG was very …
Chose LogicMonitor
Fabrico and Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring
Chose LogicMonitor
LogicMonitor was the most versatile and easy to deploy solution. The data from LogicMonitor could be integrated with our other platforms, so it became the source of truth.
Chose LogicMonitor
We replaced N-Central with LogicMonitor, and had an extended bakeoff with Datadog. There were many things we liked (and still like) about Datadog, but its deployment model and less agnostic focus were disqualifying for our specific use case.
Chose LogicMonitor
Our initial business requirements in 2016 were to monitor Vblock and FlexPod deployments. We had specific gaps with particular storage appliances the monitoring tool we used at that time could not monitor effectively. When evaluating the mentioned solutions, LogicMonitor was …
Chose LogicMonitor
After switching from Solarwinds to LogicMonitor we would never go back. The higher price for LogicMonitor is well worth all the areas that this platform excels when compared to Solarwinds. The support is great, they are available directly through the web portal in a chat and I …
Chose LogicMonitor
During the evaluation process we looked a number of other solutions, a detailed technically analysis was carried out to map functionlity, deployment and scalabilty across the solutions.

The primary areas that LogicMonitor succeeded are around the simplicity of deployment, …
Chose LogicMonitor
LogicMonitor is good when compared with SolarWinds. Great UI and is simple to use.
Chose LogicMonitor
Domotz didnt cover all devices, for example MacOS devices. Which we dont have a lot of but are still critical to monitor on our network. Solarwinds Network Device monitoring was free and great, however the display was a bit much. Also had a lot of stuff we didnt really need to …
Chose LogicMonitor
Auvik did not provide historical data and could not monitor as many device types as LM. We found the Auvik collector to be more "buggy" and have had less issues with LM. We do feel that Auvik had a better network topology map and would clearly show device relationship. That is …
Chose LogicMonitor
Logic Monitor is not a near to the Solarwinds,
Chose LogicMonitor
LogicMonitor has a ton more ways to customize and monitor specific processes or items that other products simply cannot do. We started monitoring applications and actually logging into them to verify everything from start to finish is fully monitored and is working properly. I …
Chose LogicMonitor
SolarWinds had the big breach just as we left it. We loved how powerful it was, and how customizable - however, it is an ON-Prem tool, and as a growing MSP, that dynamic didn't and couldn't scale. We then moved to Auvik, which had the cleanest GUI and some neat features. That …
Chose LogicMonitor
LogicMonitor is much easier to configure, deploy, and manage than Zabbix. Alert tuning and client configuration is clear and intuitive in LogicMonitor. Zabbix is agent based, very convoluted configuration, and is difficult to adjust tuning to minimize false positives and alert …
Chose LogicMonitor
Solarwinds was a good tool when we were having a small amount of network devices, but once we reached to a large number of network devices, Solarwind started giving issues as it stopped respnding sometime, slowness in navigation, DB need fixes sometime etc. While the same data …
Chose LogicMonitor
Because LogicMonitor is easy to use and not as expensive as Nagios.
LogicMonitor has more functions and is more intuitive to resolve the issues raised.
Chose LogicMonitor
LogicMonitor was my team's choice for functionality, look-n-feel, and overall cost.
Chose LogicMonitor
LogicMonitor is a way easier to implement and keep it running than Zabbix due to the included SNMP template and the IA built in. The time to make it run is way faster.
Chose LogicMonitor
Auvik was much more simple to use, and the graphical representation of the network topology was very useful for networking. LogicMonitor definitely has the upper hand in the amount of information you can manage, however.
Chose LogicMonitor
LogicMonitor does config saves and netflow out-of-the-box, while other products we have evaluated did not. That is a huge advantage in my business, as we sell these two things as a service.
Best Alternatives
Coremetrics / IBM Digital Analytics (discontinued)LogicMonitor
Small Businesses
StatCounter
StatCounter
Score 9.0 out of 10
ConnectWise Automate
ConnectWise Automate
Score 8.3 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Optimal
Optimal
Score 9.0 out of 10
Icinga
Icinga
Score 7.8 out of 10
Enterprises
Optimal
Optimal
Score 9.0 out of 10
ScienceLogic SL1
ScienceLogic SL1
Score 8.9 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Coremetrics / IBM Digital Analytics (discontinued)LogicMonitor
Likelihood to Recommend
7.0
(0 ratings)
9.6
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
5.8
(0 ratings)
6.7
(0 ratings)
Usability
9.0
(0 ratings)
8.3
(0 ratings)
Availability
10.0
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Performance
8.0
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
2.3
(0 ratings)
9.3
(0 ratings)
In-Person Training
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Online Training
7.1
(0 ratings)
7.3
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
9.9
(0 ratings)
9.8
(0 ratings)
Configurability
8.0
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
9.0
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Coremetrics / IBM Digital Analytics (discontinued)LogicMonitor
Likelihood to Recommend
  • As mentioned earlier, transactional heavy web assets such as eStores are particularly strong candidates.
  • IBM CXA along with other, similar tools, is not set-and-forget. The solution must be well managed in order to deliver value. Purchase of the solution is one thing; driving analytic results is another. If a company's staff are not strong analytical thinkers, CXA will not help. IBM CXA is not just a technology platform - it is a basis to design strong customer touchpoints and interactions. You need to be customer journey design literate to get the best from this.
Read full review
We have several government departments and universities as our clients, and we conduct online examinations for them. Therefore, our servers require additional security to prevent unauthorized access to our systems remotely without our permission. We were performing an examination for one of our clients when someone from outside attempted to access our systems by creating a backdoor to our servers. Our team was busy handling the examination process and ensuring its smoothness. However, thanks to LogicMonitor, we were alerted at the right time, and we were able to save our data and clients' information with its help.
Read full review
Pros
  • Marketing attribution models - capable to deliver an holistic view of the marketing channels performance
  • Multisite capabilities : allows to have a Cie view as well as individual site's view
  • Unique customer view and Live Profile: we are able to go to the visitor level and therefore use the behavioural data for marketing actions
  • Reliability of the data: we have full confidence in the data collected and the rules are clear for us
  • Support: available support 24h/7.
Read full review
  • LogicMonitor is very customizable. We can build whatever modules we need, because it uses standard protocols like HTTPS, SNMP and WMI to gather data and metrics.
  • We like that LogicMonitor is an agentless solution for our use case. Not all customers will allow an agent-based approach to 3rd party tools.
  • LogicMonitor has thousands of out of the box modules, which work on their own and also act as good baselines for the ones that we will end up customizing more. We are rarely starting at zero when we decide to do something new with LogicMonitor.
  • LogicMonitor has great documentation, and support has been helpful in the instances where we've needed them.
Read full review
Cons
  • The new UI is slow, buggy, incomplete, is not intuitive, and has limited support or explanation.
  • The demo videos for the new UI showcase features that are not even available in the new UI and support said those features may never be available so they are not sure either why they are shown in the demo videos.
  • Tag management is extremely manual leaving a lot of room for human error.
  • Support across the board for the legacy UI and new UI are not very helpful. They typically do not take the time to understand the root of your problem and commonly default to the response "that feature is not available". For example, you cannot currently delete reports in the new UI even though there is a delete button available. Support says the feature is not available, so if you want anything deleted you have to submit a list to support and they will delete it for you. This is extremely frustrating when you are creating "test" reports in the new UI and then you have no option to delete them when done.
Read full review
  • Because of the rapid change in technology, maintaining DataSources to the most current level can be time-consuming for staff.
  • The network discovery and mapping capabilities are not as robust when compared to other solutions
  • While it can back-up configuration files on devices, it does not have the ability to push or modify configuration files back to devices.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
It is still a best in class analytics platform, but working with IBM contracting has proven to be quite a hassle at times... There are proven pros and cons to each of the major systems and vendors (most I already listed). I always recommend to establish the business questions you are trying to answer, determine which platform answers them best and decide whether it is worth the dollar investment
Read full review
This product has met virtually all of our needs. It was easy to implement and has been simple to support. Customization has been intuitive with many options available. They keep adding features and expanding available options. The future of LogicMonitor looks even better than it is today which is very promising. The management and support teams at LogicMonitor are always helpful
Read full review
Usability
Very easy to implement and use.
Read full review
Set up is super easy. Just stand up a small Linux or Windows server to act as a collector. There are no agents to install on monitored devices and all you need is SNMP or WMI access. When creating dashboards, all you have to do is find the widget on the device you want to show up and choose the menu option to add it.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Never had any issues
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Performance
As reports are templated, the system is pretty quick. Sometimes you have to wait a bit for a report to render. Or you might have to re-load the page. But there is no real issue here and the system is on par with other similar systems.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Overall, the level of support is very good and I would say it is a strong asset of the solution. However, you can sometimes feel that there is a difference of level among the support team.
Read full review
The sales team support we received was top notch. They worked hand in hand to make sure the product met all expectations. So far we have not really had to work with support that much; we have worked with setup team after purchase to deploy product fully. No issues so far and we are four weeks in.
Read full review
In-Person Training
No answers on this topic
Add good training
Read full review
Online Training
Online training is really great. One of the best assets that they have. Lots of great videos, pop quizzes at the end of each module. Fantastic. Other tools have similar features, but not as good.
Read full review
The training is good but room to improve
Read full review
Implementation Rating
See previous comment: reading and understanding the encyclopedic implementation guide is a must.
Read full review
I did not truly dedicate myself to implementing LogicMonitor. However, I overheard the IT team members explain that "LogicMonitor is perfect for us as it has made most of the work automated, and implementation and training sessions were perfect for us." Thus, I can state that everything went smoothly with our implementation.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
IBM Analytics is a great tool for measuring and analyzing web traffic along with consumer behavior to a degree. When compared to other solutions and tools available in the market today, I'd suggest checking out Kissmetrics or even Google Analytics over this tool. Ultimately, it will come down to the end user and if they are comfortable in the environment of the backend and workflows of IBM Digital Analytics.
Read full review
We did not use software like LogicMonitor for the same work before, but I must say that my experience with LogicMonitor has been outstanding so far. It helps me to be free of tension. I can now concentrate on the actual work I was hired to do for my company.
Read full review
Scalability
This solution can support large amount of data and transaction. The way that user management features are built, it shows it is meant for large organizations.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • Using IBM Digital Analytics has allowed us to optimize marketing spend for our clients and provide us the insight to reduce the spend on vendors that are not performing well or not bringing in qualified traffic.
  • Using IBM Digital Analytics data to power on-site product recommendations has increased the percentage of total sales from recommendation zones to around 10% compared to around 1% with manually merchandised zones.
  • Using IBM's TruePath Funnels to analyze the checkout process for various clients has allowed us to see where visitors are dropping out of the checkout process and make improvements to increase conversion rate.
Read full review
  • We have been able to eliminate multiple tools through LogicMonitor's ability to use collectors to run scripts and collect any numerical data from any reachable endpoint along with the customization and widgets available for dashboards. This has allowed for reduced costs and consolidation to a single point of view.
  • The ability to grant our clients access to see their data in real time has improved both our client satisfaction surveys and attributed to a few point gain in our NPS score. The ease of getting to the data has also reduced the quoting time for our sales teams during renewals to quantify what a client is consuming.
  • The amount of data that LogicMonitor collects affords our technicians a wide area of review when trying to isolate an issue and find a root cause. With the standard out of box data that is collected we have often been able to set a new threshold on something not previously thought of to proactively alert us in the future after identifying those root causes. This has reduced our Major Issues from 3-5 per month to usually 1-2 or less per quarter.
Read full review
ScreenShots

LogicMonitor Screenshots

Screenshot of AIOps features for enterprises using technology or hybrid environments with cloud and container resources. LogicMonitor can be used to monitor and improve the performance of complex enterprise networks with dynamic thresholds, topology mapping, anomaly detection, and root cause analysis.Screenshot of LM Envision's comprehensive monitoring and observability capabilities across the IT infrastructure, that help to identify alerts for the most important systems while ensuring the user experience is uninterrupted across the globe.Screenshot of Monitoring that ensures servers and the applications running on top of them are highly available. Helps resolve issues and optimize resource consumption for the server infrastructure.Screenshot of LogicMonitor remote workforce monitoring, which ensures that employees are connected to the systems that keep them productive and provide proactive insight into dispersed systems and third-party outages.Screenshot of Unified cloud monitoring across a hybrid multi-cloud ecosystem.Screenshot of LM Logs delivering log analysis at enterprise scale.