Crunchbase vs. PersistIQ

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Crunchbase
Score 7.7 out of 10
N/A
Crunchbase is a provider of private-company prospecting and research solutions. The vendor boasts that over 60 million users—including salespeople, entrepreneurs, investors, and market researchers—use Crunchbase to prospect for new business opportunities, and that companies all over the world rely on Crunchbase to power their applications, making over 3 billion calls to their API each year.
$0
PersistIQ
Score 1.6 out of 10
N/A
PersistIQ is a sales intelligence solution. The solution integrates with Salesforce as well as marketing automation platforms.N/A
Pricing
CrunchbasePersistIQ
Editions & Modules
Basic
$0
Crunchbase Starter
$29
per month, per user
Crunchbase Pro
$49
per month, per user
Crunchbase Enterprise
Custom Billing
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
CrunchbasePersistIQ
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
CrunchbasePersistIQ
Considered Both Products
Crunchbase
Chose Crunchbase
It has more data and it's for sure more accurate, Crunchbase has a better platform when talking about visual and it's also easier to search. Also, it has better filters which can help companies to dive deeper into researching accordingly to their needs
Chose Crunchbase
I like Pitchbook a lot -- but too expensive for a slight difference in our use case. If Crunchbase added valuation "estimates" (kind of like zillow "zestimates"), it would be awesome instead of just very good.
Chose Crunchbase
Crunchbase is cheaper and the overall price/value balance is better
Chose Crunchbase
Ptichbook. This platform is more detailed and has a lot more information regarding round details. The platform also has other features to build lists, market maps, landscapes and access reports and raw data about companies by vertical or any other segmentation. Also provides …
Chose Crunchbase
Crunchbase is definitely bottom of the barrel in this space. At similar pricing models, all competitors I have tried have significantly bigger and more updated databases. Crunchbase may have been great sometime in the past, but they are not worth engaging now.
Chose Crunchbase
Crunchbase is the best resource for prospecting startups hands down. TechTarget has a lot of useful info, but I found it to be inaccurate where it mattered most. Crunchbase's data seems more accurate, and is also easier to use. Not the most exact comparison, but they offer …
Chose Crunchbase
Sales Navigator is better only because it provides you with more direct contacts to reach out to. Crunchbase only tells you really the top dogs in the company like c-level execs, not necessarily contacts that you would be having sales conversations with.
Chose Crunchbase
Crunchbase has far more company data than LinkedIn Sales Navigator. The thing that it lacks is data on the people at those companies. LinkedIn Sales Navigator also has a better CRM integration, from what I understand. It is more automated. For our strategy, we use both of these …
Chose Crunchbase
This question always gets me. In a world with so many database solutions, it becomes quite difficult to compare, its the subtleties. Bigger is usually better...Crunchbase has gone through over 300...300 rounds of funding. In a world where there are so many options, going with …
Chose Crunchbase
I have found that Crunchbase has more up-to-date information when comparing ZoomInfo and EverString.
Chose Crunchbase
I don't know of other services like Crunchbase, in my mind it stands alone. Of course I could use FormDs, but it's cumbersome and doesn't provide the same level of information, so I rarely use it.
PersistIQ
Chose PersistIQ
We decided on PersistIQ because it was cheaper than the incumbents and as we were starting we wanted to see if this would be helpful or relevant to us. We later discovered Apollo.io and we might switch to them as they are also cheap and look better, but we might also get back …
Chose PersistIQ
I've used both PersistIQ and Outreach in the past 2 years, so I feel my comparisons should still be fairly accurate. Persist is better for smaller, earlier stage companies looking for a cheaper and easy sales automation tool. Outreach is definitely the more powerful and …
Chose PersistIQ
Outreach has more features for email sending alone, along with other features that help with sales. It helps make it a more all-in-one platform rather than just an email tool. I feel that Persist IQ doesn't go far beyond a mass email tool.
Chose PersistIQ
PersistIQ is the simplest and most affordable of the solutions I compared it against. It just works for most use cases.
Chose PersistIQ
Compared to MailChimp, Persist IQ allows for more personalization, simpler emails, and more complete campaigns. Mailchimp is basically a tool for bulk email with heavy design.

Versus Marketo, PersistIQ is much more user friendly. You don't need to be an engineer or SQL master to …
Chose PersistIQ
I haven't used many other mass email tools, but when I was investigating, PersistIQ was a very good bang for the buck. They are a relatively small investment for the technology, compared to their competitors. I also love that I can always email or use the widget to reach …
Chose PersistIQ
MailChimp isn't for cold emails, it is used for newsletters, and I think that if we were to try our campaign on MailChimp they would shut our account down within a matter of hours without any chance of recovery. PersistIQ is clear about what they are supposed to be used for …
Chose PersistIQ
They provided a rational approach which did not prove true for us.
Features
CrunchbasePersistIQ
Prospecting
Comparison of Prospecting features of Product A and Product B
Crunchbase
9.2
Ratings
17% above category average
PersistIQ
1.7
Ratings
128% below category average
Advanced search8.00 Ratings1.00 Ratings
Identification of new leads8.00 Ratings1.00 Ratings
List quality10.00 Ratings1.00 Ratings
List upload/download9.00 Ratings5.00 Ratings
Ideal customer targeting10.00 Ratings1.00 Ratings
Load time/data access10.00 Ratings1.00 Ratings
Sales Intelligence Data Standards
Comparison of Sales Intelligence Data Standards features of Product A and Product B
Crunchbase
6.9
Ratings
12% below category average
PersistIQ
1.0
Ratings
154% below category average
Contact information7.00 Ratings1.00 Ratings
Company information8.00 Ratings1.00 Ratings
Industry information5.70 Ratings1.00 Ratings
Data Augmentation & Lead Qualification
Comparison of Data Augmentation & Lead Qualification features of Product A and Product B
Crunchbase
8.9
Ratings
18% above category average
PersistIQ
1.9
Ratings
118% below category average
Lead qualification process5.10 Ratings1.00 Ratings
Smart lists and recommendations9.00 Ratings1.00 Ratings
Salesforce integration10.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Company/business profiles10.00 Ratings1.00 Ratings
Alerts and reminders8.00 Ratings1.00 Ratings
Data hygiene10.00 Ratings1.00 Ratings
Automatic data refresh10.00 Ratings1.00 Ratings
Tags9.00 Ratings1.00 Ratings
Filters and segmentation9.00 Ratings1.00 Ratings
Sales Intelligence Email Features
Comparison of Sales Intelligence Email Features features of Product A and Product B
Crunchbase
4.3
Ratings
54% below category average
PersistIQ
3.0
Ratings
85% below category average
Sales email templates4.30 Ratings3.00 Ratings
Append emails to records4.30 Ratings3.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
CrunchbasePersistIQ
Small Businesses
Lead411
Lead411
Score 9.1 out of 10
Lead411
Lead411
Score 9.1 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Lead411
Lead411
Score 9.1 out of 10
Lead411
Lead411
Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprises
TechTarget Priority Engine
TechTarget Priority Engine
Score 9.8 out of 10
TechTarget Priority Engine
TechTarget Priority Engine
Score 9.8 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
CrunchbasePersistIQ
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(0 ratings)
1.3
(0 ratings)
Usability
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
1.0
(0 ratings)
1.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
CrunchbasePersistIQ
Likelihood to Recommend
The data is outdated and has significant gaps. It is mostly a replication of what is easily and publicly available, with little value added. Their predatory subscription model includes no notice of renewal and they are very antagonistic towards their customers.
Read full review
Probably ok if you really don't care who you are sending your outreach to. Really bad for anyone who cares about sending a specific message to a specific audience. Probably not great for clients who enjoy reliable communication, quality results, or actually receiving what you're paying for.
Read full review
Pros
  • Account-Based Data. Employee range, website, industry, company description, chief executives, latest news, etc. All for the given company you are researching.
  • Salesforce integration. I have not used it, but the functionality is supposed to be great. You can run data enrichment in your CRM with the Crunchbase data.
  • Funding, mergers, and acquisitions data. Crunchbase has relationships with thousands of VC firms throughout the world and followup with each very regularly to be able to serve up the latest data to their users.
  • Tech integrations. Integrations with tools like Bombora, Builtwith, Siftery, and others are really useful because you can use Crunchbase's company profile-based research method, and see the data from these tools specifically related to the given company.
Read full review
  • Integrates well with tools that work with LinkedIn Sales Navigator to scrap lead emails.
  • Makes it easy to manage large-scale cold email campaigns with 3+ steps.
  • When a prospect replies to an email, it doesn't send them any of the automated emails which allow me to follow-up with those warm leads correctly.
Read full review
Cons
  • Notifications - Something similar to TweetDeck would be nice, so that when news breaks it could be an immediate fact.
  • Honestly dont add too much because you don't want it to become more of a social tool with cluttered info, keep it straight to the point.
Read full review
  • There are some issues with downloading reports. That is, some information is only available in-product and you cannot export these things.
  • Creating dynamic replies or steps in Persist isn't currently available.
  • Sometimes the Persist system doesn't catch errors in unfilled prospect fields. One must be check and be careful not to send these types of emails.
Read full review
Usability
In our experience, the customer service is horrible to non existent. If we were a fortune 100 company with a staff of computer people I am sure this would be a valuable service as they would "speak the language" but that is not us. Not being able to reach customer service when we are thinking about upgrading is, in my opinion, a crazy business model.
Read full review
In my opinion, poor service, and in our experience, ignoring our advise on who our customers are.
Read full review
Support Rating
They give standard answers. They are not a customer first business. I tried to cancel my subscription after using it for only 1 week as we found the information was outdated and not at all useful. But they would not cancel the year long subscription I mistakenly signed up for
Read full review
Terrible; non-existent. Weeks without replies, and no improvements in 4 months.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Ptichbook. This platform is more detailed and has a lot more information regarding round details. The platform also has other features to build lists, market maps, landscapes and access reports and raw data about companies by vertical or any other segmentation. Also provides emails on c-suite. Crunchbase however is an easier tool to use so if complicated segmentation is not required, Crunchabse is a great solution. It's also super fast to access and provides a succinct and easy to read profile view.
Read full review
Compared to MailChimp, Persist IQ allows for more personalization, simpler emails, and more complete campaigns. MailChimp is basically a tool for bulk email with heavy design. Versus Marketo, PersistIQ is much more user friendly. You don't need to be an engineer or SQL master to use Persist. It's made for sales and marketing folks. Marketo is built for bigger teams with engineers and CRM experts. Marketo is better for nurture campaigns and automated email, plus database management and as a CRM. But Persist is a much lighter option and it's WAY cheaper. I've used the Gmail plug-in for HubSpot and their templates feature. It's not great for bulk email or building out campaigns, but it's nice to have canned messages right in Gmail. To use PersistIQ on the other hand, one must work directly in their system, not in Gmail, although replies and sent messages do go directly though the email provider.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Crunchbase has enabled my company to be more efficient in determining whether or not to conduct further diligence on companies.
  • Tailoring searches for certain criteria has been helpful for aggregating competitors and companies of similar profiles.
  • The software is not only powerful, but also affordable!
Read full review
  • I have 100% closed multiple deals due to my outreach on PersistIQ.
  • Outside of closing deals, this has been a great tool for getting me in front of a lot of high profile clients.
  • I have easily paid for my license with PersistIQ in 8 months.
Read full review
ScreenShots