Datto Autotask PSA vs. Freshservice

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Autotask PSA
Score 8.9 out of 10
N/A
Autotask PSA is designed as a complete IT Business Management Platform for MSPs, now from Datto (resulting from the Autotask merger with Datto in 2017).N/A
Freshservice
Score 8.8 out of 10
N/A
Freshservice is a cloud-based service desk and IT service management (ITSM) solution that currently serves more than 10,000 SMB, mid-market, and enterprise customers worldwide.
$29
per month per agent
Pricing
Datto Autotask PSAFreshservice
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Starter
$29.00
per month per agent
Growth
$59.00
per month per agent
Pro
$119.00
per month per agent
Enterprise
Custom
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Autotask PSAFreshservice
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsDiscount available for annual billing.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Datto Autotask PSAFreshservice
Considered Both Products
Autotask PSA
Chose Autotask PSA
Atera is an RMM first with PSA features so it falls short of a PSA. The essentials are there for a fledgling MSP, but for more advanced ticket handling and contract management, it falls short. When I used Zendesk at the beginning (about 10 years ago), it was really only a …
Chose Autotask PSA
Kaseya BMS, Kaseya VSA, Datto Alto, Datto Cloud Continuity, Datto Backupify, Datto RMM, Datto Routers and ServiceNow IT Service Management
Chose Autotask PSA
Datto Autotask is much more complex than Atera's ticketing platform but is much more customizable.
Chose Autotask PSA
Datto Autotask PSA is probably the best all-in-one platform for MSPs. It's targeted and designed specifically for MSPs, whilst most service desk software/PSA is often just general service desk software.
Chose Autotask PSA
Autotask is more robust than simple ticketing systems. It provides better billing ability that many ticketing systems and works well with existing clients. The invoicing options provided are beneficial to the business and streamline the process. The ticketing system provides …
Chose Autotask PSA
The portion of Autotask that we've used other companies for prior to using Autotask is the Endpoint Management. The Autotask Endpoint Management (AEM) portal integrates perfectly with their PSA/CRM tools. It's alerting features are much better than the above software as there …
Chose Autotask PSA
Everything else either has multiple modules or you need separate suites to do everything you want.
Chose Autotask PSA
It has been many years since we compared Autotask to the competition. We made the decision early on because of the overall solution that Autotask provides. It suits our needs well and we have not had a need to change since.
Chose Autotask PSA
Cost was a factor. Our small company size meant less licenses to pay for each month for a web based product that our clients could easily use.
Chose Autotask PSA
Its definitely has a better layout. Easier to customize. Easier search.
Chose Autotask PSA
ConnectWise would be a close second however the overall functionality hasn't been great in the past, I've learned they've implemented a more robust web interface however the client was not stable. Autotask is easy to manage from service requests, reporting and time management.
Chose Autotask PSA
I've used OTRS and Autotask gives a better overall experience as it isn't just simply a ticketing system it gives greater breadth over what you can accomplish. It allows for better interdepartmental communication rather than just a place for end users and clients to dump more …
Chose Autotask PSA
Autotask stacks up fairly well against software like Kaseya, ConnectWise, and Tigerpaw. They all have their own strengths and weaknesses, however I feel that ConnectWise and Autotask have improved the most as of the last 10 years. The reason we chose Autotask is because it …
Chose Autotask PSA
Except for multi-tenancy and permissioning for external users, Autotask beats BMC Remedy in every category for an ITSM Incident/Request Management suite. From allowing legitimate multi-tasking to the streamlined and more-straightforward user experience, Autotask takes the focus …
Chose Autotask PSA
ServiceNow was faster to use to create tickets in a fast-paced call center style helpdesk. I preferred it to Autotask, but from a business perspective, I felt that Autotask covers a lot more ground than ServiceNow. My Experience with Solar Winds was minimal although it was a …
Chose Autotask PSA
We tested several solutions ranging from short-term trials to extended 6-month production runs and found the other solutions to lack what we needed. Autotask PSA was a more mature, thought-out, and developed product that had everything we needed in a single solution. Over the …
Freshservice
Chose Freshservice
Freshservice's UI and UX scheme is much easier to navigate than other products. Most modules or configurations are easily accessible via the admin section and workspace management is segmented off from global administration, allowing for business units to designate their own …
Chose Freshservice
Fresh service stacks up against DeskPro and heftily outweighs it. Freshservice is able to handle more workflow. It is able to house more information. It is more of a solution than just assistance with help desk ticketing. They are two different platforms. Freshservice has more …
Chose Freshservice
FreshDesk is great, if you have a smaller team with a shared inbox, unfortunately, FreshService helped segregate data from our department and others departments, in a way that FreshDesk didnt provide.
Chose Freshservice
Easy setup and a lot of customization which can be made.
They offer the full ITSM tool for 75$ per agent and all the PRO are included in the package, which makes it easy to calculate and use.
There are only a few add-ins that you need to pay for, based on the number of agents …
Chose Freshservice
Freshservice is far superior in every aspect
Chose Freshservice
Pricing and ease of implementation.
Chose Freshservice
Freshservice is far easier to configure than Service-now. While service-now is perhaps better suited for large enterprise organizations, it requires a dedicated to administer. Freshservice on the other hand, is relatively easy to configure, but certainly targeted to smaller and …
Chose Freshservice
It was not great, so we ended up not using after 1 year, and bought Freshservice
Chose Freshservice
Freshservice did a great introduction, took their time to setup sessions describing how they could help our business. They were easy to reach during POC and didn't try to give us more than we needed.
Chose Freshservice
I prefer Freshservice significantly because messages don't go away until you mark them as "resolved." With Slack, it is very easy to totally lose a message. With Workvivo, it is difficult to message at all—it connects with Slack for personal messages, but the functionality for …
Chose Freshservice
Freshservice has a much more complete package compared to Mojo Helpdesk, as it includes advanced automation, many integrations with 3rd party tools and asset management.
Chose Freshservice
I have used or evaluated ServiceNow, Zendesk, and Jira Service Management. ServiceNow is powerful but complex, Zendesk is great for customer support, and Jira excels in ITSM for agile teams.Freshservice stands out for its balance between usability and functionality, making ITSM …
Chose Freshservice
Customization of FreshService was so much easier than ChangeGear. Creating forms for end-users was difficult and didn't always work the way we wanted. The nail in the coffin was when we had a support call set up, and the IT Director was on the phone waiting, but no one joined …
Chose Freshservice
The user-interface, Marketplace, out-of-box Orchestrations and ability for Admins to perform product specific configurations at much easier and faster pace is a much loved feature of Freshservice, when comparing it with other ITSM solutions.
Chose Freshservice
Main reasons for choosing Freshservice where:
- It has a user-friendly interface from agent use to configuration and administration.
-High grade of customization options without a large use of external consultants.
Chose Freshservice
This is the first time I've been hired to do software management so unfortunately I have no prior experience with similar systems aside from a ticket system frontend. This speaks to how easy it was to setup and roll out Freshservice since I learned most of the inner workings by …
Chose Freshservice
Freshservice offers way more tools, much better support and has a very clean and more modern interface compared to sysaid
Chose Freshservice
Freshservice has a so many options which we have been extremely impressive with as it have some many options to ultize.

KACE overall the application has limited functionality and works as a basic IT ticketing with.
Chose Freshservice
As we are a smaller IT team, and a medium sized organization, we found most options for an ITSM to be more robust and overkill for our needs. Freshservice hit the mark in terms of features and pricing.
Chose Freshservice
The search list is WAY too hard to use - I have used
Jira service management - Freshservice is WAY better
ServiceNow ITSM, ITAM (SAM, HAM), ITOM, Project, Change - SNow is WAY better but also WAY WAY more expensive
Chose Freshservice
We use Freshservice for our wider business but use freshdesk, chat & caller for our customer service team. We believe Freshservice is a tool designed for IT & other departments and believe freshdesk provides better tools for our customer service team.
Chose Freshservice
We went with Freshservice because it was the tool that offered us the most complete solution for what we needed vs the competition. And its interface was one of our favorites.
Chose Freshservice
JumpCloud, ServiceNow Enterprise Asset Management, Okta and Admin Tools for Jira
Chose Freshservice
We used OTRS before Freshservice, and Freshservice is much easier to use and manage. We were checking on Service Cloud, as another branch of the company has implemented this, but there were a lot of features Service Cloud had problems with implementing that we take for granted …
Chose Freshservice
I wasn't able to fully leverage ServiceNow in the past. I only used ServiceNow's ticketing portal. But by just basing the self-service portal and SNow's ticketing module, I'd say that Freshservices' interface is way more customer-centric and user-friendly. I may be wrong or …
Features
Datto Autotask PSAFreshservice
Incident and problem management
Comparison of Incident and problem management features of Product A and Product B
Datto Autotask PSA
-
Ratings
Freshservice
8.2
Ratings
1% above category average
Organize and prioritize service tickets00 Ratings9.10 Ratings
Expert directory00 Ratings8.30 Ratings
Service restoration00 Ratings8.40 Ratings
Self-service tools00 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Subscription-based notifications00 Ratings7.90 Ratings
ITSM collaboration and documentation00 Ratings7.60 Ratings
ITSM reports and dashboards00 Ratings8.10 Ratings
ITSM asset management
Comparison of ITSM asset management features of Product A and Product B
Datto Autotask PSA
-
Ratings
Freshservice
7.7
Ratings
6% below category average
Configuration mangement00 Ratings7.40 Ratings
Asset management dashboard00 Ratings7.50 Ratings
Policy and contract enforcement00 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Change management
Comparison of Change management features of Product A and Product B
Datto Autotask PSA
-
Ratings
Freshservice
8.0
Ratings
5% below category average
Change requests repository00 Ratings7.70 Ratings
Change calendar00 Ratings7.80 Ratings
Service-level management00 Ratings8.40 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Datto Autotask PSAFreshservice
Small Businesses
HaloPSA
HaloPSA
Score 9.3 out of 10
Agiloft Service Desk (discontinued)
Agiloft Service Desk (discontinued)
Score 9.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Planview AdaptiveWork
Planview AdaptiveWork
Score 7.4 out of 10
Agiloft Service Desk (discontinued)
Agiloft Service Desk (discontinued)
Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Planview AdaptiveWork
Planview AdaptiveWork
Score 7.4 out of 10
ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus
ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus
Score 9.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Datto Autotask PSAFreshservice
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(0 ratings)
8.5
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.0
(0 ratings)
8.7
(0 ratings)
Usability
9.0
(0 ratings)
9.5
(0 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
7.8
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.4
(0 ratings)
8.3
(0 ratings)
In-Person Training
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(0 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
7.2
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
7.9
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
6.4
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
8.1
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
8.3
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Datto Autotask PSAFreshservice
Likelihood to Recommend
In my opinion, Datto Autotask is exceptionally complicated to set up, manage, and use on a daily basis. I would think the target market for this product would be someone managing a team of 20 - 50 people, possibly more. In my experience, for it to run properly you will need to dedicate at least half an FTE to running this product in an organization of that size per month. I would not recommend it for companies with less than 10 people or for companies that value quick communication with their clients. I would not recommend it for companies using Datto's RMM product. The integration exists, but it is clearly a bolt-on. They were not developed together and they are slow to talk to each other. Frequently you cannot add details from RMM sessions into the PSA without manually copying the ticket number, and if the ticket is more than a week old, then you can't even find it with the ticket number.
Read full review
Freshservice is a great all round product with many features. Asset management, Reporting, ticketing, automatization. It was much easier for us using the Freshservice app to scan barcodes for our new devices to get them in the asset management tool, automating certain tasks such as service requests for new devices automatically making a ticket and assigning assets to certain people and getting reports from this afterwards. For a medium to large size company this is great value. For a smaller business there are smaller bundles they provide which are much more affordable in case you do not need all of the features they provide. In summary, lots of features for a snappy, responsive piece of software.
Read full review
Pros
  • AutoTask allows for us to receive and work support tickets very easily. We've setup various 'Issue Types' that in turn are bound to SLAs ensuring that items are worked appropriately as they are received.
  • The automation that AutoTask allows for with regards to various emails/requests coming through has been great. It allows for us to not have to constantly "watch the queue" as when a critical item arrives the appropriate persons are notified and can work it.
  • I feel that the management of AutoTask for both user setup, and various automations is done well. We're able to copy settings as needed, and create templates for multiple items.
Read full review
  • Asset Management Module: The features I like most in this module are the discovery agent software, which allows us to collect device information without manual intervention, and the simplicity and robustness of the module itself.
  • Service Catalog: This feature allows us to create forms tailored to specific service requests based on group requirements. The ability to customize forms greatly helps both us and our end-users provide the necessary information to fulfill their requests.
  • Workflow Automator and Business Rules: These two allow us to have some automation in place, eliminating some of the manual steps and decreasing the number of human errors that may happen due to manual changes.
Read full review
Cons
  • The GUI is a little dated.
  • Some integrations are limited for not being a Datto product.
  • While not as complex to set up as Connectwise, it definitely requires some serious thought during the initial setup.
  • Email processing could offer more options for parsing keywords and allow for more automation.
  • The mobile app is just not worth using in my experience.
Read full review
  • Workflow management is hard to troubleshoot
  • Some default fields can't be changed
  • FAQ has no history
  • Work flow management can't be managed via API or a command line
  • Service Requests and contracts have no possibilities to choose how pricing will be calculated, like per month, per user, per year, per lifetime...
  • Automatic backup of assets and FAQ is not possible
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
After using multiple products on the market, Autotask was intuitive and easy to manage.
Read full review
We are pretty invested in Freshservice right now and have integrated it pretty heavily into our environment, so it would be hard to move away from it. For the most part, we are happy with Freshservice and the ease of use it gives us in managing tickets through the system. The only complaint we've had is customer service.
Read full review
Usability
Datto Autotask PSA is a full featured product that can do almost anything you need. There is a significant learning curve to get started which requires several hours spent in product training. Additionally, several hours / days are needed to get clients imported, contracts configured, and integrations implemented. Once the setup and user training is complete, the product is very functional, but it's imperative to not get overwhelmed when starting out.
Read full review
Easy to navigate and use GUI. We have many infrastructure team members from various departments using Freshservice and their on-boarding and training was very straightforward and we have not received much, if any negative feedback from non-technology users in regards to overall usability, interface or functionality.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
No answers on this topic
Downtime is minimal (it does happen but not often)
Read full review
Performance
No answers on this topic
Most reports are quick, however, it can take some time for emailed exports to come via email. It would be helpful to have the exports live in the system rather than having to wait on emails.
Read full review
Support Rating
They are fairly quick at returning a response to a problem and have been able to fix all issues for the most part.
Read full review
Support from OEM is decent but needs improvement. Sometimes OEM also needs to understand the criticality of the customer and help as an Ad-hoc, which is somewhat lacking at Feshservice. Although the normal support team is well-equipped and helps according to the matrix, if something critical for the partner or customer requires immediate attention, it still goes through the L1-L2-L3 levels, which wastes a lot of time.
Read full review
In-Person Training
No answers on this topic
Training was enough to use the base website
Read full review
Online Training
No answers on this topic
Their documentation is pretty good, but only available in English. This makes it difficult for some of our users to understand. There are also some basic video courses available.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
Creating the correct groups for the stakeholders and enabling the right notifications are one of the most important aspect of the implementation. Creating Change templates will also help in the long run and it's a good practice to create one, if applicable.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
The portion of Autotask that we've used other companies for prior to using Autotask is the Endpoint Management. The Autotask Endpoint Management (AEM) portal integrates perfectly with their PSA/CRM tools. It's alerting features are much better than the above software as there aren't a bunch of superfluous and unneeded alerts. Instead, it only alerts for things that you specify that you want. Alerts aside, for the PSA/CRM, I don't have much to compare it to as Autotask was the first PSA we tried. It's hard to imagine a PSA having more features or doing a better job than Autotask.
Read full review
Freshservice is ahead in some areas, behind in others. For example, workspaces have been part of other products for many years. Freshworks just introduced it in 2023. Integration with productivity tools is better than past products we have used. Apps continue to be added as well. We selected Freshservice as it was the best mix of functionality and cost. We don't need solutions as robust as ServiceNow, for example, but found that Freshservice had some comparable advanced features.
Read full review
Scalability
No answers on this topic
The software is very scalable from a small to mid sized team. The features have seemed to scale exceptionally well.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • We were able to identify the profitability of our entire client base.
  • We identified a loss of over 1 million dollars for time unbilled consultancy fees using metrics derived from Autotask.
  • Autotask helped us serve our client base in a professional manner, it's like having an entire department at your finger tips.
  • Autotask is the heartbeat of our operation.
Read full review
  • Alleviate our support team by providing knowledge directly to the end users.
  • Better response times from our IT support team, thanks to automation and dashboard use.
  • Better tracking of our assets by assigning them to users so we know which device was handed out to who. During off-boarding, we know which devices to ask back.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Freshservice Screenshots

Screenshot of Android App SupportScreenshot of Asset ManagementScreenshot of Project ManagementScreenshot of Asset ManagementScreenshot of Change ManagementScreenshot of Project Management