Digital Certificates Web vs. Webroot Endpoint Protection

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Digital Certificates Web
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
N/AN/A
Webroot Endpoint Protection
Score 8.1 out of 10
N/A
Webroot Endpoint Protection is the OpenText company's business class multi-vector endpoint protection application, providing centralized endpoint management, deep learning intelligence, and advanced behavioral analytics.
$150
per year per 5 seats
Pricing
Digital Certificates WebWebroot Endpoint Protection
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Business Endpoint Protection
$150.00
per year per 5 seats
Business Endpoint Protection
$690.00
per year per 25 seats
Business Endpoint Protection
Contact sales team
per 50+ seats
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Digital Certificates WebWebroot Endpoint Protection
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Digital Certificates WebWebroot Endpoint Protection
Considered Both Products
Digital Certificates Web

No answer on this topic

Webroot Endpoint Protection
Chose Webroot Endpoint Protection
We chose Webroot Endpoint Protection for its lightweight, cloud-based management and minimal impact on system performance. Compared to other solutions we tested and used, Webroot Endpoint Protection offers quick deployment, strong malware protection, and low overhead, making it …
Chose Webroot Endpoint Protection
Webroot is good in a way that it is an all encompassing solution one stop shop for protecting endpoints but it needs to be managed and licensed. Some users do not need constant protection or need to have it on their machines in where the combination of Field Effect and …
Chose Webroot Endpoint Protection
I use them both. Webroot Endpoint Protection is deployed at the corporate level, but ThreatDown is added at the unit level. If I could only choose 1, Webroot Endpoint Protection would not be it. But, as I said, its price vs. performance ration might be superior to ThreatDown.
Chose Webroot Endpoint Protection
Webroot Endpoint Protection is not as feature rich as the other products, but it is a great entry level product.
Chose Webroot Endpoint Protection
We found other products to be able to detect malware and malicious URL's better than Webroot Endpoint Protection. Thus, we moved away from Webroot Endpoint Protection. Also, over the years, there were at least 2 big mistakes by Webroot, where our business applications were …
Chose Webroot Endpoint Protection
Microsoft Defender is very different from Webroot Endpoint Protection. To explain, Webroot Endpoint Protection must be installed locally for all devices. Microsoft has a local installation for Defender for Windows PCs. What is different is how Microsoft Defender runs on the …
Chose Webroot Endpoint Protection
Less system intensive than Symantec, with a much better management setup on the backend. More robust than Microsoft Defender, though a little heavier on the resources required, but the feature comparison is night and day between the two. Defender does nicely integrate with the …
Chose Webroot Endpoint Protection
We would consider Webroot in the top 5 when you factor in ease of use, level of protection, and cost. Probably not as comprehensive as other end-point security solutions but the proper level of functionality and support for our needs. Question what impact the acquisition by …
Chose Webroot Endpoint Protection
Both Avast and Norton have caused issues with their impact on system performance. Avast recently caused a major lag on a client-server, and Symantec slows down our systems so much that we ended up recommending more memory than was generally needed.
Chose Webroot Endpoint Protection
Webroot Business Endpoint Protection does not hog system resources like Norton and other products do. You don't even know it's running. A look in the task manager will show it's very low on the resource list.
Chose Webroot Endpoint Protection
Webroot is very lightweight to install and does not slow up your computer.
Chose Webroot Endpoint Protection
Webroot Endpoint Protection compares well to the other products listed. Viper, GFI and Symantec are a lot more intrusive and bloated compared to Webroot. The installation is more streamlined as well. The interface is streamlined and not full of fluff as to compared with …
Chose Webroot Endpoint Protection
Some of the other options available to us were less expensive than Webroot Endpoint Protection. Still, either required too much management on our end didn't offer multi-platform protection or didn't have all of the features we were looking for.
Chose Webroot Endpoint Protection
With Webroot, installation is quick and doesn't require a reboot, definitions are always up-to-date without lengthy definition downloads, and the footprint makes it unnoticeable to clients. This can't be said about the other products I have used. Something would inevitably …
Chose Webroot Endpoint Protection
Webroot Endpoint Protection beats the competition in various aspects. Webroot provides an easy web portal management of protected devices. Installation occurs very easily on all devices. Furthermore, the price to protect a workstation vs a server is one and the same.
Chose Webroot Endpoint Protection
I can tell you that the Webroot Business Endpoint Protection is much better than the competition in three primary areas. Number one; they are the smallest footprint so as not to decrease the performance of the endpoint. Number two; Webroot Business Endpoint Protection is very …
Chose Webroot Endpoint Protection
Webroot is extremely light on the system resources and incredibly quick to install. From what I've seen it's just as good for malware as Kaspersky and ESET.
Chose Webroot Endpoint Protection
Way too heavy of an application. Webroot is a lot lighter and easier to use. Kaspersky overloads the system and pops up at the worst possible time, while Webroot just runs in the background doing its thing.
Chose Webroot Endpoint Protection
Webroot has been a much better asset both financially and in overall general use. Compared to Avast and Kaspersky, its been a much better decision that fits into our budget, and compared to Norton, it definitely uses a lot less resources on the endpoint. Norton tended to make …
Chose Webroot Endpoint Protection
I think that the AV clients are more light weight than the others which makes running on older slower computers more manageable. Also Cloud manamgenet is a huge, huge plus.
Chose Webroot Endpoint Protection
We looked at Kaspersky, Bitdefender, Norton. Webroot is usually No.1 or 2 based on ratings and user reviews/feedback. Easy to deploy and managability were also key to choosing Webroot.
Chose Webroot Endpoint Protection
Webroot is a player, not as mature as others, however, has a favorable price point
Features
Digital Certificates WebWebroot Endpoint Protection
Endpoint Security
Comparison of Endpoint Security features of Product A and Product B
Digital Certificates Web
-
Ratings
Webroot Endpoint Protection
7.6
Ratings
12% below category average
Anti-Exploit Technology00 Ratings8.80 Ratings
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Centralized Management00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Hybrid Deployment Support00 Ratings7.10 Ratings
Infection Remediation00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Vulnerability Management00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Malware Detection00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Digital Certificates WebWebroot Endpoint Protection
Small Businesses
1Password
1Password
Score 9.5 out of 10
ThreatLocker
ThreatLocker
Score 9.5 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
1Password
1Password
Score 9.5 out of 10
BlackBerry Protect (CylancePROTECT)
BlackBerry Protect (CylancePROTECT)
Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprises
Norton 360
Norton 360
Score 7.0 out of 10
BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management
BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management
Score 9.8 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Digital Certificates WebWebroot Endpoint Protection
Likelihood to Recommend
-
(0 ratings)
7.5
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.5
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
7.8
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Digital Certificates WebWebroot Endpoint Protection
Likelihood to Recommend
No answers on this topic
The software tends to do a good job of basic protection but is not the best for larger clients and is not as powerful as some others offered on the market today. The support is not the best either, have had a hard time getting assistance in the past trying to resolve issues.
Read full review
Pros
No answers on this topic
  • Webroot Endpoint Protection works very well at blocking threats quickly and can undo changes if a file turns out to be harmful, which has helped us in the past.
  • It runs quietly in the background without slowing down endpoints, even during scans, which is great.
  • You can manage all your devices from one online dashboard, making it easy to set rules and see security alerts. One pane of glass is always great.
Read full review
Cons
No answers on this topic
  • It was missing detections. We found a better product that detects more malware.
  • Deploying the endpoint agents was easy, but deploying Web Threat Shield was not and users could disable that functionality.
  • When you deactivated old endpoints, they were put in an "inactive" category. You could not then delete the "inactive" endpoints. For someone who likes to keep things clean, this was annoying.
  • I found the rollout of endpoint agent updates to be rather slow.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
It has proven successful so far in our environment for controlling malware/virus outbreaks.
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
It does what it needs to do but we have noticed that malware is sort of uncommon and we have started to switch to other solutions of combating malware and suspicious activity such as using products like ThreatLocker and Field Effect, combined with things like malware bytes to perform scans when needed.
Read full review
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
Support has been reliable up to this point. A request can easily be generated via the console and support responding in a reasonable time. We have not had any major issues other than the basic agents not communicating with the console and the like.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
I had some difficulties with remote users. I ended up needing to open a remote tech support session and finish the process. Other than a few speed bumps, I was impressed with the engineering of the install. Because of time differences, I was done installing in two days. The cost, per license, could be less.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
No answers on this topic
We would consider Webroot in the top 5 when you factor in ease of use, level of protection, and cost. Probably not as comprehensive as other end-point security solutions but the proper level of functionality and support for our needs. Question what impact the acquisition by OpenText is having on future development and support. OpenText also acquire Carbonite for back-up support.
Read full review
Return on Investment
No answers on this topic
  • It saves us time and money in the fact that it runs and we never really have to worry about that part of IT. IT just runs
  • Being able to centrally manage the clients is another plus because of being able to reach it virtually anywhere.
  • Very simple quick installs. Gives us time to do other things.
Read full review
ScreenShots